AI Index / Landing page builders

Best Landing page builders

What AI assistants actually recommend when buyers ask about landing page builders — measured on a rolling 4-week window across 4 engines, published as open data.

Updated 2026-09-18 · 28 sampled answers · rolling 4-week window · methodology

Rankings are measured from sampled AI answers — never editorial, never paid. Orbator builds AI-visibility tooling; when Orbator itself appears in any category, it is measured by the same rules as everyone else.

Rolling 4-week window28 samples4 enginesmethodologydata studies

Measured by Orbatormethodology owner Henrik Tellewindow ends Sep 18, 2026

Sample: 28 AI answers · Window: Aug 21, 2026Sep 18, 2026 (4-week rolling) · trend vs prior 4 weeks (42 answers)

Samples by engine: GEMINI 7 (last run Aug 22, 2026) · CHATGPT 7 (last run Aug 22, 2026) · CLAUDE 7 (last run Aug 23, 2026) · PERPLEXITY 7 (last run Aug 22, 2026) · GROK 0 (last run Jul 31, 2026 — stalest)

How these numbers are made: sampling design · prompt provenance · what counts as a mention · what we cannot see

On the record: This ranking is frozen as a dated snapshot every day. View this category's history to see what entered and left the ranking and when, or read what the engines actually said on a given day.

What is the best landing page builders?

Across 28 sampled AI answers from 4 engines, Unbounce is recommended most often — appearing in 67.9% of recommendations, followed by Instapage (50%) and Carrd (50%).

This is a measurement of share of voice across 4 AI engines — not an editorial pick. See the full ranking below.

How this ranking is measured

Orbator asked Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity buyer questions about landing page builders and sampled 28 answers between Aug 21, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026. Recommendation share counts the answers that recommended or listed a product, so a passing mention or a warning adds nothing to it. A category publishes once it holds at least 20 independently sampled answers in the window. Read the full methodology or download this ranking as CSV.

How to choose Landing page builders

Buyers in this window asked seven prompt types, and the leaders shift by intent. On best_in_category prompts (8 runs), Instapage and Unbounce were each recommended in 100%, with Leadpages at 87.5%. On problem_solving prompts (8 runs), also about building a converting page without a developer and A/B testing, Unbounce led at 62.5%, then Carrd at 50%. On alternatives prompts (4 runs), where the ask is a simpler substitute for expensive funnel platforms, Carrd led at 75%. On comparison prompts (4 runs) covering dedicated landing page tools against website builders, Unbounce led at 50%. On recommendation prompts (4 runs) about SaaS templates, Framer and Unbounce were each recommended in 100%.

Only one pricing fact is on record. Unbounce lists Starter at $29 a month, last verified 2026-09-05. Weigh the intent that matches your own question first.

Written from this window's measured data · not yet reviewed

recommendedlistedneutral mentionwarned againstRecommendation share counts answers that recommend or list it — neutral mentions and warnings shown for transparency
#ProductShareTrendEngines
1

unbounce.com

67.9%

95% CI 49.382.1%

19 mentions · avg pos 2.7

first pick 47.4%

GEMINI 57.1%CHATGPT 71.4%CLAUDE 85.7%PERPLEXITY 57.1%
Claim
Pricing: Starter: $29 a month ↗ source · verified Sep 5, 2026
Features: Drag-and-drop builder ↗ source · verified Sep 5, 2026
Integrations: Hubspot ↗ source · verified Sep 5, 2026
2

instapage.com

50%

95% CI 32.667.4%

14 mentions · avg pos 2.6

first pick 7.1%

GEMINI 57.1%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 71.4%PERPLEXITY 42.9%
Claim
3

carrd.co

50%

95% CI 32.667.4%

14 mentions · avg pos 3.9

first pick 21.4%

GEMINI 42.9%CHATGPT 57.1%CLAUDE 57.1%PERPLEXITY 42.9%
Claim
4

leadpages.com

50%

95% CI 32.667.4%

14 mentions · avg pos 3.9

first pick 7.1%

GEMINI 57.1%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 57.1%PERPLEXITY 57.1%
Claim
5

framer.com

28.6%

95% CI 15.347.1%

8 mentions · avg pos 3.4

first pick 50%

GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 14.3%
Claim
6

webflow.com

28.6%

95% CI 15.347.1%

8 mentions · avg pos 4.6

first pick 0%

GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 57.1%CLAUDE 28.6%
Claim
Features: Drag-and-drop templates ↗ source · verified Sep 5, 2026
Platforms: Web ↗ source · verified Sep 5, 2026
Integrations: Cursor ↗ source · verified Sep 5, 2026
7

landingi.com

28.6%

95% CI 15.347.1%

8 mentions · avg pos 4.7

first pick 0%

GEMINI 42.9%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 28.6%
Claim
8

swipepages.com

25%

95% CI 12.743.4%

7 mentions · avg pos 7.4

first pick 0%

GEMINI 57.1%CLAUDE 42.9%
Claim
9

wordpress.com

21.4%

95% CI 10.239.5%

6 mentions · avg pos 5.8

first pick 0%

GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 14.3%
Claim
Pricing: Personal: $9 a month (free tier available) ↗ source · verified Sep 5, 2026
Features: Guided website builder ↗ source · verified Sep 5, 2026
Integrations: Titan Email ↗ source · verified Sep 5, 2026
10

wix.com

21.4%

95% CI 10.239.5%

6 mentions · avg pos 6.5

first pick 0%

GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 28.6%
Claim
11

clickfunnels.com

17.9%

95% CI 7.935.6%

5 mentions · avg pos 4

first pick 20%

GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3%
Claim
12

mailerlite.com

17.9%

95% CI 7.935.6%

5 mentions · avg pos 6.6

first pick 0%

GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 28.6%
Claim
13

make.com

14.3%

95% CI 5.731.5%

4 mentions · avg pos 5.3

first pick 0%

GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3%
Claim
14

convertri.com

10.7%

95% CI 3.727.2%

3 mentions · avg pos 4.5

first pick 0%

GEMINI 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3%
Claim
15

heyflow.com

10.7%

95% CI 3.727.2%

3 mentions · avg pos 5

first pick 0%

CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 14.3%
Claim
16

elementor.com

10.7%

95% CI 3.727.2%

3 mentions · avg pos 7.3

first pick 0%

GEMINI 28.6%PERPLEXITY 14.3%
Claim
17

getperspective.ai

10.7%

95% CI 3.727.2%

3 mentions · avg pos 8.5

first pick 0%

GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3%
Claim
18

vwo.com

10.7%

95% CI 3.727.2%

3 mentions · avg pos 12.7

first pick 0%

GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3%
Claim
19

involve.me

10.7%

95% CI 3.727.2%

3 mentions · avg pos 13

first pick 0%

GEMINI 28.6%PERPLEXITY 14.3%
Claim
20

meta.com

7.1%

95% CI 222.6%

2 mentions · avg pos 1

first pick 100%

CHATGPT 28.6%
Claim
21

sites.google.com

7.1%

95% CI 222.6%

2 mentions · avg pos 2

first pick 0%

GEMINI 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3%
Claim
22

systeme.io

7.1%

95% CI 222.6%

2 mentions · avg pos 6

first pick 0%

GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3%
Claim
23

zoho.com

7.1%

95% CI 222.6%

2 mentions · avg pos 9

first pick 0%

GEMINI 28.6%
Claim
24

getresponse.com

7.1%

95% CI 222.6%

2 mentions · avg pos 13

first pick 0%

GEMINI 28.6%
Claim
25

optimizely.com

7.1%

95% CI 222.6%

2 mentions · avg pos 13.5

first pick 0%

GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%
Claim
26

hubspot.com

7.1%

95% CI 222.6%

2 mentions

first pick 0%

CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3%
Claim
27

analytics.google.com

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 1

first pick 100%

GEMINI 14.3%
Claim
28

unicornplatform.com

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 1

first pick 100%

GEMINI 14.3%
Claim
29

emergent.sh

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 2

first pick 0%

CLAUDE 14.3%
Claim
30

brizy.io

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 3

first pick 0%

PERPLEXITY 14.3%
Claim
31

crazyegg.com

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 4

first pick 0%

CLAUDE 14.3%
Claim
32

hotjar.com

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 4

first pick 0%

CLAUDE 14.3%
Claim
33

tally.so

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 4

first pick 0%

CHATGPT 14.3%
Claim
34

seedprod.com

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 5

first pick 0%

CLAUDE 14.3%
Claim
35

wordpress.org

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 5

first pick 0%

CLAUDE 14.3%
Claim
36

optimizepress.com

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 6

first pick 0%

CLAUDE 14.3%
Claim
37
Typedream

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 6

first pick 0%

CHATGPT 14.3%
Claim
38

thrivecart.com

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 8

first pick 0%

CLAUDE 14.3%
Claim
39

softr.io

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 11

first pick 0%

GEMINI 14.3%
Claim
Pricing: Basic: $19 a month (free tier available) ↗ source · verified Sep 5, 2026
Features: Granular permissions ↗ source · verified Sep 5, 2026
Integrations: PostgreSQL ↗ source · verified Sep 5, 2026
40

abtasty.com

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 16

first pick 0%

CLAUDE 14.3%
Claim
41
Google Optimize

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 16

first pick 0%

CLAUDE 14.3%
Claim
42

hostinger.com

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 16

first pick 0%

GEMINI 14.3%
Claim
43

mailchimp.com

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 19

first pick 0%

GEMINI 14.3%
Claim
44

segment.com

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 25

first pick 0%

CLAUDE 14.3%
Claim
45

canva.com

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

PERPLEXITY 14.3%
Claim
46

notion.so

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

CHATGPT 14.3%
Claim
47

vercel.com

3.6%

95% CI 0.617.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

CHATGPT 14.3%
Claim
Pricing: Pro: $20 a month (free tier available) ↗ source · verified Sep 5, 2026
Features: Web Application Firewall ↗ source · verified Sep 5, 2026
Platforms: Web ↗ source · verified Sep 5, 2026
Integrations: Slack ↗ source · verified Sep 5, 2026

Reading the numbers: Share is a point estimate on 28 sampled answers, so each row also shows its 95% CI — the Wilson score interval around that share. When two products' intervals overlap, the gap between them isn't statistically meaningful at this sample size. First pick is the share of a product's recommending answers where it was named first, which separates “always mentioned” from “usually the top recommendation”. Full methodology.

Independence: Orbator customers are badged for disclosure. Customer status does not affect prompts, sampling, extraction, or ranking — see the methodology. Your product on this list? Claim it to see the prompts behind your rank and track it weekly.

Watch this category

These rankings move. Get one email a week on who AI recommends in Landing page builders. No account needed.

Compare the leaders

Head-to-head pages for products ranked in Landing page builders. Each one sets out sourced facts side by side, plus which product AI assistants recommend more, engine by engine.

The top five Landing page builders, one by one

Unbounce ranks first with a recommendation share of 67.9% of 28 sampled answers in the 4-week window to 2026-09-05. Its mention breakdown splits into 12 recommended and 7 listed, with 4 in context. Claude recommended it in 85.7% of Claude's 7 answers, its highest engine; Gemini and Perplexity sat lowest at 57.1% of each engine's 7 answers. Starter is listed at $29 a month, last verified 2026-09-05.

Instapage ranks second at 50% of 28 sampled answers in the same window. The breakdown is 7 recommended and 7 listed, with 4 in context. Claude was highest at 71.4% of Claude's 7 answers, ChatGPT lowest at 28.6% of ChatGPT's 7 answers.

Carrd ranks third at 50% of 28 sampled answers. Its breakdown is 9 recommended and 5 listed, with no context mentions. Claude and ChatGPT both reached 57.1% of each engine's 7 answers; Gemini and Perplexity sat at 42.9%.

Leadpages ranks fourth at 50% of 28 sampled answers, split 8 recommended and 6 listed, with 5 in context. Claude, Gemini and Perplexity each recommended it in 57.1% of their 7 answers, ChatGPT in 28.6%.

Framer ranks fifth at 28.6% of 28 sampled answers, with 7 recommended and 1 listed. ChatGPT was highest at 42.9% of ChatGPT's 7 answers, Perplexity lowest at 14.3%.

Written from this window's measured data · not yet reviewed

Where the engines disagree

All four engines recommended the same product most among the top five. Unbounce led for Claude across Claude's 7 answers, for Gemini across Gemini's 7 answers, for ChatGPT across ChatGPT's 7 answers, and for Perplexity across Perplexity's 7 answers. No engine put a different name at the top of the measured set.

The disagreement sits one rank down. Instapage carries the widest gap between engines, recommended in 28.6% of ChatGPT's 7 answers and 71.4% of Claude's 7 answers, a spread of 42.8 points. Same product, two very different answer patterns. A buyer testing this category against a single assistant will get a narrower picture than the four-engine set shows, particularly for Instapage.

Written from this window's measured data · not yet reviewed

What moved this window

This is the first measured window on record for landing page builders. It runs 2026-08-08 to 2026-09-05, 28 days, on 28 sampled answers across four engines with 7 runs each. There is no prior window to compare against, so no entries, exits or share moves are reported yet.

Unbounce leads the window at a recommendation share of 67.9% of those 28 answers, and it was the first product recommended in 9 of the 19 runs where it appeared, a first-recommendation rate of 47.4%. Instapage, Carrd and Leadpages each sit at 50% of 28 answers. Framer follows at 28.6%, with a first-recommendation rate of 50%. Confidence intervals are wide at this sample size, with Unbounce spanning 49.3 to 82.1. The next window gives the first comparison point.

Written from this window's measured data · not yet reviewed

What the engines actually said

Every number on this page is measured from sampled answers, and those answers are kept. The archive holds dated excerpts of what each engine answered, never full answers. Read the answer archive for landing page builders to see the excerpts by date and engine, or view the ranking history to see what entered and left this ranking and when.

Questions buyers ask about Landing page builders

What is the best landing page builders?

Across 28 sampled AI answers from 4 engines (Aug 21, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026), Unbounce is recommended most often for landing page builders, appearing in 67.9% of recommendations, followed by Instapage (50%). This is a measurement of what AI assistants recommend, not an editorial verdict.

What does ChatGPT recommend for landing page builders?

ChatGPT recommends Unbounce most often for landing page builders. It appears as a recommendation in 71.4% of ChatGPT's sampled answers in this window (Aug 21, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026). Other engines answer differently. The per-engine breakdown in the ranking shows each one.

How is this measured?

Orbator samples AI answers to buyer questions across 4 engines and counts how often each product is recommended. No product pays for placement. The landing page builders ranking is based on 28 answers in the current 4-week window (Aug 21, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026). Full methodology is published at https://www.orbator.io/ai-index/methodology.

Compare the top landing page builders side by side

Verified facts for the most-recommended products — each sourced and dated. No editorial scoring, just the data side by side.

Unbounceunbounce.comWebflowwebflow.comWordPresswordpress.comSoftrsoftr.ioVercelvercel.com
PricingStarter: $29 a month ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026Personal: $9 a month (free tier available) ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026Basic: $19 a month (free tier available) ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026Pro: $20 a month (free tier available) ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026
FeaturesDrag-and-drop builder ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026Drag-and-drop templates ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026Guided website builder ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026Granular permissions ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026Web Application Firewall ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026
PlatformsWeb ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026Web ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026
IntegrationsHubspot ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026Cursor ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026Titan Email ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026PostgreSQL ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026Slack ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026

Related categories

What AI recommends in adjacent categories — same method, fresh weekly.

Not in the answer? That's fixable.

Check Your AI Visibility →
[ORBATOR]

© 2026 Orbator. All rights reserved.