What AI assistants actually recommend when buyers ask about error monitoring tools — measured weekly across 5 engines, published as open data.
Updated 2026-08-04 · 82 sampled answers · rolling 4-week window · methodology
Rankings are measured from sampled AI answers — never editorial, never paid. Orbator builds AI-visibility tooling; when Orbator itself appears in any category, it is measured by the same rules as everyone else.
Sample: 82 AI answers · Window: Jul 7, 2026 – Aug 4, 2026 (4-week rolling) · trend vs prior 4 weeks (56 answers)
Across 82 sampled AI answers from 5 engines, Sentry is recommended most often — appearing in 93.9% of recommendations, followed by Rollbar (75.6%) and Bugsnag (70.7%).
This is a measurement of share of voice across 5 AI engines — not an editorial pick. See the full ranking below.
| # | Product | Share | Trend | Engines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sentry sentry.io | 93.9% 95% CI 86.5–97.4% 77 mentions · avg pos 2.8 first pick 58.4% | — | GROK 100%GEMINI 88.5%CHATGPT 100%CLAUDE 92.9%PERPLEXITY 96.4% | Claim |
| 2 | Rollbar rollbar.com Best for: AI recommends Rollbar most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to the leading application error monitoring platforms” (100% of those answers) | 75.6% 95% CI 65.3–83.6% 62 mentions · avg pos 5.6 first pick 3.2% | — | GROK 85.7%GEMINI 80.8%CHATGPT 100%CLAUDE 85.7%PERPLEXITY 57.1% | Claim |
| 3 | Bugsnag bugsnag.com Best for: AI recommends Bugsnag most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to the leading application error monitoring platforms” (92.9% of those answers) | 70.7% 95% CI 60.1–79.5% 58 mentions · avg pos 6.3 first pick 1.7% | — | GROK 71.4%GEMINI 80.8%CHATGPT 100%CLAUDE 71.4%PERPLEXITY 53.6% | Claim |
| 4 | Datadog datadoghq.com Best for: AI recommends Datadog most when buyers ask “best error monitoring tools for production web applications” (92.9% of those answers) | 54.9% 95% CI 44.1–65.2% 45 mentions · avg pos 8.6 first pick 6.7% | — | GROK 85.7%GEMINI 42.3%CHATGPT 100%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 53.6% | Claim |
| 5 | GlitchTip glitchtip.com Best for: AI recommends GlitchTip most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to the leading application error monitoring platforms” (92.9% of those answers) | 43.9% 95% CI 33.7–54.7% 36 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 19.4% | — | GROK 57.1%GEMINI 34.6%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 53.6% | Claim |
| 6 | Honeybadger Best for: AI recommends Honeybadger most when buyers ask “best application error tracking software for small engineering teams” (100% of those answers) | 41.5% 95% CI 31.4–52.3% 34 mentions · avg pos 8.2 first pick 2.9% | — | GROK 42.9%GEMINI 38.5%CHATGPT 71.4%CLAUDE 35.7%PERPLEXITY 39.3% | Claim |
| 7 | New Relic newrelic.com Best for: AI recommends New Relic most when buyers ask “error monitoring tools vs full APM platforms for small teams” (92.9% of those answers) | 40.2% 95% CI 30.3–51.1% 33 mentions · avg pos 9.2 first pick 6.1% | — | GROK 71.4%GEMINI 38.5%CHATGPT 71.4%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 39.3% | Claim |
| 8 | Raygun raygun.com Best for: AI recommends Raygun most when buyers ask “best error monitoring tools for production web applications” (78.6% of those answers) | 39% 95% CI 29.2–49.8% 32 mentions · avg pos 8.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 57.1%GEMINI 53.8%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 7.1%PERPLEXITY 42.9% | Claim |
| 9 | Slack slack.com Best for: AI recommends Slack most when buyers ask “how do I get alerted when my application crashes in production” (100% of those answers) | 31.7% 95% CI 22.6–42.4% 26 mentions · avg pos 7.4 first pick 11.5% | — | GROK 42.9%GEMINI 38.5%CHATGPT 57.1%CLAUDE 21.4%PERPLEXITY 21.4% | Claim |
| 10 | LogRocket logrocket.com Best for: AI recommends LogRocket most when buyers ask “best error monitoring tools for production web applications” (78.6% of those answers) | 29.3% 95% CI 20.5–39.9% 24 mentions · avg pos 5.3 first pick 8.3% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 30.8%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 42.9% | Claim |
| 11 | Airbrake Best for: AI recommends Airbrake most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to the leading application error monitoring platforms” (71.4% of those answers) | 25.6% 95% CI 17.4–36% 21 mentions · avg pos 5.6 first pick 0% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 38.5%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 7.1%PERPLEXITY 25% | Claim |
| 12 | PostHog posthog.com Best for: AI recommends PostHog most when buyers ask “best application error tracking software for small engineering teams” (53.8% of those answers) | 23.2% 95% CI 15.4–33.4% 19 mentions · avg pos 5.9 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 19.2%CLAUDE 21.4%PERPLEXITY 39.3% | Claim |
| 13 | SigNoz signoz.io Best for: AI recommends SigNoz most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to the leading application error monitoring platforms” (64.3% of those answers) | 19.5% 95% CI 12.4–29.4% 16 mentions · avg pos 9.3 first pick 6.3% | — | GROK 42.9%GEMINI 30.8%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 7.1%PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 14 | TrackJS Best for: AI recommends TrackJS most when buyers ask “what should I use to track JavaScript errors in my web app in real time” (64.3% of those answers) | 14.6% 95% CI 8.6–23.9% 12 mentions · avg pos 4.5 first pick 8.3% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 15.4%CLAUDE 21.4%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 15 | PagerDuty pagerduty.com Best for: AI recommends PagerDuty most when buyers ask “how do I get alerted when my application crashes in production” (64.3% of those answers) | 14.6% 95% CI 8.6–23.9% 12 mentions · avg pos 8.8 first pick 16.7% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 11.5%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 21.4%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 16 | Firebase Crashlytics Best for: AI recommends Firebase Crashlytics most when buyers ask “how do I get alerted when my application crashes in production” (57.1% of those answers) | 13.4% 95% CI 7.7–22.4% 11 mentions · avg pos 5.3 first pick 18.2% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 19.2%CLAUDE 7.1%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 17 | Scout scoutapm.com Best for: AI recommends Scout most when buyers ask “error monitoring tools vs full APM platforms for small teams” (57.1% of those answers) | 13.4% 95% CI 7.7–22.4% 11 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 15.4%PERPLEXITY 17.9% | Claim |
| 18 | Inspectlet inspectlet.com Best for: AI recommends Inspectlet most when buyers ask “what should I use to track JavaScript errors in my web app in real time” (78.6% of those answers) | 12.2% 95% CI 6.8–21% 10 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 15.4%PERPLEXITY 17.9% | Claim |
| 19 | Highlight.io highlight.io | 9.8% 95% CI 5–18.1% 8 mentions · avg pos 4.3 first pick 12.5% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 3.8%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 20 | Honeybadger.io honeybadger.io Best for: AI recommends Honeybadger.io most when buyers ask “what should I use to track JavaScript errors in my web app in real time” (42.9% of those answers) | 9.8% 95% CI 5–18.1% 8 mentions · avg pos 6.3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.7%CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 17.9% | Claim |
| 21 | Firebase firebase.google.com Best for: AI recommends Firebase most when buyers ask “how do I get alerted when my application crashes in production” (50% of those answers) | 9.8% 95% CI 5–18.1% 8 mentions · avg pos 6.8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 11.5%CLAUDE 7.1%PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 22 | Better Stack betterstack.com Best for: AI recommends Better Stack most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to the leading application error monitoring platforms” (50% of those answers) | 9.8% 95% CI 5–18.1% 8 mentions · avg pos 8.9 first pick 0% | — | GROK 28.6%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 23 | Prometheus prometheus.io | 9.8% 95% CI 5–18.1% 8 mentions · avg pos 25.1 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 7.7%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 21.4% | Claim |
| 24 | Bugsink bugsink.com | 8.5% 95% CI 4.2–16.6% 7 mentions · avg pos 7.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 42.9%CLAUDE 21.4%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 25 | Grafana Cloud | 8.5% 95% CI 4.2–16.6% 7 mentions · avg pos 25.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 7.7%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 7.1% | Claim |
| 26 | Dynatrace dynatrace.com Best for: AI recommends Dynatrace most when buyers ask “error monitoring tools vs full APM platforms for small teams” (35.7% of those answers) | 7.3% 95% CI 3.4–15.1% 6 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 16.7% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 7.7%CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 27 | AWS aws.amazon.com | 7.3% 95% CI 3.4–15.1% 6 mentions · avg pos 28.8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 3.8%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 7.1% | Claim |
| 28 | Loki | 7.3% 95% CI 3.4–15.1% 6 mentions · avg pos 30.6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.7%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 29 | CubeAPM cubeapm.com Best for: AI recommends CubeAPM most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to the leading application error monitoring platforms” (50% of those answers) | 6.1% 95% CI 2.6–13.5% 5 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GROK 28.6%CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 30 | AppSignal appsignal.com | 6.1% 95% CI 2.6–13.5% 5 mentions · avg pos 8.4 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 3.8%CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 31 | Atatus | 6.1% 95% CI 2.6–13.5% 5 mentions · avg pos 12.4 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 19.2% | Claim |
| 32 | Opsgenie atlassian.com Best for: AI recommends Opsgenie most when buyers ask “how do I get alerted when my application crashes in production” (35.7% of those answers) | 6.1% 95% CI 2.6–13.5% 5 mentions · avg pos 15.2 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 3.8%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 33 | SolarWinds Observability solarwinds.com Best for: AI recommends SolarWinds Observability most when buyers ask “how do I get alerted when my application crashes in production” (50% of those answers) | 4.9% 95% CI 1.9–11.9% 4 mentions · avg pos 5.7 first pick 25% | — | GEMINI 11.5%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 34 | SmartBear | 4.9% 95% CI 1.9–11.9% 4 mentions · avg pos 10 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 7.7%CLAUDE 7.1% | Claim |
| 35 | Temps temps.sh | 3.7% 95% CI 1.3–10.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.7%CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 36 | OpenObserve openobserve.ai | 3.7% 95% CI 1.3–10.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 7.7% | Claim |
| 37 | Uptrace | 3.7% 95% CI 1.3–10.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 8.7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 7.7% | Claim |
| 38 | Tempo | 3.7% 95% CI 1.3–10.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 9.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.7%CLAUDE 7.1% | Claim |
| 39 | UXCam uxcam.com | 3.7% 95% CI 1.3–10.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 9.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 3.8%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 40 | Pingdom pingdom.com Best for: AI recommends Pingdom most when buyers ask “how do I get alerted when my application crashes in production” (35.7% of those answers) | 3.7% 95% CI 1.3–10.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 41 | OneUptime oneuptime.com | 3.7% 95% CI 1.3–10.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 12.3 first pick 33.3% | — | GROK 42.9% | Claim |
| 42 | PM2 pm2.keymetrics.io | 3.7% 95% CI 1.3–10.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 16.7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 7.1% | Claim |
| 43 | Alertmanager | 3.7% 95% CI 1.3–10.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 20.7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 7.1% | Claim |
| 44 | Elasticsearch elastic.co Best for: AI recommends Elasticsearch most when buyers ask “how do I get alerted when my application crashes in production” (35.7% of those answers) | 3.7% 95% CI 1.3–10.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 36 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.8%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 7.1% | Claim |
| 45 | Splunk splunk.com | 3.7% 95% CI 1.3–10.2% 3 mentions · avg pos 37 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 7.1% | Claim |
| 46 | Errbit | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 3.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.7% | Claim |
| 47 | ShotMark shotmark.dev | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 48 | StatusCake | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 8.5 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 49 | ELK Stack Best for: AI recommends ELK Stack most when buyers ask “how do I get alerted when my application crashes in production” (42.9% of those answers) | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.8%CLAUDE 7.1% | Claim |
| 50 | Mimir | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 13 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.8%CLAUDE 7.1% | Claim |
| 51 | ELK | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 22 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 7.1% | Claim |
| 52 | SSOJet ssojet.com | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 52 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 28.6% | Claim |
| 53 | Nurbak Watch nurbak.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions · avg pos 1 first pick 100% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 54 | VictorOps | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 55 | FullStory fullstory.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 56 | Datadog Log Management datadog.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.8% | Claim |
| 57 | Uptime Robot uptimerobot.com Best for: AI recommends Uptime Robot most when buyers ask “how do I get alerted when my application crashes in production” (35.7% of those answers) | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 7.1% | Claim |
| 58 | Core Web Vitals web.dev | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 59 | Honeycomb honeycomb.io | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.8% | Claim |
| 60 | Middleware middleware.io | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions · avg pos 14 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 61 | Azure API Management azure.microsoft.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions · avg pos 24 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 62 | Apigee cloud.google.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions · avg pos 25 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 63 | Grafana Loki | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions · avg pos 33 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 64 | OpenSearch opensearch.org | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions · avg pos 33 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 65 | Elastic Stack | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions · avg pos 68 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 66 | Dev.to dev.to Best for: AI recommends Dev.to most when buyers ask “which error monitoring tool has the best source map support for front-end errors” (30.8% of those answers) | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 67 | Dotcom-Monitor dotcom-monitor.com Best for: AI recommends Dotcom-Monitor most when buyers ask “best error monitoring tools for production web applications” (42.9% of those answers) | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 68 | F6S f6s.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 69 | GuideFlow guideflow.com Best for: AI recommends GuideFlow most when buyers ask “best application error tracking software for small engineering teams” (38.5% of those answers) | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 70 | QuickLink chromewebstore.google.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 71 | SourceForge sourceforge.net | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 72 | Twilio twilio.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.6% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
Reading the numbers: Share is a point estimate on 82 sampled answers, so each row also shows its 95% CI — the Wilson score interval around that share. When two products' intervals overlap, the gap between them isn't statistically meaningful at this sample size. First pick is the share of a product's recommending answers where it was named first, which separates “always mentioned” from “usually the top recommendation”. Full methodology.
Independence: Orbator customers are badged for disclosure. Customer status does not affect prompts, sampling, extraction, or ranking — see the methodology. Your product on this list? Claim it to see the prompts behind your rank and track it weekly.
What AI recommends in adjacent categories — same method, fresh weekly.
Not in the answer? That's fixable.
Check Your AI Visibility →© 2026 Orbator. All rights reserved.