What AI assistants actually recommend when buyers ask about ai tools for developers writing documentation — measured weekly across 4 engines, published as open data.
Updated 2026-08-04 · 67 sampled answers · rolling 4-week window · methodology
Rankings are measured from sampled AI answers — never editorial, never paid. Orbator builds AI-visibility tooling; when Orbator itself appears in any category, it is measured by the same rules as everyone else.
Sample: 67 AI answers · Window: Jul 7, 2026 – Aug 4, 2026 (4-week rolling) · trend vs prior 4 weeks (44 answers)
Across 67 sampled AI answers from 4 engines, Mintlify is recommended most often — appearing in 56.7% of recommendations, followed by ReadMe (53.7%) and GitBook (41.8%).
This is a measurement of share of voice across 4 AI engines — not an editorial pick. See the full ranking below.
| # | Product | Share | Trend | Engines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mintlify mintlify.com Best for: AI recommends Mintlify most when buyers ask “best AI tools for developers writing technical documentation” (91.7% of those answers) | 56.7% 95% CI 44.8–67.9% 38 mentions · avg pos 5.7 first pick 31.6% | — | GEMINI 59.3%CHATGPT 50%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 59.3% | Claim |
| 2 | ReadMe readme.com Best for: AI recommends ReadMe most when buyers ask “what AI tool should I use to automatically generate README files from my code” (100% of those answers) | 53.7% 95% CI 41.9–65.1% 36 mentions · avg pos 5.6 first pick 27.8% | — | GEMINI 59.3%CHATGPT 50%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 51.9% | Claim |
| 3 | GitBook gitbook.com Best for: AI recommends GitBook most when buyers ask “alternatives to the mainstream AI documentation generation platforms for developers” (91.7% of those answers) | 41.8% 95% CI 30.7–53.7% 28 mentions · avg pos 10.7 first pick 10.7% | — | GEMINI 48.1%CHATGPT 50%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 37% | Claim |
| 4 | Swimm swimm.io Best for: AI recommends Swimm most when buyers ask “which AI docs tool is best for open source projects vs internal engineering teams” (55.6% of those answers) | 35.8% 95% CI 25.4–47.8% 24 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 4.2% | — | GEMINI 37%CHATGPT 16.7%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 40.7% | Claim |
| 5 | Fern buildwithfern.com Best for: AI recommends Fern most when buyers ask “alternatives to the mainstream AI documentation generation platforms for developers” (75% of those answers) | 28.4% 95% CI 19–40.1% 19 mentions · avg pos 10.4 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 29.6%CHATGPT 50%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 22.2% | Claim |
| 6 | DocuWriter.ai docuwriter.ai Best for: AI recommends DocuWriter.ai most when buyers ask “how do I use AI to keep technical documentation in sync with code changes” (58.3% of those answers) | 26.9% 95% CI 17.7–38.5% 18 mentions · avg pos 4.9 first pick 5.6% | — | GEMINI 7.4%CLAUDE 57.1%PERPLEXITY 44.4% | Claim |
| 7 | Git git-scm.com Best for: AI recommends Git most when buyers ask “which AI docs tool is best for open source projects vs internal engineering teams” (77.8% of those answers) | 26.9% 95% CI 17.7–38.5% 18 mentions · avg pos 7.9 first pick 16.7% | — | GEMINI 37%CHATGPT 16.7%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 18.5% | Claim |
| 8 | Document360 document360.com Best for: AI recommends Document360 most when buyers ask “alternatives to the mainstream AI documentation generation platforms for developers” (75% of those answers) | 25.4% 95% CI 16.5–36.9% 17 mentions · avg pos 10.3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 40.7%PERPLEXITY 22.2% | Claim |
| 9 | VS Code code.visualstudio.com Best for: AI recommends VS Code most when buyers ask “what AI tool should I use to automatically generate README files from my code” (91.7% of those answers) | 23.9% 95% CI 15.3–35.3% 16 mentions · avg pos 6.1 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 33.3%CHATGPT 33.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.8% | Claim |
| 10 | Swagger Best for: AI recommends Swagger most when buyers ask “alternatives to the mainstream AI documentation generation platforms for developers” (50% of those answers) | 20.9% 95% CI 12.9–32.1% 14 mentions · avg pos 10.3 first pick 14.3% | — | GEMINI 25.9%CHATGPT 33.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.8% | Claim |
| 11 | Notion notion.so Best for: AI recommends Notion most when buyers ask “best AI tools for developers writing technical documentation” (66.7% of those answers) | 20.9% 95% CI 12.9–32.1% 14 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 7.1% | — | GEMINI 29.6%CHATGPT 50%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 7.4% | Claim |
| 12 | Docusaurus docusaurus.io Best for: AI recommends Docusaurus most when buyers ask “which AI docs tool is best for open source projects vs internal engineering teams” (88.9% of those answers) | 19.4% 95% CI 11.7–30.4% 13 mentions · avg pos 8.2 first pick 23.1% | — | GEMINI 22.2%CHATGPT 33.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.8% | Claim |
| 13 | DeepWiki Best for: AI recommends DeepWiki most when buyers ask “alternatives to the mainstream AI documentation generation platforms for developers” (50% of those answers) | 14.9% 95% CI 8.3–25.3% 10 mentions · avg pos 5.8 first pick 10% | — | GEMINI 14.8%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 14.8% | Claim |
| 14 | Kodesage kodesage.ai Best for: AI recommends Kodesage most when buyers ask “how do I use AI to keep technical documentation in sync with code changes” (58.3% of those answers) | 14.9% 95% CI 8.3–25.3% 10 mentions · avg pos 9.7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 18.5%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 11.1% | Claim |
| 15 | GitLab gitlab.com Best for: AI recommends GitLab most when buyers ask “how do I use AI to keep technical documentation in sync with code changes” (33.3% of those answers) | 14.9% 95% CI 8.3–25.3% 10 mentions · avg pos 14 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 18.5%CHATGPT 33.3%PERPLEXITY 11.1% | Claim |
| 16 | ReadmeCodeGen readmecodegen.com Best for: AI recommends ReadmeCodeGen most when buyers ask “what AI tool should I use to automatically generate README files from my code” (83.3% of those answers) | 13.4% 95% CI 7.2–23.6% 9 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 11.1% | — | GEMINI 14.8%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.8% | Claim |
| 17 | Qodo Best for: AI recommends Qodo most when buyers ask “alternatives to the mainstream AI documentation generation platforms for developers” (50% of those answers) | 13.4% 95% CI 7.2–23.6% 9 mentions · avg pos 8.1 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 18.5%CHATGPT 16.7%PERPLEXITY 11.1% | Claim |
| 18 | Kapa Best for: AI recommends Kapa most when buyers ask “alternatives to the mainstream AI documentation generation platforms for developers” (41.7% of those answers) | 13.4% 95% CI 7.2–23.6% 9 mentions · avg pos 12.9 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 25.9%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 19 | Postman postman.com Best for: AI recommends Postman most when buyers ask “best AI assistant for auto-generating API docs and code documentation” (33.3% of those answers) | 11.9% 95% CI 6.2–21.8% 8 mentions · avg pos 6.5 first pick 12.5% | — | GEMINI 22.2%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 20 | DocuWriter | 11.9% 95% CI 6.2–21.8% 8 mentions · avg pos 7.1 first pick 12.5% | — | GEMINI 25.9%PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 21 | Apidog apidog.com | 10.4% 95% CI 5.2–20% 7 mentions · avg pos 6.8 first pick 14.3% | — | GEMINI 11.1%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 11.1% | Claim |
| 22 | Scribe scribe.com Best for: AI recommends Scribe most when buyers ask “alternatives to the mainstream AI documentation generation platforms for developers” (33.3% of those answers) | 10.4% 95% CI 5.2–20% 7 mentions · avg pos 7.3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 18.5%PERPLEXITY 7.4% | Claim |
| 23 | Theneo | 10.4% 95% CI 5.2–20% 7 mentions · avg pos 8.8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.8%PERPLEXITY 11.1% | Claim |
| 24 | Promptless Best for: AI recommends Promptless most when buyers ask “alternatives to the mainstream AI documentation generation platforms for developers” (41.7% of those answers) | 10.4% 95% CI 5.2–20% 7 mentions · avg pos 10.9 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 18.5%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 25 | Stoplight stoplight.io | 9% 95% CI 4.2–18.2% 6 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 11.1%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 7.4% | Claim |
| 26 | Tabnine tabnine.com | 9% 95% CI 4.2–18.2% 6 mentions · avg pos 8.3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.8%PERPLEXITY 7.4% | Claim |
| 27 | GPT | 9% 95% CI 4.2–18.2% 6 mentions · avg pos 15 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 11.1%CHATGPT 33.3%PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 28 | Ollama ollama.com Best for: AI recommends Ollama most when buyers ask “what AI tool should I use to automatically generate README files from my code” (41.7% of those answers) | 7.5% 95% CI 3.2–16.3% 5 mentions · avg pos 1.3 first pick 60% | — | GEMINI 14.8%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 29 | Readme AI Best for: AI recommends Readme AI most when buyers ask “what AI tool should I use to automatically generate README files from my code” (75% of those answers) | 7.5% 95% CI 3.2–16.3% 5 mentions · avg pos 1.8 first pick 40% | — | GEMINI 11.1%PERPLEXITY 7.4% | Claim |
| 30 | Documentation.AI documentation.ai Best for: AI recommends Documentation.AI most when buyers ask “alternatives to the mainstream AI documentation generation platforms for developers” (33.3% of those answers) | 7.5% 95% CI 3.2–16.3% 5 mentions · avg pos 5.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.7%PERPLEXITY 14.8% | Claim |
| 31 | JSDoc | 7.5% 95% CI 3.2–16.3% 5 mentions · avg pos 6.6 first pick 20% | — | GEMINI 7.4%CHATGPT 33.3%PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 32 | Grammarly grammarly.com Best for: AI recommends Grammarly most when buyers ask “best AI tools for developers writing technical documentation” (33.3% of those answers) | 7.5% 95% CI 3.2–16.3% 5 mentions · avg pos 9.6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 18.5% | Claim |
| 33 | GitDocs AI | 7.5% 95% CI 3.2–16.3% 5 mentions · avg pos 10.2 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.8%PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 34 | AI README Generator marketplace.visualstudio.com Best for: AI recommends AI README Generator most when buyers ask “what AI tool should I use to automatically generate README files from my code” (58.3% of those answers) | 6% 95% CI 2.3–14.4% 4 mentions · avg pos 4.3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.4%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 35 | Docsify | 6% 95% CI 2.3–14.4% 4 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.8% | Claim |
| 36 | Doxygen doxygen.nl | 6% 95% CI 2.3–14.4% 4 mentions · avg pos 6.3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.4%CHATGPT 16.7%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 37 | DeepDocs | 6% 95% CI 2.3–14.4% 4 mentions · avg pos 9.3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 11.1%PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 38 | Swagger UI | 6% 95% CI 2.3–14.4% 4 mentions · avg pos 18.8 first pick 25% | — | GEMINI 7.4%CHATGPT 16.7%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 39 | MkDocs mkdocs.org Best for: AI recommends MkDocs most when buyers ask “which AI docs tool is best for open source projects vs internal engineering teams” (33.3% of those answers) | 6% 95% CI 2.3–14.4% 4 mentions · avg pos 21.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.7%CHATGPT 16.7%CLAUDE 28.6% | Claim |
| 40 | Taskade taskade.com | 4.5% 95% CI 1.5–12.4% 3 mentions · avg pos 4.3 first pick 33.3% | — | GEMINI 11.1% | Claim |
| 41 | Ferndesk ferndesk.com | 4.5% 95% CI 1.5–12.4% 3 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.7%PERPLEXITY 7.4% | Claim |
| 42 | Falconer falconer.com Best for: AI recommends Falconer most when buyers ask “how do I use AI to keep technical documentation in sync with code changes” (41.7% of those answers) | 4.5% 95% CI 1.5–12.4% 3 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.7%PERPLEXITY 7.4% | Claim |
| 43 | AskCodi askcodi.com | 4.5% 95% CI 1.5–12.4% 3 mentions · avg pos 7.3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 11.1% | Claim |
| 44 | AutoDoc fulminoussoftware.com | 4.5% 95% CI 1.5–12.4% 3 mentions · avg pos 8.7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.4%CHATGPT 16.7% | Claim |
| 45 | Codeium codeium.com | 4.5% 95% CI 1.5–12.4% 3 mentions · avg pos 9.3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 11.1% | Claim |
| 46 | DeepL deepl.com | 4.5% 95% CI 1.5–12.4% 3 mentions · avg pos 9.3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 11.1% | Claim |
| 47 | Cursor cursor.sh | 4.5% 95% CI 1.5–12.4% 3 mentions · avg pos 13.7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.4%CHATGPT 16.7% | Claim |
| 48 | ClickHelp clickhelp.com Best for: AI recommends ClickHelp most when buyers ask “best AI tools for developers writing technical documentation” (41.7% of those answers) | 4.5% 95% CI 1.5–12.4% 3 mentions · avg pos 14 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.4%PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 49 | SSOJet ssojet.com Best for: AI recommends SSOJet most when buyers ask “which AI docs tool is best for open source projects vs internal engineering teams” (33.3% of those answers) | 4.5% 95% CI 1.5–12.4% 3 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 11.1% | Claim |
| 50 | Read the Docs readthedocs.org | 3% 95% CI 0.8–10.2% 2 mentions · avg pos 2.5 first pick 50% | — | GEMINI 3.7%PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 51 | GitRead gitread.dev Best for: AI recommends GitRead most when buyers ask “what AI tool should I use to automatically generate README files from my code” (41.7% of those answers) | 3% 95% CI 0.8–10.2% 2 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.7%PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 52 | Project Guide | 3% 95% CI 0.8–10.2% 2 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.4% | Claim |
| 53 | ReadmeBuddy | 3% 95% CI 0.8–10.2% 2 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.4% | Claim |
| 54 | River AI's README Generator | 3% 95% CI 0.8–10.2% 2 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.4% | Claim |
| 55 | Docsio docsio.co | 3% 95% CI 0.8–10.2% 2 mentions · avg pos 7.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.7%PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 56 | JetBrains AI Assistant | 3% 95% CI 0.8–10.2% 2 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.7%PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 57 | Sphinx sphinx-doc.org | 3% 95% CI 0.8–10.2% 2 mentions · avg pos 8.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.7%CHATGPT 16.7% | Claim |
| 58 | Windsurf | 3% 95% CI 0.8–10.2% 2 mentions · avg pos 10 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.4% | Claim |
| 59 | eesel AI eesel.ai Best for: AI recommends eesel AI most when buyers ask “best AI tools for developers writing technical documentation” (33.3% of those answers) | 3% 95% CI 0.8–10.2% 2 mentions · avg pos 10 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.7%PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 60 | ExplainGitHub | 3% 95% CI 0.8–10.2% 2 mentions · avg pos 10.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.4% | Claim |
| 61 | Stoplight Studio | 3% 95% CI 0.8–10.2% 2 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.4% | Claim |
| 62 | mightydocs | 3% 95% CI 0.8–10.2% 2 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.4% | Claim |
| 63 | ReadMe Ask AI | 3% 95% CI 0.8–10.2% 2 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.4% | Claim |
| 64 | Docmost docmost.com | 3% 95% CI 0.8–10.2% 2 mentions · avg pos 13 first pick 50% | — | GEMINI 3.7%CHATGPT 16.7% | Claim |
| 65 | GitIngest | 3% 95% CI 0.8–10.2% 2 mentions · avg pos 13.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.4% | Claim |
| 66 | Glean glean.com Best for: AI recommends Glean most when buyers ask “how can AI help engineering teams write better developer guides faster” (33.3% of those answers) | 3% 95% CI 0.8–10.2% 2 mentions · avg pos 14 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.7%PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 67 | WriteAssist | 3% 95% CI 0.8–10.2% 2 mentions · avg pos 14 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.4% | Claim |
| 68 | Readme.so readme.so | 3% 95% CI 0.8–10.2% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 7.4% | Claim |
| 69 | ReadmeAI / readme-ai | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions · avg pos 1 first pick 100% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 70 | Open WebUI | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.7% | Claim |
| 71 | Javadoc | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.7% | Claim |
| 72 | LocalAI | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.7% | Claim |
| 73 | kapa.ai kapa.ai | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 74 | Penify | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 75 | aidocs-cli | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.7% | Claim |
| 76 | Komment | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 77 | CodeGPT | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 78 | Inkeep | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 79 | Slate slatedocs.com | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.7% | Claim |
| 80 | Verbicode AI | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 81 | DOCKR | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions · avg pos 10 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 82 | GitSummarize | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions · avg pos 10 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.7% | Claim |
| 83 | Pieces for Developers pieces.app | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions · avg pos 13 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 16.7% | Claim |
| 84 | CodeSee | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions · avg pos 16 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.7% | Claim |
| 85 | QuillBot quillbot.com | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions · avg pos 16 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.7% | Claim |
| 86 | CodeWiki | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 87 | Dev.to dev.to | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 88 | Docker docker.com | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 89 | Fern Docs | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 90 | Knowl.ai | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 91 | Readme.io readme.io | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 92 | Red Hat Developer Portal developers.redhat.com Best for: AI recommends Red Hat Developer Portal most when buyers ask “how do I use AI to keep technical documentation in sync with code changes” (41.7% of those answers) | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 93 | Startup Stash startupstash.com Best for: AI recommends Startup Stash most when buyers ask “which AI docs tool is best for open source projects vs internal engineering teams” (44.4% of those answers) | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 94 | Treblle treblle.com | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 95 | Workik | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
| 96 | Workik AI workik.com | 1.5% 95% CI 0.3–8% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.7% | Claim |
Reading the numbers: Share is a point estimate on 67 sampled answers, so each row also shows its 95% CI — the Wilson score interval around that share. When two products' intervals overlap, the gap between them isn't statistically meaningful at this sample size. First pick is the share of a product's recommending answers where it was named first, which separates “always mentioned” from “usually the top recommendation”. Full methodology.
Independence: Orbator customers are badged for disclosure. Customer status does not affect prompts, sampling, extraction, or ranking — see the methodology. Your product on this list? Claim it to see the prompts behind your rank and track it weekly.
What AI recommends in adjacent categories — same method, fresh weekly.
Not in the answer? That's fixable.
Check Your AI Visibility →© 2026 Orbator. All rights reserved.