A fact-by-fact comparison of Joomla and Paid Memberships Pro — sourced and dated — plus the part no generic comparison shows: which one AI assistants actually recommend more, engine by engine.
Measured by Orbatormethodology owner Henrik Tellewindow ends Sep 6, 2026
Recommendation share = the % of sampled AI answers, over a 4-week rolling window, that recommend each product. Higher is better.
CLAUDE
Joomla
0.1%
Paid Memberships Pro
0.1%
GEMINI
Joomla
0.3%
Paid Memberships Pro
0.1%
GROK
Joomla
0.4%
Paid Memberships Pro
0.1%
CHATGPT
Joomla
0.1%
Paid Memberships Pro
0%
PERPLEXITY
Joomla
0.1%
Paid Memberships Pro
0%
Features
Platforms
Features
Integrations
Platforms
Does AI recommend Joomla or Paid Memberships Pro more?
Joomla is recommended more often: it appears in 0.2% of sampled AI answers versus 0.1% for Paid Memberships Pro, measured across the live AI engines over a rolling 4-week window.
Which AI engines were used to compare Joomla and Paid Memberships Pro?
Recommendation share is measured on CLAUDE, GEMINI, GROK, CHATGPT, PERPLEXITY using neutral, buyer-shaped prompts (no product names), aggregated over a 4-week rolling window. See the methodology for prompt design and sample sizes.
Own one of these products? Claim your profile to keep its facts accurate.
Recommendation share and entity resolution follow the Index methodology. Facts are sourced from each vendor's own pages and re-verified periodically. Customer status does not affect measurement. Free to use with attribution to orbator.io.
© 2026 Orbator. All rights reserved.