What AI assistants actually recommend when buyers ask about ai tools for graphic designers — measured on a rolling 4-week window across 4 engines, published as open data.
Updated 2026-09-18 · 28 sampled answers · rolling 4-week window · methodology
Rankings are measured from sampled AI answers — never editorial, never paid. Orbator builds AI-visibility tooling; when Orbator itself appears in any category, it is measured by the same rules as everyone else.
Measured by Orbatormethodology owner Henrik Tellewindow ends Sep 18, 2026
Sample: 28 AI answers · Window: Aug 21, 2026 – Sep 18, 2026 (4-week rolling) · trend vs prior 4 weeks (84 answers)
Samples by engine: GEMINI 7 (last run Aug 31, 2026) · CHATGPT 7 (last run Aug 31, 2026) · CLAUDE 7 (last run Sep 2, 2026) · PERPLEXITY 7 (last run Aug 31, 2026) · GROK 0 (last run Aug 10, 2026 — stalest)
How these numbers are made: sampling design · prompt provenance · what counts as a mention · what we cannot see
On the record: This ranking is frozen as a dated snapshot every day. View this category's history to see what entered and left the ranking and when, or read what the engines actually said on a given day.
Across 28 sampled AI answers from 4 engines, Canva is recommended most often — appearing in 75% of recommendations, followed by Firefly (71.4%) and Figma (67.9%).
This is a measurement of share of voice across 4 AI engines — not an editorial pick. See the full ranking below.
Orbator asked Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity buyer questions about ai tools for graphic designers and sampled 28 answers between Aug 21, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026. Recommendation share counts the answers that recommended or listed a product, so a passing mention or a warning adds nothing to it. A category publishes once it holds at least 20 independently sampled answers in the window. Read the full methodology or download this ranking as CSV.
Buyer prompts in this window split five ways, and the leaders change with the question. For "best AI tools for graphic designers" and the other best_in_category prompts (18 runs), Firefly led on 94.4%, with Canva and Midjourney both at 88.9%. On problem_solving prompts about mockups from a brief and client presentations (18 runs), Canva led on 55.6% and Figma followed at 44.4%. The alternatives prompt (9 runs) put Canva and Midjourney level at 66.7%. On the freelance versus in-house comparison (9 runs), Canva, Figma and Firefly were each recommended in all 9, a share of 100. On the workflow-speed recommendation prompt (9 runs), Figma and Firefly both hit 100 and Canva 88.9.
So the shortlist depends on whether the work is generation or day-to-day production. No pricing facts were recorded for any of the five, so cost is not measured here.
| # | Product | Share | Trend | Engines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | canva.com | 75% 95% CI 56.6–87.3% 21 mentions · avg pos 3.7 first pick 19% | — | GEMINI 85.7%CHATGPT 57.1%CLAUDE 71.4%PERPLEXITY 85.7% | Claim |
| 2 | firefly.adobe.com | 71.4% 95% CI 52.9–84.7% 20 mentions · avg pos 2.8 first pick 30% | — | GEMINI 71.4%CHATGPT 57.1%CLAUDE 85.7%PERPLEXITY 71.4% | Claim |
| 3 | figma.com | 67.9% 95% CI 49.3–82.1% 19 mentions · avg pos 3.8 first pick 31.6% | — | GEMINI 42.9%CHATGPT 57.1%CLAUDE 85.7%PERPLEXITY 85.7% | Claim |
| 4 | midjourney.com | 53.6% 95% CI 35.8–70.5% 15 mentions · avg pos 3.7 first pick 13.3% | — | GEMINI 57.1%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 71.4%PERPLEXITY 71.4% | Claim |
| 5 | recraft.ai | 53.6% 95% CI 35.8–70.5% 15 mentions · avg pos 4.1 first pick 13.3% | — | GEMINI 71.4%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 57.1%PERPLEXITY 57.1% | Claim |
| 6 | Adobe Firefly | 39.3% 95% CI 23.6–57.6% 11 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 27.3% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 71.4%PERPLEXITY 71.4% | Claim |
| 7 | make.com | 35.7% 95% CI 20.7–54.2% 10 mentions · avg pos 3.8 first pick 50% | — | GEMINI 42.9%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 42.9% | Claim |
| 8 | adobe.com | 32.1% 95% CI 17.9–50.7% 9 mentions · avg pos 2.8 first pick 33.3% | — | GEMINI 57.1%CHATGPT 57.1%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 9 | uizard.io | 32.1% 95% CI 17.9–50.7% 9 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 11.1% | — | GEMINI 57.1%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 10 | Photoshop | 28.6% 95% CI 15.3–47.1% 8 mentions · avg pos 2.6 first pick 37.5% | — | GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 11 | framer.com | 28.6% 95% CI 15.3–47.1% 8 mentions · avg pos 5.6 first pick 12.5% | — | GEMINI 42.9%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 12 | Illustrator | 25% 95% CI 12.7–43.4% 7 mentions · avg pos 2.5 first pick 42.9% | — | GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 42.9%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 13 | microsoft.com | 21.4% 95% CI 10.2–39.5% 6 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 33.3% | — | GEMINI 42.9%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 14 | Stable Diffusion | 21.4% 95% CI 10.2–39.5% 6 mentions · avg pos 8.7 first pick 16.7% | — | GEMINI 42.9%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 15 | Magic Design | 17.9% 95% CI 7.9–35.6% 5 mentions · avg pos 3.6 first pick 20% | — | GEMINI 42.9%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 16 | designer.microsoft.com | 17.9% 95% CI 7.9–35.6% 5 mentions · avg pos 4.6 first pick 20% | — | GEMINI 28.6%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 17 | Nano Banana | 17.9% 95% CI 7.9–35.6% 5 mentions · avg pos 5.2 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 57.1%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 18 | ideogram.ai | 17.9% 95% CI 7.9–35.6% 5 mentions · avg pos 5.4 first pick 40% | — | GEMINI 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 19 | DALL-E | 17.9% 95% CI 7.9–35.6% 5 mentions · avg pos 5.6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 42.9%CLAUDE 28.6% | Claim |
| 20 | kittl.com | 17.9% 95% CI 7.9–35.6% 5 mentions · avg pos 6.8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 28.6%PERPLEXITY 42.9% | Claim |
| 21 | uxpilot.ai | 17.9% 95% CI 7.9–35.6% 5 mentions · avg pos 7.4 first pick 20% | — | GEMINI 42.9%CLAUDE 28.6% | Claim |
| 22 | stitch.withgoogle.com | 17.9% 95% CI 7.9–35.6% 5 mentions · avg pos 7.8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 42.9%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 23 | stitchdata.com | 17.9% 95% CI 7.9–35.6% 5 mentions · avg pos 7.8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 42.9%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 24 | visme.co | 14.3% 95% CI 5.7–31.5% 4 mentions · avg pos 1.3 first pick 75% | — | GEMINI 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 25 | express.adobe.com | 14.3% 95% CI 5.7–31.5% 4 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 25% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 26 | Galileo | 14.3% 95% CI 5.7–31.5% 4 mentions · avg pos 6.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 28.6%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 27 | Galileo AI | 14.3% 95% CI 5.7–31.5% 4 mentions · avg pos 6.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 28.6%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 28 | DALL-E 3 | 14.3% 95% CI 5.7–31.5% 4 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 42.9%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 29 | sketch.com | 14.3% 95% CI 5.7–31.5% 4 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 42.9%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 30 | relume.io | 14.3% 95% CI 5.7–31.5% 4 mentions · avg pos 14.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 57.1% | Claim |
| 31 | Relume AI | 14.3% 95% CI 5.7–31.5% 4 mentions · avg pos 14.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 57.1% | Claim |
| 32 | gamma.app | 10.7% 95% CI 3.7–27.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 1.3 first pick 66.7% | — | GEMINI 14.3%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 33 | DreamStudio | 10.7% 95% CI 3.7–27.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 33.3% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 34 | uxpin.com | 10.7% 95% CI 3.7–27.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 35 | flowstep.ai | 10.7% 95% CI 3.7–27.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 9.3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 36 | vercel.com | 10.7% 95% CI 3.7–27.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 11.7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 37 | storyflow.so | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 38 | fotor.com | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 39 | visily.ai | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 3.5 first pick 50% | — | CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 40 | mockey.ai | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 41 | bfl.ai | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 5.5 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 42 | pitch.com | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 5.5 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 43 | leonardo.ai | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 50% | — | CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 44 | Nano Banana Pro | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 28.6% | Claim |
| 45 | designs.ai | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 13 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 28.6% | Claim |
| 46 | runwayml.com | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 15 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 28.6% | Claim |
| 47 | Khroma | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 20 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 28.6% | Claim |
| 48 | Looka | 7.1% 95% CI 2–22.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 20.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 28.6% | Claim |
| 49 | Decktopus | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 1 first pick 100% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 50 | Playground AI | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 1 first pick 100% | — | PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 51 | plusai.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 1 first pick 100% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 52 | SlidesAI | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 1 first pick 100% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 53 | guideflow.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 54 | picsart.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 55 | pixlr.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 56 | topazlabs.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 57 | Banani | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 58 | mockupgenerator.ai | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 59 | pebblely.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 60 | slidesgo.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 61 | vistacreat.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 62 | lovart.ai | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 63 | Lunacy | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 64 | Moonchild AI | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 65 | Packify | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 66 | penpot.app | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 67 | webflow.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 68 | envato.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 69 | letsenhance.io | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 70 | miro.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 71 | piktochart.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 72 | format.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 73 | Krea | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 74 | OpenArt | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 75 | grammarly.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 76 | copy.ai | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 77 | jasper.ai | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 78 | lovable.dev | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 79 | invideo.io | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 14 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 80 | bolt.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 15 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 81 | bolt.new | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 15 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 82 | Freepik | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 15 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 83 | pictory.ai | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 16 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 84 | magnific.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 20 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 85 | cursor.sh | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 22 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 86 | Adobe Photoshop | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 87 | Black Forest Labs FLUX | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 88 | freepik.com | 3.6% 95% CI 0.6–17.7% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
Reading the numbers: Share is a point estimate on 28 sampled answers, so each row also shows its 95% CI — the Wilson score interval around that share. When two products' intervals overlap, the gap between them isn't statistically meaningful at this sample size. First pick is the share of a product's recommending answers where it was named first, which separates “always mentioned” from “usually the top recommendation”. Full methodology.
Independence: Orbator customers are badged for disclosure. Customer status does not affect prompts, sampling, extraction, or ranking — see the methodology. Your product on this list? Claim it to see the prompts behind your rank and track it weekly.
Watch this category
These rankings move. Get one email a week on who AI recommends in AI tools for graphic designers. No account needed.
Head-to-head pages for products ranked in AI tools for graphic designers. Each one sets out sourced facts side by side, plus which product AI assistants recommend more, engine by engine.
Canva ranks first, recommended in 77.8% of 63 sampled answers in the 4-week window to 2026-09-05. It over-indexes on the prompt about alternatives to the most popular AI design generation tools, recommended in all 9 of those runs, a share of 100. Its mention breakdown splits 35 recommended against 14 listed, with 6 in context. Gemini recommended it most, 92.9% of Gemini's 14 answers, and ChatGPT least, 50% of ChatGPT's 14 answers.
Figma ranks second at 73% of 63 sampled answers in the same window, and also tops the alternatives prompt with 100% across 9 runs. The split is 40 recommended to 6 listed, plus 8 context mentions. Grok recommended it in all 7 of Grok's answers, 100%, while Gemini sat lowest at 50% of Gemini's 14 answers.
Firefly ranks third at 69.8% of 63 sampled answers, again leading the alternatives prompt with 100% of 9 runs. Its breakdown is 36 recommended to 8 listed, with 6 context mentions. Grok recommended it in 85.7% of Grok's 7 answers, ChatGPT in 57.1% of ChatGPT's 14.
Midjourney ranks fourth at 61.9% of 63 sampled answers, over-indexing on "best AI tools for graphic designers" with 100% across 9 runs. Its split is 32 recommended to 7 listed, with 3 context mentions. Claude recommended it in 85.7% of Claude's 14 answers, ChatGPT in 14.3% of ChatGPT's 14. Thin coverage on ChatGPT if that is the assistant your buyers use.
Adobe Firefly ranks fifth at 44.4% of 63 sampled answers, with 88.9% of the 9 alternatives runs. The split is 25 recommended to 3 listed, plus 6 context mentions. Claude recommended it in 71.4% of Claude's 14 answers. ChatGPT did not recommend it in any of its 14.
The five engines did not converge on one leader. Among the top five, Claude recommended Midjourney most across its 14 answers. Gemini led with Canva across its 14 answers, and Perplexity did the same across its 14. Grok led with Figma across its 7 answers, and ChatGPT also led with Figma across its 14.
Midjourney carries the widest gap. ChatGPT recommended it in 14.3% of ChatGPT's 14 answers, Claude in 85.7% of Claude's 14, a spread of 71.4 points. Adobe Firefly shows a related pattern at the other end of the table, recommended in 71.4% of Claude's 14 answers and in 0% of ChatGPT's 14. A shortlist drawn from one assistant will not match a shortlist drawn from another.
This is the first measured window on record for AI tools for graphic designers. It runs from 2026-08-08 to 2026-09-05, 28 days, and covers 63 sampled answers across five engines. There is no prior window to compare against, so no product entered or left the top ten and no share change can be reported yet.
Canva leads it, recommended in 77.8% of those 63 answers. Figma follows at 73%, Firefly at 69.8%, Midjourney at 61.9% and Adobe Firefly at 44.4%. First-position recommendations sit differently: Firefly was named first in 29.5% of its 44 recommendation runs, ahead of Figma at 23.9% and Canva at 20.4%. The next window, resampled roughly monthly, gives the first comparison point.
Every number on this page is measured from sampled answers, and those answers are kept. The archive holds dated excerpts of what each engine answered, never full answers. Read the answer archive for ai tools for graphic designers to see the excerpts by date and engine, or view the ranking history to see what entered and left this ranking and when.
Across 28 sampled AI answers from 4 engines (Aug 21, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026), Canva is recommended most often for ai tools for graphic designers, appearing in 75% of recommendations, followed by Firefly (71.4%). This is a measurement of what AI assistants recommend, not an editorial verdict.
ChatGPT recommends Canva most often for ai tools for graphic designers. It appears as a recommendation in 57.1% of ChatGPT's sampled answers in this window (Aug 21, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026). Other engines answer differently. The per-engine breakdown in the ranking shows each one.
Orbator samples AI answers to buyer questions across 4 engines and counts how often each product is recommended. No product pays for placement. The ai tools for graphic designers ranking is based on 28 answers in the current 4-week window (Aug 21, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026). Full methodology is published at https://www.orbator.io/ai-index/methodology.
Verified facts for the most-recommended products — each sourced and dated. No editorial scoring, just the data side by side.
| Recraftrecraft.ai | Uizarduizard.io | Microsoftmicrosoft.com | Ideogramideogram.ai | UX Pilotuxpilot.ai | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | — | Pro: $12 a month (free tier available) ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | — | Plus: $20 a month ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | Free ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 |
| Features | background removal ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | Wireframe Scanner ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | cloud storage ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | — | Generate Designs & Wireframes ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 |
| Platforms | — | — | PC ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | — | Web ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 |
| Integrations | — | Figma ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | — | — | Figma ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 |
What AI recommends in adjacent categories — same method, fresh weekly.
Not in the answer? That's fixable.
Check Your AI Visibility →© 2026 Orbator. All rights reserved.