What AI assistants actually recommend when buyers ask about open-source developer documentation tools — measured weekly across 5 engines, published as open data.
Updated 2026-08-02 · 77 sampled answers · rolling 4-week window · methodology
Rankings are measured from sampled AI answers — never editorial, never paid. Orbator builds AI-visibility tooling; when Orbator itself appears in any category, it is measured by the same rules as everyone else.
Sample: 77 AI answers · Window: Jul 5, 2026 – Aug 2, 2026 (4-week rolling) · trend vs prior 4 weeks (21 answers)
Across 77 sampled AI answers from 5 engines, Docusaurus is recommended most often — appearing in 97.4% of recommendations, followed by MkDocs (84.4%) and Git (61%).
This is a measurement of share of voice across 5 AI engines — not an editorial pick. See the full ranking below.
| # | Product | Share | Trend | Engines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Docusaurus docusaurus.io | 97.4% 95% CI 91–99.3% 75 mentions · avg pos 4.5 first pick 29.3% | — | GROK 100%GEMINI 100%CHATGPT 100%CLAUDE 71.4%PERPLEXITY 100% | Claim |
| 2 | MkDocs mkdocs.org Best for: AI recommends MkDocs most when buyers ask “best self-hosted docs platform for a team that wants to write in Markdown and version with Git” (100% of those answers) | 84.4% 95% CI 74.7–90.9% 65 mentions · avg pos 4.7 first pick 21.5% | — | GROK 85.7%GEMINI 96.4%CHATGPT 100%CLAUDE 57.1%PERPLEXITY 75% | Claim |
| 3 | Git git-scm.com Best for: AI recommends Git most when buyers ask “best self-hosted docs platform for a team that wants to write in Markdown and version with Git” (100% of those answers) | 61% 95% CI 49.9–71.2% 47 mentions · avg pos 6.3 first pick 34% | — | GROK 85.7%GEMINI 67.9%CHATGPT 85.7%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 46.4% | Claim |
| 4 | Material Best for: AI recommends Material most when buyers ask “how do I self-host a documentation site generator for a large open-source project” (76.9% of those answers) | 58.4% 95% CI 47.3–68.8% 45 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 20% | — | GROK 85.7%GEMINI 67.9%CHATGPT 100%CLAUDE 57.1%PERPLEXITY 32.1% | Claim |
| 5 | BookStack bookstackapp.com Best for: AI recommends BookStack most when buyers ask “open-source documentation tools for internal engineering wikis vs public-facing product docs — what fits each” (100% of those answers) | 48.1% 95% CI 37.3–59% 37 mentions · avg pos 8.5 first pick 18.9% | — | GROK 57.1%GEMINI 46.4%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 57.1% | Claim |
| 6 | Redoc redoc.ly Best for: AI recommends Redoc most when buyers ask “what open-source docs tool should I use for a product with both API reference and conceptual guides” (92.3% of those answers) | 44.2% 95% CI 33.6–55.3% 34 mentions · avg pos 10.4 first pick 2.9% | — | GROK 57.1%GEMINI 35.7%CHATGPT 57.1%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 46.4% | Claim |
| 7 | Wiki.js js.wiki Best for: AI recommends Wiki.js most when buyers ask “open-source documentation tools for internal engineering wikis vs public-facing product docs — what fits each” (100% of those answers) | 41.6% 95% CI 31.2–52.7% 32 mentions · avg pos 9.1 first pick 15.6% | — | GROK 57.1%GEMINI 39.3%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 46.4% | Claim |
| 8 | Material for MkDocs squidfunk.github.io Best for: AI recommends Material for MkDocs most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source documentation alternatives to heavy enterprise developer portal platforms” (53.8% of those answers) | 36.4% 95% CI 26.5–47.5% 28 mentions · avg pos 6.3 first pick 25% | — | GROK 42.9%GEMINI 60.7%CHATGPT 85.7%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 9 | Hugo gohugo.io Best for: AI recommends Hugo most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source documentation alternatives to heavy enterprise developer portal platforms” (76.9% of those answers) | 35.1% 95% CI 25.3–46.2% 27 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 3.7% | — | GROK 57.1%GEMINI 42.9%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 57.1%PERPLEXITY 17.9% | Claim |
| 10 | GitBook gitbook.com Best for: AI recommends GitBook most when buyers ask “open-source documentation alternatives to popular hosted developer docs platforms” (92.3% of those answers) | 35.1% 95% CI 25.3–46.2% 27 mentions · avg pos 9.9 first pick 3.7% | — | GROK 71.4%GEMINI 21.4%CHATGPT 28.6%PERPLEXITY 50% | Claim |
| 11 | Docsify Best for: AI recommends Docsify most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source documentation alternatives to heavy enterprise developer portal platforms” (84.6% of those answers) | 33.8% 95% CI 24.2–44.9% 26 mentions · avg pos 9.2 first pick 0% | — | GROK 42.9%GEMINI 46.4%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 12 | Sphinx sphinx-doc.org Best for: AI recommends Sphinx most when buyers ask “how do I self-host a documentation site generator for a large open-source project” (69.2% of those answers) | 33.8% 95% CI 24.2–44.9% 26 mentions · avg pos 10.8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 71.4%GEMINI 53.6%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 13 | Docmost docmost.com Best for: AI recommends Docmost most when buyers ask “open-source documentation tools for internal engineering wikis vs public-facing product docs — what fits each” (84.6% of those answers) | 33.8% 95% CI 24.2–44.9% 26 mentions · avg pos 11.1 first pick 7.7% | — | GROK 57.1%GEMINI 35.7%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 32.1% | Claim |
| 14 | GitHub Pages pages.github.com Best for: AI recommends GitHub Pages most when buyers ask “how do I self-host a documentation site generator for a large open-source project” (61.5% of those answers) | 33.8% 95% CI 24.2–44.9% 26 mentions · avg pos 13.7 first pick 7.7% | — | GROK 85.7%GEMINI 46.4%CHATGPT 57.1%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 15 | Read the Docs readthedocs.org Best for: AI recommends Read the Docs most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source documentation alternatives to heavy enterprise developer portal platforms” (61.5% of those answers) | 28.6% 95% CI 19.7–39.5% 22 mentions · avg pos 6.8 first pick 4.5% | — | GROK 42.9%GEMINI 39.3%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 16 | Docker docker.com Best for: AI recommends Docker most when buyers ask “how do I self-host a documentation site generator for a large open-source project” (100% of those answers) | 28.6% 95% CI 19.7–39.5% 22 mentions · avg pos 15.2 first pick 13.6% | — | GROK 57.1%GEMINI 32.1%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 17.9% | Claim |
| 17 | Notion notion.so Best for: AI recommends Notion most when buyers ask “open-source documentation tools for internal engineering wikis vs public-facing product docs — what fits each” (69.2% of those answers) | 27.3% 95% CI 18.6–38.1% 21 mentions · avg pos 11.8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 35.7%CHATGPT 28.6%PERPLEXITY 25% | Claim |
| 18 | Scalar Best for: AI recommends Scalar most when buyers ask “open-source documentation alternatives to popular hosted developer docs platforms” (61.5% of those answers) | 27.3% 95% CI 18.6–38.1% 21 mentions · avg pos 13.4 first pick 0% | — | GROK 57.1%GEMINI 21.4%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 21.4% | Claim |
| 19 | Mintlify mintlify.com Best for: AI recommends Mintlify most when buyers ask “open-source documentation alternatives to popular hosted developer docs platforms” (61.5% of those answers) | 26% 95% CI 17.5–36.7% 20 mentions · avg pos 8.9 first pick 0% | — | GROK 71.4%GEMINI 3.6%CHATGPT 28.6%PERPLEXITY 42.9% | Claim |
| 20 | Confluence Best for: AI recommends Confluence most when buyers ask “open-source documentation tools for internal engineering wikis vs public-facing product docs — what fits each” (69.2% of those answers) | 22.1% 95% CI 14.3–32.5% 17 mentions · avg pos 12.1 first pick 0% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 25%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 21.4% | Claim |
| 21 | GitLab gitlab.com Best for: AI recommends GitLab most when buyers ask “how do I self-host a documentation site generator for a large open-source project” (69.2% of those answers) | 19.5% 95% CI 12.2–29.7% 15 mentions · avg pos 15 first pick 13.3% | — | GROK 42.9%GEMINI 25%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 22 | Vitepress vitepress.dev Best for: AI recommends Vitepress most when buyers ask “how do I self-host a documentation site generator for a large open-source project” (38.5% of those answers) | 18.2% 95% CI 11.2–28.2% 14 mentions · avg pos 10.2 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 21.4% | Claim |
| 23 | NGINX nginx.org Best for: AI recommends NGINX most when buyers ask “how do I self-host a documentation site generator for a large open-source project” (100% of those answers) | 18.2% 95% CI 11.2–28.2% 14 mentions · avg pos 17.4 first pick 0% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 24 | Redocly redocly.com Best for: AI recommends Redocly most when buyers ask “best open-source developer documentation tool for publishing API references and guides” (46.2% of those answers) | 16.9% 95% CI 10.1–26.8% 13 mentions · avg pos 6.6 first pick 0% | — | GROK 42.9%GEMINI 21.4%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 25 | DapperDox Best for: AI recommends DapperDox most when buyers ask “what open-source docs tool should I use for a product with both API reference and conceptual guides” (53.8% of those answers) | 14.3% 95% CI 8.2–23.8% 11 mentions · avg pos 2.6 first pick 27.3% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 21.4%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 26 | ReadMe readme.com Best for: AI recommends ReadMe most when buyers ask “open-source documentation alternatives to popular hosted developer docs platforms” (53.8% of those answers) | 14.3% 95% CI 8.2–23.8% 11 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 57.1%CHATGPT 28.6%PERPLEXITY 17.9% | Claim |
| 27 | Netlify netlify.com | 14.3% 95% CI 8.2–23.8% 11 mentions · avg pos 11.6 first pick 0% | — | GROK 71.4%GEMINI 7.1%CHATGPT 28.6%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 28 | Algolia algolia.com | 14.3% 95% CI 8.2–23.8% 11 mentions · avg pos 13.1 first pick 18.2% | — | GROK 71.4%GEMINI 10.7%CHATGPT 42.9% | Claim |
| 29 | Python python.org | 13% 95% CI 7.2–22.3% 10 mentions · avg pos 4.9 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 21.4%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 30 | Outline getoutline.com Best for: AI recommends Outline most when buyers ask “open-source documentation tools for internal engineering wikis vs public-facing product docs — what fits each” (46.2% of those answers) | 13% 95% CI 7.2–22.3% 10 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 10% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 31 | Fern buildwithfern.com Best for: AI recommends Fern most when buyers ask “best self-hosted docs platform for a team that wants to write in Markdown and version with Git” (38.5% of those answers) | 11.7% 95% CI 6.3–20.7% 9 mentions · avg pos 2.5 first pick 11.1% | — | GEMINI 7.1%CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 21.4% | Claim |
| 32 | DokuWiki dokuwiki.org Best for: AI recommends DokuWiki most when buyers ask “open-source documentation tools for internal engineering wikis vs public-facing product docs — what fits each” (76.9% of those answers) | 11.7% 95% CI 6.3–20.7% 9 mentions · avg pos 5.7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 17.9%PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 33 | MediaWiki mediawiki.org Best for: AI recommends MediaWiki most when buyers ask “open-source documentation tools for internal engineering wikis vs public-facing product docs — what fits each” (76.9% of those answers) | 11.7% 95% CI 6.3–20.7% 9 mentions · avg pos 7.1 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 10.7%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 34 | Vercel vercel.com | 11.7% 95% CI 6.3–20.7% 9 mentions · avg pos 11.1 first pick 0% | — | GROK 57.1%GEMINI 7.1%CHATGPT 28.6%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 35 | Jekyll Best for: AI recommends Jekyll most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source documentation alternatives to heavy enterprise developer portal platforms” (46.2% of those answers) | 11.7% 95% CI 6.3–20.7% 9 mentions · avg pos 12.1 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 21.4%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 36 | Dev.to dev.to Best for: AI recommends Dev.to most when buyers ask “best open-source developer documentation tool for publishing API references and guides” (30.8% of those answers) | 11.7% 95% CI 6.3–20.7% 9 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 32.1% | Claim |
| 37 | GitHub Actions Best for: AI recommends GitHub Actions most when buyers ask “how do I self-host a documentation site generator for a large open-source project” (69.2% of those answers) | 10.4% 95% CI 5.4–19.2% 8 mentions · avg pos 28.1 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 38 | Starlight starlight.astro.build Best for: AI recommends Starlight most when buyers ask “open-source documentation alternatives to popular hosted developer docs platforms” (30.8% of those answers) | 9.1% 95% CI 4.5–17.6% 7 mentions · avg pos 8.9 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%CHATGPT 42.9%PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 39 | Astro astro.build | 9.1% 95% CI 4.5–17.6% 7 mentions · avg pos 9.4 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 3.6%CHATGPT 42.9%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 40 | Doxygen doxygen.nl | 9.1% 95% CI 4.5–17.6% 7 mentions · avg pos 10.2 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 10.7%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 41 | Caddy caddyserver.com Best for: AI recommends Caddy most when buyers ask “how do I self-host a documentation site generator for a large open-source project” (53.8% of those answers) | 9.1% 95% CI 4.5–17.6% 7 mentions · avg pos 17.9 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 42 | XWiki xwiki.com Best for: AI recommends XWiki most when buyers ask “open-source documentation tools for internal engineering wikis vs public-facing product docs — what fits each” (53.8% of those answers) | 7.8% 95% CI 3.6–16% 6 mentions · avg pos 6.8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 10.7%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 43 | Apache Hop apache.org Best for: AI recommends Apache Hop most when buyers ask “how do I self-host a documentation site generator for a large open-source project” (61.5% of those answers) | 7.8% 95% CI 3.6–16% 6 mentions · avg pos 10.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 44 | mike | 7.8% 95% CI 3.6–16% 6 mentions · avg pos 11.7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 7.1%CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 45 | Fumadocs fumadocs.vercel.app Best for: AI recommends Fumadocs most when buyers ask “open-source documentation alternatives to popular hosted developer docs platforms” (30.8% of those answers) | 7.8% 95% CI 3.6–16% 6 mentions · avg pos 16.8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 7.1%CHATGPT 28.6%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 46 | React Native | 6.5% 95% CI 2.8–14.3% 5 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 40% | — | GEMINI 7.1%CLAUDE 42.9% | Claim |
| 47 | RapiDoc | 6.5% 95% CI 2.8–14.3% 5 mentions · avg pos 4.8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 48 | Stoplight stoplight.io | 6.5% 95% CI 2.8–14.3% 5 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 10.7% | Claim |
| 49 | VuePress vuepress.vuejs.org Best for: AI recommends VuePress most when buyers ask “open-source documentation alternatives to popular hosted developer docs platforms” (30.8% of those answers) | 6.5% 95% CI 2.8–14.3% 5 mentions · avg pos 6.8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 10.7%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 50 | Slate slatedocs.com | 6.5% 95% CI 2.8–14.3% 5 mentions · avg pos 9.8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 42.9%GEMINI 7.1% | Claim |
| 51 | npm npmjs.com Best for: AI recommends npm most when buyers ask “how do I self-host a documentation site generator for a large open-source project” (30.8% of those answers) | 6.5% 95% CI 2.8–14.3% 5 mentions · avg pos 10 first pick 0% | — | GROK 28.6%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 52 | Redux Toolkit | 5.2% 95% CI 2–12.6% 4 mentions · avg pos 2.3 first pick 25% | — | GEMINI 7.1%CLAUDE 28.6% | Claim |
| 53 | HedgeDoc hedgedoc.org Best for: AI recommends HedgeDoc most when buyers ask “best self-hosted docs platform for a team that wants to write in Markdown and version with Git” (38.5% of those answers) | 5.2% 95% CI 2–12.6% 4 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 10.7%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 54 | Bump.sh bump.sh | 5.2% 95% CI 2–12.6% 4 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 28.6%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 55 | mdBook rust-lang.github.io | 5.2% 95% CI 2–12.6% 4 mentions · avg pos 8.3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 56 | Antora | 5.2% 95% CI 2–12.6% 4 mentions · avg pos 33.5 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 57 | Let's Encrypt letsencrypt.org Best for: AI recommends Let's Encrypt most when buyers ask “how do I self-host a documentation site generator for a large open-source project” (38.5% of those answers) | 5.2% 95% CI 2–12.6% 4 mentions · avg pos 34 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 7.1%CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 58 | Heroic Knowledge Base herothemes.com Best for: AI recommends Heroic Knowledge Base most when buyers ask “open-source documentation tools for internal engineering wikis vs public-facing product docs — what fits each” (38.5% of those answers) | 5.2% 95% CI 2–12.6% 4 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 59 | Swagger UI | 3.9% 95% CI 1.3–10.8% 3 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 60 | Document360 document360.com | 3.9% 95% CI 1.3–10.8% 3 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 61 | Gitea gitea.io Best for: AI recommends Gitea most when buyers ask “best self-hosted docs platform for a team that wants to write in Markdown and version with Git” (30.8% of those answers) | 3.9% 95% CI 1.3–10.8% 3 mentions · avg pos 6.7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 7.1% | Claim |
| 62 | Apidog apidog.com | 3.9% 95% CI 1.3–10.8% 3 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 63 | AWS aws.amazon.com | 3.9% 95% CI 1.3–10.8% 3 mentions · avg pos 12.7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.1%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 64 | Next.js nextjs.org | 3.9% 95% CI 1.3–10.8% 3 mentions · avg pos 17.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%CHATGPT 28.6% | Claim |
| 65 | AsciiDoc | 3.9% 95% CI 1.3–10.8% 3 mentions · avg pos 20.3 first pick 33.3% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 3.6%CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 66 | Lunr.js | 3.9% 95% CI 1.3–10.8% 3 mentions · avg pos 30 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.1%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 67 | Mermaid mermaid.js.org | 3.9% 95% CI 1.3–10.8% 3 mentions · avg pos 35.3 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%CHATGPT 28.6% | Claim |
| 68 | ClickHelp clickhelp.com Best for: AI recommends ClickHelp most when buyers ask “what open-source docs tool should I use for a product with both API reference and conceptual guides” (30.8% of those answers) | 3.9% 95% CI 1.3–10.8% 3 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 69 | Ferndesk ferndesk.com Best for: AI recommends Ferndesk most when buyers ask “what open-source docs tool should I use for a product with both API reference and conceptual guides” (30.8% of those answers) | 3.9% 95% CI 1.3–10.8% 3 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 70 | DigitalOcean digitalocean.com Best for: AI recommends DigitalOcean most when buyers ask “how do I self-host a documentation site generator for a large open-source project” (30.8% of those answers) | 2.6% 95% CI 0.7–9% 2 mentions · avg pos 8.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.1% | Claim |
| 71 | Otter Wiki | 2.6% 95% CI 0.7–9% 2 mentions · avg pos 10.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 72 | Nextra nextra.site | 2.6% 95% CI 0.7–9% 2 mentions · avg pos 11.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 73 | Swagger/OpenAPI swagger.io | 2.6% 95% CI 0.7–9% 2 mentions · avg pos 13 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 74 | sphinx-multiversion | 2.6% 95% CI 0.7–9% 2 mentions · avg pos 14 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 75 | Azure API Management azure.microsoft.com | 2.6% 95% CI 0.7–9% 2 mentions · avg pos 19 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 76 | Documize | 2.6% 95% CI 0.7–9% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 77 | Opsgenie atlassian.com | 2.6% 95% CI 0.7–9% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 78 | Slite slite.com Best for: AI recommends Slite most when buyers ask “open-source documentation tools for internal engineering wikis vs public-facing product docs — what fits each” (30.8% of those answers) | 2.6% 95% CI 0.7–9% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 79 | Draw.io draw.io | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 80 | Excalidraw excalidraw.com | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 81 | Prettier | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 82 | Django djangoproject.com | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 83 | Featurebase featurebase.app | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 84 | NumPy | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 85 | Theneo | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 86 | Arc | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 87 | Linode linode.com | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions · avg pos 10 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 88 | Apigee cloud.google.com | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 89 | Cloudflare Workers cloudflare.com | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 90 | Zudoku | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions · avg pos 20 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 91 | CircleCI circleci.com | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions · avg pos 23 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 92 | Travis CI travis-ci.com | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions · avg pos 23 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 93 | Roadie roadie.io | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions · avg pos 30 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 94 | Jenkins jenkins.io | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions · avg pos 33 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 95 | CloudCannon cloudcannon.com | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions · avg pos 38 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 96 | DocFX dotnet.github.io | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions · avg pos 67 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 97 | Guru getguru.com | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 98 | Helpcenter.io helpcenter.io | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 99 | Kodesage kodesage.ai | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 100 | ONES Project ones.com | 1.3% 95% CI 0.2–7% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
Reading the numbers: Share is a point estimate on 77 sampled answers, so each row also shows its 95% CI — the Wilson score interval around that share. When two products' intervals overlap, the gap between them isn't statistically meaningful at this sample size. First pick is the share of a product's recommending answers where it was named first, which separates “always mentioned” from “usually the top recommendation”. Full methodology.
Independence: Orbator customers are badged for disclosure. Customer status does not affect prompts, sampling, extraction, or ranking — see the methodology. Your product on this list? Claim it to see the prompts behind your rank and track it weekly.
What AI recommends in adjacent categories — same method, fresh weekly.
Not in the answer? That's fixable.
Check Your AI Visibility →© 2026 Orbator. All rights reserved.