What AI assistants actually recommend when buyers ask about ai tools for doctors and clinicians — measured on a rolling 4-week window across 4 engines, published as open data.
Updated 2026-09-18 · 28 sampled answers · rolling 4-week window · methodology
Rankings are measured from sampled AI answers — never editorial, never paid. Orbator builds AI-visibility tooling; when Orbator itself appears in any category, it is measured by the same rules as everyone else.
Measured by Orbatormethodology owner Henrik Tellewindow ends Sep 18, 2026
Sample: 28 AI answers · Window: Aug 21, 2026 – Sep 18, 2026 (4-week rolling) · trend vs prior 4 weeks (84 answers)
Samples by engine: GEMINI 7 (last run Aug 29, 2026) · CHATGPT 7 (last run Aug 29, 2026) · CLAUDE 7 (last run Aug 30, 2026) · PERPLEXITY 7 (last run Aug 29, 2026) · GROK 0 (last run Aug 8, 2026 — stalest)
How these numbers are made: sampling design · prompt provenance · what counts as a mention · what we cannot see
On the record: This ranking is frozen as a dated snapshot every day. View this category's history to see what entered and left the ranking and when, or read what the engines actually said on a given day.
Across 28 sampled AI answers from 4 engines, Abridge is recommended most often — appearing in 53.6% of recommendations, followed by Freed (53.6%) and Scribe (50%).
This is a measurement of share of voice across 4 AI engines — not an editorial pick. See the full ranking below.
Orbator asked Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity buyer questions about ai tools for doctors and clinicians and sampled 28 answers between Aug 21, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026. Recommendation share counts the answers that recommended or listed a product, so a passing mention or a warning adds nothing to it. A category publishes once it holds at least 20 independently sampled answers in the window. Read the full methodology or download this ranking as CSV.
The seven sampled prompts split across five intents, and the leaders change with the question. Abridge led the best_in_category prompts about physicians, clinical staff and documentation assistants, recommended in 90% of those 10 runs. Scribe led the two problem-solving prompts about generating visit summaries and reducing administrative burnout, recommended in 50% of those 10 runs, and led the primary care versus specialist comparison prompt at 60% of 5 runs. Freed led the direct recommendation prompt about cutting documentation time, at 60% of 5 runs. On the alternatives prompt, Abridge, Freed and Heidi each reached 100% of 5 runs.
So the shortlist depends on how the question is framed. A buyer asking a broad category question and a buyer asking a workflow question drew different answers from the same window. No pricing facts are recorded for any of the five products in this snapshot.
| # | Product | Share | Trend | Engines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | abridge.com | 53.6% 95% CI 35.8–70.5% 15 mentions · avg pos 4.7 first pick 26.7% | — | GEMINI 57.1%CHATGPT 57.1%CLAUDE 57.1%PERPLEXITY 42.9% | Claim |
| 2 | getfreed.ai | 53.6% 95% CI 35.8–70.5% 15 mentions · avg pos 5.2 first pick 6.7% | — | GEMINI 57.1%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 57.1%PERPLEXITY 71.4% | Claim |
| 3 | scribe.com | 50% 95% CI 32.6–67.4% 14 mentions · avg pos 2.9 first pick 50% | — | GEMINI 71.4%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 71.4%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 4 | heidihealth.com | 50% 95% CI 32.6–67.4% 14 mentions · avg pos 4.1 first pick 21.4% | — | GEMINI 57.1%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 71.4%PERPLEXITY 57.1% | Claim |
| 5 | suki.ai | 42.9% 95% CI 26.5–60.9% 12 mentions · avg pos 3.3 first pick 8.3% | — | GEMINI 42.9%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 57.1%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 6 | epic.com | 39.3% 95% CI 23.6–57.6% 11 mentions · avg pos 3.9 first pick 36.4% | — | GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 71.4%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 7 | DAX | 35.7% 95% CI 20.7–54.2% 10 mentions · avg pos 4.6 first pick 20% | — | GEMINI 42.9%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 57.1%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 8 | nabla.com | 35.7% 95% CI 20.7–54.2% 10 mentions · avg pos 5.1 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 57.1%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 9 | doximity.com | 28.6% 95% CI 15.3–47.1% 8 mentions · avg pos 5.6 first pick 12.5% | — | CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 57.1%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 10 | microsoft.com | 25% 95% CI 12.7–43.4% 7 mentions · avg pos 2.7 first pick 28.6% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 11 | Nuance DAX | 25% 95% CI 12.7–43.4% 7 mentions · avg pos 4.9 first pick 14.3% | — | GEMINI 28.6%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 12 | PatientNotes | 25% 95% CI 12.7–43.4% 7 mentions · avg pos 8.4 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 42.9%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 13 | Dragon Copilot | 21.4% 95% CI 10.2–39.5% 6 mentions · avg pos 1.5 first pick 50% | — | CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 14 | AI Scribe | 21.4% 95% CI 10.2–39.5% 6 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 33.3% | — | GEMINI 42.9%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 15 | ambiencehealthcare.com | 21.4% 95% CI 10.2–39.5% 6 mentions · avg pos 6.2 first pick 16.7% | — | GEMINI 42.9%CHATGPT 28.6%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 16 | Ambient AI | 17.9% 95% CI 7.9–35.6% 5 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 20% | — | GEMINI 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 17 | OpenEvidence | 17.9% 95% CI 7.9–35.6% 5 mentions · avg pos 4.6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 18 | deepscribe.com | 17.9% 95% CI 7.9–35.6% 5 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 28.6% | Claim |
| 19 | Freed AI | 17.9% 95% CI 7.9–35.6% 5 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 28.6%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 20 | Ambience Healthcare | 17.9% 95% CI 7.9–35.6% 5 mentions · avg pos 5.6 first pick 20% | — | GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 28.6%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 21 | cerner.com | 14.3% 95% CI 5.7–31.5% 4 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 25% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 22 | glass.health | 14.3% 95% CI 5.7–31.5% 4 mentions · avg pos 5.3 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 23 | uptodate.com | 14.3% 95% CI 5.7–31.5% 4 mentions · avg pos 5.5 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 24 | DAX Copilot | 14.3% 95% CI 5.7–31.5% 4 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 25 | Nuance DAX Copilot | 14.3% 95% CI 5.7–31.5% 4 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 26 | learn.microsoft.com | 10.7% 95% CI 3.7–27.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 42.9% | Claim |
| 27 | athenahealth.com | 10.7% 95% CI 3.7–27.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 3.7 first pick 33.3% | — | CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 28.6% | Claim |
| 28 | verahealth.ai | 10.7% 95% CI 3.7–27.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 5.7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 29 | sunoh.ai | 10.7% 95% CI 3.7–27.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 7.7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 28.6%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 30 | trytwofold.com | 10.7% 95% CI 3.7–27.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 8.3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 31 | ambient listening technology | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 1 first pick 100% | — | GEMINI 28.6% | Claim |
| 32 | wolterskluwer.com | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 2.5 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 33 | dynamed.com | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 34 | deepcura.com | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 35 | Tali | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 8.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 36 | upheal.com | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 28.6% | Claim |
| 37 | Twofold Health | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 10 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 38 | Tali AI | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 11.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 39 | GPT | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 17 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 40 | keragon.com | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 18 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 28.6% | Claim |
| 41 | athenhealth.com | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 42 | Microsoft Dragon Copilot | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 1 first pick 100% | — | PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 43 | athenaAmbient | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 44 | aidoc.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 45 | Ambient Clinical Intelligence | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 46 | Augmedix | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 47 | bland.ai | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 48 | NoteMD | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 49 | praxisemr.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 50 | aws.amazon.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 51 | Microsoft DAX | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 52 | ScribePT | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 53 | Sully | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 54 | Sully AI | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 55 | tandem.chat | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 56 | omnimd.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 57 | tempus.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 58 | eclinicalworks.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 59 | soapnoteai.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 60 | drchrono.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 61 | clinicalnotes.ai | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 13 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 62 | ScribeBerry | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 13 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 63 | medisummary.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 20 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 64 | wisprflow.ai | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 20 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 65 | mediscan.ai | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 23 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 66 | pabau.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 24 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 67 | tebra.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 26 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
Reading the numbers: Share is a point estimate on 28 sampled answers, so each row also shows its 95% CI — the Wilson score interval around that share. When two products' intervals overlap, the gap between them isn't statistically meaningful at this sample size. First pick is the share of a product's recommending answers where it was named first, which separates “always mentioned” from “usually the top recommendation”. Full methodology.
Independence: Orbator customers are badged for disclosure. Customer status does not affect prompts, sampling, extraction, or ranking — see the methodology. Your product on this list? Claim it to see the prompts behind your rank and track it weekly.
Watch this category
These rankings move. Get one email a week on who AI recommends in AI tools for doctors and clinicians. No account needed.
Head-to-head pages for products ranked in AI tools for doctors and clinicians. Each one sets out sourced facts side by side, plus which product AI assistants recommend more, engine by engine.
Scribe holds a recommendation share of 54.3% of 35 sampled answers in the 4-week window to 2026-09-05. Its mention breakdown splits into 9 recommended and 10 listed. It was first recommendation in 9 runs, a first_rec_rate of 47.4%, the highest of the five. Engine spread runs from 71.4% of Claude's 14 answers and 71.4% of Gemini's 7 answers down to 28.6% of ChatGPT's 7 answers.
Abridge also sits at 54.3% of 35 sampled answers in the same window, with 11 recommended and 8 listed, the largest recommended count in the top five. It was mentioned in 21 runs overall. Claude, Gemini and ChatGPT each recommended it in 57.1% of their answers, on 14, 7 and 7 runs. Perplexity was lowest at 42.9% of its 7 answers.
Freed matches at 54.3% of 35 sampled answers, split 8 recommended and 11 listed. Its first_rec_rate is 5.3%. Perplexity recommended it most, 71.4% of that engine's 7 answers, and ChatGPT least, 28.6% of 7.
Heidi reached 51.4% of 35 sampled answers, with 9 recommended and 9 listed. Claude recommended it in 64.3% of 14 answers, ChatGPT in 14.3% of 7.
Suki reached 48.6% of 35 sampled answers, with 7 recommended and 10 listed. High engine Claude at 64.3% of 14 answers, low engine Perplexity at 28.6% of 7.
The four engines did not settle on one leader among the top five. Claude recommended Scribe most, at 71.4% of Claude's 14 answers in the 4-week window to 2026-09-05. Gemini also led with Scribe, at 71.4% of Gemini's 7 answers. ChatGPT led with Abridge, at 57.1% of ChatGPT's 7 answers. Perplexity led with Freed, at 71.4% of Perplexity's 7 answers.
The widest gap between engines belongs to Heidi. ChatGPT recommended it in 14.3% of its 7 answers. Claude recommended it in 64.3% of its 14 answers. That is a spread of 50 points across the same window. Scribe shows a split of the same shape, recommended by Claude and Gemini at 71.4% and by ChatGPT and Perplexity at 28.6% of their 7 answers each. A shortlist drawn from one engine will not match a shortlist drawn from another.
This is the first measured window on record for AI tools for doctors and clinicians. It runs 2026-08-08 to 2026-09-05, 28 days, and covers 35 sampled answers across four engines. There is no prior window to compare against, so no entries, exits or share moves are recorded yet.
Three products share the lead. Scribe, Abridge and Freed each hold a recommendation share of 54.3% of those 35 answers. Heidi follows at 51.4% and Suki at 48.6%. The confidence intervals overlap heavily, 38.2 to 69.5 for the three leaders and 33 to 64.4 for Suki, so the rank order between them is not settled by this window alone. Scribe was first recommendation in 9 runs, more than any other product here. The next window will show whether that holds.
Every number on this page is measured from sampled answers, and those answers are kept. The archive holds dated excerpts of what each engine answered, never full answers. Read the answer archive for ai tools for doctors and clinicians to see the excerpts by date and engine, or view the ranking history to see what entered and left this ranking and when.
Across 28 sampled AI answers from 4 engines (Aug 21, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026), Abridge is recommended most often for ai tools for doctors and clinicians, appearing in 53.6% of recommendations, followed by Freed (53.6%). This is a measurement of what AI assistants recommend, not an editorial verdict.
ChatGPT recommends Abridge most often for ai tools for doctors and clinicians. It appears as a recommendation in 57.1% of ChatGPT's sampled answers in this window (Aug 21, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026). Other engines answer differently. The per-engine breakdown in the ranking shows each one.
Orbator samples AI answers to buyer questions across 4 engines and counts how often each product is recommended. No product pays for placement. The ai tools for doctors and clinicians ranking is based on 28 answers in the current 4-week window (Aug 21, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026). Full methodology is published at https://www.orbator.io/ai-index/methodology.
Verified facts for the most-recommended products — each sourced and dated. No editorial scoring, just the data side by side.
What AI recommends in adjacent categories — same method, fresh weekly.
Not in the answer? That's fixable.
Check Your AI Visibility →© 2026 Orbator. All rights reserved.