What AI assistants actually recommend when buyers ask about b2b intent data platforms — measured weekly across 4 engines, published as open data.
Updated 2026-08-02 · 70 sampled answers · rolling 4-week window · methodology
Rankings are measured from sampled AI answers — never editorial, never paid. Orbator builds AI-visibility tooling; when Orbator itself appears in any category, it is measured by the same rules as everyone else.
Sample: 70 AI answers · Window: Jul 5, 2026 – Aug 2, 2026 (4-week rolling) · trend vs prior 4 weeks (51 answers)
Across 70 sampled AI answers from 4 engines, Bombora is recommended most often — appearing in 68.6% of recommendations, followed by ZoomInfo (65.7%) and 6sense (55.7%).
This is a measurement of share of voice across 4 AI engines — not an editorial pick. See the full ranking below.
| # | Product | Share | Trend | Engines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bombora bombora.com Best for: AI recommends Bombora most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to large enterprise B2B intent data providers” (100% of those answers) | 68.6% 95% CI 57–78.2% 48 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 33.3% | — | GEMINI 67.9%CHATGPT 71.4%CLAUDE 71.4%PERPLEXITY 67.9% | Claim |
| 2 | ZoomInfo pipeline.zoominfo.com Best for: AI recommends ZoomInfo most when buyers ask “best B2B intent data platforms for identifying in-market buyers” (100% of those answers) | 65.7% 95% CI 54–75.8% 46 mentions · avg pos 8.7 first pick 4.3% | — | GEMINI 71.4%CHATGPT 57.1%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 67.9% | Claim |
| 3 | 6sense 6sense.com Best for: AI recommends 6sense most when buyers ask “best B2B intent data platforms for identifying in-market buyers” (100% of those answers) | 55.7% 95% CI 44.1–66.8% 39 mentions · avg pos 4.7 first pick 25.6% | — | GEMINI 53.6%CHATGPT 57.1%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 60.7% | Claim |
| 4 | Demandbase demandbase.com Best for: AI recommends Demandbase most when buyers ask “best B2B intent data platforms for identifying in-market buyers” (100% of those answers) | 52.9% 95% CI 41.3–64.1% 37 mentions · avg pos 5.1 first pick 2.7% | — | GEMINI 50%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 64.3% | Claim |
| 5 | Outreach.io outreach.io Best for: AI recommends Outreach.io most when buyers ask “how do I use intent data to prioritize which accounts my sales team should focus on” (100% of those answers) | 47.1% 95% CI 35.9–58.7% 33 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 15.2% | — | GEMINI 57.1%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 50% | Claim |
| 6 | G2 Buyer Intent Best for: AI recommends G2 Buyer Intent most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to large enterprise B2B intent data providers” (75% of those answers) | 47.1% 95% CI 35.9–58.7% 33 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 9.1% | — | GEMINI 46.4%CHATGPT 71.4%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 50% | Claim |
| 7 | Cognism cognism.com Best for: AI recommends Cognism most when buyers ask “best B2B intent data platforms for identifying in-market buyers” (83.3% of those answers) | 44.3% 95% CI 33.2–55.9% 31 mentions · avg pos 9.6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 50%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 46.4% | Claim |
| 8 | Apollo AI apollo.io Best for: AI recommends Apollo AI most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to large enterprise B2B intent data providers” (91.7% of those answers) | 38.6% 95% CI 28–50.3% 27 mentions · avg pos 5.6 first pick 29.6% | — | GEMINI 53.6%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 32.1% | Claim |
| 9 | Leadfeeder leadfeeder.com Best for: AI recommends Leadfeeder most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to large enterprise B2B intent data providers” (100% of those answers) | 31.4% 95% CI 21.8–43% 22 mentions · avg pos 5.7 first pick 18.2% | — | GEMINI 32.1%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 32.1% | Claim |
| 10 | TechTarget techtarget.com Best for: AI recommends TechTarget most when buyers ask “which intent data provider has the best coverage for technology and SaaS buying signals” (91.7% of those answers) | 31.4% 95% CI 21.8–43% 22 mentions · avg pos 6.9 first pick 4.5% | — | GEMINI 32.1%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 25% | Claim |
| 11 | Dealfront Best for: AI recommends Dealfront most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to large enterprise B2B intent data providers” (91.7% of those answers) | 24.3% 95% CI 15.8–35.5% 17 mentions · avg pos 5.4 first pick 17.6% | — | GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 17.9% | Claim |
| 12 | RB2B rb2b.io Best for: AI recommends RB2B most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to large enterprise B2B intent data providers” (50% of those answers) | 17.1% 95% CI 10.1–27.6% 12 mentions · avg pos 13.9 first pick 8.3% | — | GEMINI 21.4%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 13 | UserGems usergems.com Best for: AI recommends UserGems most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to large enterprise B2B intent data providers” (58.3% of those answers) | 17.1% 95% CI 10.1–27.6% 12 mentions · avg pos 15.8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%CHATGPT 28.6%PERPLEXITY 32.1% | Claim |
| 14 | Factors.ai factors.ai Best for: AI recommends Factors.ai most when buyers ask “best tools for using buyer intent signals to prioritize outbound sales efforts” (58.3% of those answers) | 14.3% 95% CI 7.9–24.3% 10 mentions · avg pos 15.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 10.7%CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 21.4% | Claim |
| 15 | HubSpot CRM hubspot.com Best for: AI recommends HubSpot CRM most when buyers ask “best tools for using buyer intent signals to prioritize outbound sales efforts” (66.7% of those answers) | 14.3% 95% CI 7.9–24.3% 10 mentions first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%PERPLEXITY 21.4% | Claim |
| 16 | TechTarget Priority Engine Best for: AI recommends TechTarget Priority Engine most when buyers ask “which intent data provider has the best coverage for technology and SaaS buying signals” (50% of those answers) | 12.9% 95% CI 6.9–22.7% 9 mentions · avg pos 10.1 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.1%CHATGPT 42.9%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 17 | Lusha lusha.com Best for: AI recommends Lusha most when buyers ask “best tools for using buyer intent signals to prioritize outbound sales efforts” (58.3% of those answers) | 11.4% 95% CI 5.9–21% 8 mentions · avg pos 7.1 first pick 12.5% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 18 | Autobound autobound.ai Best for: AI recommends Autobound most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to large enterprise B2B intent data providers” (50% of those answers) | 11.4% 95% CI 5.9–21% 8 mentions · avg pos 7.3 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 42.9%PERPLEXITY 17.9% | Claim |
| 19 | SalesIntel salesintel.com Best for: AI recommends SalesIntel most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to large enterprise B2B intent data providers” (41.7% of those answers) | 11.4% 95% CI 5.9–21% 8 mentions · avg pos 7.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 20 | Warmly warmly.ai Best for: AI recommends Warmly most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to large enterprise B2B intent data providers” (66.7% of those answers) | 11.4% 95% CI 5.9–21% 8 mentions · avg pos 11.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 10.7%CHATGPT 28.6%PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 21 | Saleshandy saleshandy.com Best for: AI recommends Saleshandy most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to large enterprise B2B intent data providers” (33.3% of those answers) | 11.4% 95% CI 5.9–21% 8 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%PERPLEXITY 25% | Claim |
| 22 | Seamless.AI seamless.ai Best for: AI recommends Seamless.AI most when buyers ask “best tools for using buyer intent signals to prioritize outbound sales efforts” (33.3% of those answers) | 10% 95% CI 4.9–19.2% 7 mentions · avg pos 10.7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 23 | Intentsify intentsify.io Best for: AI recommends Intentsify most when buyers ask “how do I use intent data to prioritize which accounts my sales team should focus on” (33.3% of those answers) | 8.6% 95% CI 4–17.5% 6 mentions · avg pos 4.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 24 | Crunchbase crunchbase.com Best for: AI recommends Crunchbase most when buyers ask “what should I use to find companies that are actively researching my category” (41.7% of those answers) | 8.6% 95% CI 4–17.5% 6 mentions · avg pos 5.4 first pick 16.7% | — | GEMINI 7.1%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 25 | Lead Forensics | 8.6% 95% CI 4–17.5% 6 mentions · avg pos 5.8 first pick 16.7% | — | GEMINI 7.1%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 26 | Amplemarket amplemarket.com | 8.6% 95% CI 4–17.5% 6 mentions · avg pos 10.7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.1%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 27 | Clearbit clearbit.com Best for: AI recommends Clearbit most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to large enterprise B2B intent data providers” (41.7% of those answers) | 8.6% 95% CI 4–17.5% 6 mentions · avg pos 12.2 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 28 | Abmatic abmatic.ai Best for: AI recommends Abmatic most when buyers ask “which intent data provider has the best coverage for technology and SaaS buying signals” (41.7% of those answers) | 7.1% 95% CI 3.1–15.7% 5 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 29 | Google Patents patents.google.com Best for: AI recommends Google Patents most when buyers ask “what should I use to find companies that are actively researching my category” (58.3% of those answers) | 7.1% 95% CI 3.1–15.7% 5 mentions · avg pos 4.4 first pick 20% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 30 | USPTO uspto.gov Best for: AI recommends USPTO most when buyers ask “what should I use to find companies that are actively researching my category” (58.3% of those answers) | 7.1% 95% CI 3.1–15.7% 5 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 31 | Google Scholar scholar.google.com Best for: AI recommends Google Scholar most when buyers ask “what should I use to find companies that are actively researching my category” (58.3% of those answers) | 7.1% 95% CI 3.1–15.7% 5 mentions · avg pos 5.8 first pick 20% | — | GEMINI 10.7%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 32 | Coresignal coresignal.com Best for: AI recommends Coresignal most when buyers ask “what should I use to find companies that are actively researching my category” (41.7% of those answers) | 7.1% 95% CI 3.1–15.7% 5 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.1%PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 33 | Salesmotion salesmotion.io Best for: AI recommends Salesmotion most when buyers ask “which intent data provider has the best coverage for technology and SaaS buying signals” (50% of those answers) | 7.1% 95% CI 3.1–15.7% 5 mentions · avg pos 16 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.1%CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 34 | Close close.com | 5.7% 95% CI 2.2–13.8% 4 mentions · avg pos 5.7 first pick 25% | — | GEMINI 7.1%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 35 | Lead411 lead411.com | 5.7% 95% CI 2.2–13.8% 4 mentions · avg pos 12.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 36 | Cleanlist cleanlist.ai | 5.7% 95% CI 2.2–13.8% 4 mentions · avg pos 15.3 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 57.1% | Claim |
| 37 | Visualping visualping.io Best for: AI recommends Visualping most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to large enterprise B2B intent data providers” (33.3% of those answers) | 4.3% 95% CI 1.5–11.9% 3 mentions · avg pos 1 first pick 33.3% | — | CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 38 | Insight Platforms insightplatforms.com Best for: AI recommends Insight Platforms most when buyers ask “what should I use to find companies that are actively researching my category” (33.3% of those answers) | 4.3% 95% CI 1.5–11.9% 3 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 39 | IntentData.io intentdata.io | 4.3% 95% CI 1.5–11.9% 3 mentions · avg pos 5.5 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 40 | PitchBook pitchbook.com Best for: AI recommends PitchBook most when buyers ask “what should I use to find companies that are actively researching my category” (33.3% of those answers) | 4.3% 95% CI 1.5–11.9% 3 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 41 | IBISWorld ibisworld.com Best for: AI recommends IBISWorld most when buyers ask “what should I use to find companies that are actively researching my category” (33.3% of those answers) | 4.3% 95% CI 1.5–11.9% 3 mentions · avg pos 7.3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 10.7% | Claim |
| 42 | WIPO wipo.int Best for: AI recommends WIPO most when buyers ask “what should I use to find companies that are actively researching my category” (33.3% of those answers) | 4.3% 95% CI 1.5–11.9% 3 mentions · avg pos 7.3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 10.7% | Claim |
| 43 | LeadSift leadsift.com | 4.3% 95% CI 1.5–11.9% 3 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 33.3% | — | GEMINI 7.1%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 44 | BuiltWith builtwith.com | 4.3% 95% CI 1.5–11.9% 3 mentions · avg pos 13.3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.1%CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 45 | Clay clay.com | 4.3% 95% CI 1.5–11.9% 3 mentions · avg pos 22.7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%CHATGPT 28.6% | Claim |
| 46 | Coldreach.ai coldreach.ai Best for: AI recommends Coldreach.ai most when buyers ask “best tools for using buyer intent signals to prioritize outbound sales efforts” (41.7% of those answers) | 4.3% 95% CI 1.5–11.9% 3 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 47 | Madison Logic madisonlogic.com Best for: AI recommends Madison Logic most when buyers ask “how do I use intent data to prioritize which accounts my sales team should focus on” (33.3% of those answers) | 4.3% 95% CI 1.5–11.9% 3 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 48 | Chorus by ZoomInfo zoominfo.com | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions · avg pos 1.5 first pick 50% | — | GEMINI 3.6%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 49 | Marketo marketo.com | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 50 | Lead Onion | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions · avg pos 4.5 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 51 | SimilarWeb similarweb.com | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions · avg pos 5.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.1% | Claim |
| 52 | Statista statista.com | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions · avg pos 5.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.1% | Claim |
| 53 | SEC sec.gov | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 54 | PatSnap patsnap.com | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.1% | Claim |
| 55 | PubMed pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions · avg pos 10 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 56 | MarketBetter marketbetter.ai | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions · avg pos 10.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 57 | Web of Science | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions · avg pos 11.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.1% | Claim |
| 58 | Salesloft salesloft.com | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions · avg pos 20 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.1% | Claim |
| 59 | Catch Intent catchintent.com | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 60 | Demand Science demandscience.com Best for: AI recommends Demand Science most when buyers ask “first-party intent signals vs third-party intent data platforms for ABM programs” (41.7% of those answers) | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 61 | GuideFlow guideflow.com Best for: AI recommends GuideFlow most when buyers ask “best tools for using buyer intent signals to prioritize outbound sales efforts” (33.3% of those answers) | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 62 | HockeyStack hockeystack.com Best for: AI recommends HockeyStack most when buyers ask “how do I use intent data to prioritize which accounts my sales team should focus on” (33.3% of those answers) | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 63 | Jasmine Directory jasminedirectory.com Best for: AI recommends Jasmine Directory most when buyers ask “what should I use to find companies that are actively researching my category” (33.3% of those answers) | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 64 | Landbase landbase.com Best for: AI recommends Landbase most when buyers ask “best tools for using buyer intent signals to prioritize outbound sales efforts” (33.3% of those answers) | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 65 | Martal martal.ca | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 66 | Pollfish pollfish.com | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 67 | Untitled getuntitled.ai | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 68 | X Growth xgrowth.com.au | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 69 | nrich nrich.io Best for: AI recommends nrich most when buyers ask “which intent data provider has the best coverage for technology and SaaS buying signals” (33.3% of those answers) | 2.9% 95% CI 0.8–9.8% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 70 | Foundry | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 1 first pick 100% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 71 | Owler owler.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 1 first pick 100% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 72 | AiSDR aisdr.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 73 | Brandwatch brandwatch.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 74 | CB Insights cbinsights.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 75 | BuzzSumo buzzsumo.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 76 | Scopus scopus.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 77 | Feedly feedly.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 78 | Google News news.google.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 79 | IDC idc.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 10 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 80 | ResearchGate researchgate.net | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 81 | Tomba tomba.io | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 82 | IEEE Xplore ieeexplore.ieee.org | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 15 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 83 | Wappalyzer wappalyzer.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions · avg pos 24 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 84 | Artisan | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 85 | ColdIQ coldiq.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 86 | Data Axle Salesgenie salesgenie.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 87 | HG Insights hginsights.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 88 | Influ2 influ2.com Best for: AI recommends Influ2 most when buyers ask “first-party intent signals vs third-party intent data platforms for ABM programs” (33.3% of those answers) | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 89 | LeadIQ leadiq.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 90 | Onfire onfire.ai | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 91 | PageCrawl pagecrawl.io | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 92 | Propensity propensity.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 93 | SourceForge sourceforge.net | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 94 | Zen ABM zenabm.com Best for: AI recommends Zen ABM most when buyers ask “first-party intent signals vs third-party intent data platforms for ABM programs” (41.7% of those answers) | 1.4% 95% CI 0.3–7.7% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
Reading the numbers: Share is a point estimate on 70 sampled answers, so each row also shows its 95% CI — the Wilson score interval around that share. When two products' intervals overlap, the gap between them isn't statistically meaningful at this sample size. First pick is the share of a product's recommending answers where it was named first, which separates “always mentioned” from “usually the top recommendation”. Full methodology.
Independence: Orbator customers are badged for disclosure. Customer status does not affect prompts, sampling, extraction, or ranking — see the methodology. Your product on this list? Claim it to see the prompts behind your rank and track it weekly.
What AI recommends in adjacent categories — same method, fresh weekly.
Not in the answer? That's fixable.
Check Your AI Visibility →© 2026 Orbator. All rights reserved.