Best Self-hosted CI/CD platforms

gitlab.com

Best for: AI recommends GitLab most when buyers ask “best self-hosted CI/CD platform for a team that wants full control over build runners” (100% of those answers)

85.7%

95% CI 73.3–92.9%

42 mentions · avg pos 4.9

first pick 31%

jenkins.io

Best for: AI recommends Jenkins most when buyers ask “best open-source CI/CD tool for a company that processes sensitive code on-premise” (100% of those answers)

83.7%

95% CI 71–91.5%

41 mentions · avg pos 3.9

first pick 39%

kubernetes.io

Best for: AI recommends Kubernetes most when buyers ask “open-source CI/CD alternatives to popular hosted pipeline services with high runner minute costs” (88.9% of those answers)

61.2%

95% CI 47.2–73.6%

30 mentions · avg pos 6.1

first pick 3.3%

Best for: AI recommends GitLab CI most when buyers ask “open-source CI/CD alternatives to popular hosted pipeline services with high runner minute costs” (100% of those answers)

51%

95% CI 37.5–64.4%

25 mentions · avg pos 4.1

first pick 20%

Best for: AI recommends Tekton most when buyers ask “best open-source CI/CD tool for a company that processes sensitive code on-premise” (66.7% of those answers)

44.9%

95% CI 31.9–58.7%

22 mentions · avg pos 4.4

first pick 4.5%

docker.com

Best for: AI recommends Docker most when buyers ask “how do I set up a self-hosted CI/CD pipeline for a monorepo with multiple services” (88.9% of those answers)

40.8%

95% CI 28.2–54.8%

20 mentions · avg pos 5.9

first pick 25%

Best for: AI recommends Drone most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source CI/CD alternatives to heavy enterprise build platforms” (88.9% of those answers)

36.7%

95% CI 24.7–50.7%

18 mentions · avg pos 3

first pick 22.2%

Best for: AI recommends GoCD most when buyers ask “open-source CI/CD alternatives to popular hosted pipeline services with high runner minute costs” (77.8% of those answers)

32.7%

95% CI 21.2–46.6%

16 mentions · avg pos 4.3

first pick 0%

woodpecker.co

Best for: AI recommends Woodpecker most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source CI/CD alternatives to heavy enterprise build platforms” (66.7% of those answers)

28.6%

95% CI 17.8–42.4%

14 mentions · avg pos 3.7

first pick 14.3%

gitea.io

Best for: AI recommends Gitea most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source CI/CD alternatives to heavy enterprise build platforms” (55.6% of those answers)

28.6%

95% CI 17.8–42.4%

14 mentions · avg pos 5.8

first pick 7.1%

jetbrains.com

Best for: AI recommends TeamCity most when buyers ask “best self-hosted CI/CD platform for a team that wants full control over build runners” (77.8% of those answers)

26.5%

95% CI 16.2–40.3%

13 mentions · avg pos 3.6

first pick 0%

buildkite.com

Best for: AI recommends Buildkite most when buyers ask “best self-hosted CI/CD platform for a team that wants full control over build runners” (66.7% of those answers)

26.5%

95% CI 16.2–40.3%

13 mentions · avg pos 5.5

first pick 7.7%

woodpecker-ci.org

Best for: AI recommends Woodpecker CI most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source CI/CD alternatives to heavy enterprise build platforms” (55.6% of those answers)

24.5%

95% CI 14.6–38.1%

12 mentions · avg pos 2.6

first pick 16.7%

concourse-ci.org

Best for: AI recommends Concourse most when buyers ask “open-source CI/CD alternatives to popular hosted pipeline services with high runner minute costs” (88.9% of those answers)

24.5%

95% CI 14.6–38.1%

12 mentions · avg pos 5.5

first pick 0%

Best for: AI recommends Concourse CI most when buyers ask “open-source CI/CD alternatives to popular hosted pipeline services with high runner minute costs” (77.8% of those answers)

22.4%

95% CI 13–35.9%

11 mentions · avg pos 5.3

first pick 0%

Best for: AI recommends Drone CI most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source CI/CD alternatives to heavy enterprise build platforms” (88.9% of those answers)

20.4%

95% CI 11.5–33.6%

10 mentions · avg pos 2.9

first pick 30%

circleci.com

Best for: AI recommends CircleCI most when buyers ask “best self-hosted CI/CD platform for a team that wants full control over build runners” (44.4% of those answers)

20.4%

95% CI 11.5–33.6%

10 mentions · avg pos 4.9

first pick 10%

argoproj.github.io

Best for: AI recommends Argo CD most when buyers ask “open-source CI/CD alternatives to popular hosted pipeline services with high runner minute costs” (55.6% of those answers)

18.4%

95% CI 10–31.4%

9 mentions · avg pos 6.4

first pick 0%

12.2%

95% CI 5.7–24.2%

6 mentions · avg pos 7

first pick 0%

forgejo.org

Best for: AI recommends Forgejo most when buyers ask “open-source CI/CD alternatives to popular hosted pipeline services with high runner minute costs” (55.6% of those answers)

12.2%

95% CI 5.7–24.2%

6 mentions · avg pos 7.2

first pick 0%

northflank.com

Best for: AI recommends Northflank most when buyers ask “best self-hosted CI/CD platform for a team that wants full control over build runners” (55.6% of those answers)

10.2%

95% CI 4.4–21.8%

5 mentions

first pick 0%

jfrog.com

Best for: AI recommends Artifactory most when buyers ask “what self-hosted CI/CD solution works best for an air-gapped enterprise environment” (44.4% of those answers)

8.2%

95% CI 3.2–19.2%

4 mentions · avg pos 5.5

first pick 25%

spinnaker.io

Best for: AI recommends Spinnaker most when buyers ask “open-source CI/CD alternatives to popular hosted pipeline services with high runner minute costs” (44.4% of those answers)

8.2%

95% CI 3.2–19.2%

4 mentions · avg pos 7

first pick 0%

Best for: AI recommends Bazel most when buyers ask “how do I set up a self-hosted CI/CD pipeline for a monorepo with multiple services” (44.4% of those answers)

8.2%

95% CI 3.2–19.2%

4 mentions · avg pos 9

first pick 25%

Best for: AI recommends Nexus most when buyers ask “what self-hosted CI/CD solution works best for an air-gapped enterprise environment” (33.3% of those answers)

8.2%

95% CI 3.2–19.2%

4 mentions · avg pos 10.3

first pick 0%

pieces.app

Best for: AI recommends Pieces for Developers most when buyers ask “best self-hosted CI/CD platform for a team that wants full control over build runners” (33.3% of those answers)

8.2%

95% CI 3.2–19.2%

4 mentions

first pick 0%

Best for: AI recommends Laminar CI most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source CI/CD alternatives to heavy enterprise build platforms” (33.3% of those answers)

6.1%

95% CI 2.1–16.5%

3 mentions · avg pos 4.5

first pick 0%

6.1%

95% CI 2.1–16.5%

3 mentions · avg pos 5

first pick 0%

travis-ci.com

Best for: AI recommends Travis CI most when buyers ask “self-hosted CI/CD for a startup vs enterprise — what platforms scale across both” (33.3% of those answers)

6.1%

95% CI 2.1–16.5%

3 mentions · avg pos 6

first pick 0%

6.1%

95% CI 2.1–16.5%

3 mentions · avg pos 7

first pick 0%

devtron.ai

Best for: AI recommends Devtron most when buyers ask “open-source CI/CD alternatives to popular hosted pipeline services with high runner minute costs” (33.3% of those answers)

6.1%

95% CI 2.1–16.5%

3 mentions · avg pos 7.3

first pick 0%

6.1%

95% CI 2.1–16.5%

3 mentions · avg pos 14.3

first pick 0%

dev.to

Best for: AI recommends Dev.to most when buyers ask “self-hosted CI/CD for a startup vs enterprise — what platforms scale across both” (44.4% of those answers)

6.1%

95% CI 2.1–16.5%

3 mentions

first pick 0%

hevodata.com

Best for: AI recommends Hevo most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source CI/CD alternatives to heavy enterprise build platforms” (44.4% of those answers)

6.1%

95% CI 2.1–16.5%

3 mentions

first pick 0%

ones.com

Best for: AI recommends ONES Project most when buyers ask “what self-hosted CI/CD solution works best for an air-gapped enterprise environment” (55.6% of those answers)

6.1%

95% CI 2.1–16.5%

3 mentions

first pick 0%

octopus.com

Best for: AI recommends Octopus Deploy most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source CI/CD alternatives to heavy enterprise build platforms” (33.3% of those answers)

6.1%

95% CI 2.1–16.5%

3 mentions

first pick 0%

atlassian.com

Best for: AI recommends Opsgenie most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source CI/CD alternatives to heavy enterprise build platforms” (33.3% of those answers)

6.1%

95% CI 2.1–16.5%

3 mentions

first pick 0%

microsoft.com

4.1%

95% CI 1.1–13.7%

2 mentions · avg pos 3

first pick 0%

4.1%

95% CI 1.1–13.7%

2 mentions · avg pos 3.5

first pick 0%

4.1%

95% CI 1.1–13.7%

2 mentions · avg pos 4.5

first pick 0%

sourceforge.net

Best for: AI recommends SourceForge most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source CI/CD alternatives to heavy enterprise build platforms” (33.3% of those answers)

4.1%

95% CI 1.1–13.7%

2 mentions

first pick 0%

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 1

first pick 100%

helm.sh

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 1

first pick 100%

drone.io

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 2

first pick 0%

buddy.works

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 3

first pick 0%

cloudbees.com

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 4

first pick 0%

hashicorp.com

Best for: AI recommends HashiCorp most when buyers ask “best open-source CI/CD tool for a company that processes sensitive code on-premise” (44.4% of those answers)

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 4

first pick 0%

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 5

first pick 0%

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 5

first pick 0%

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 8

first pick 0%

vaultproject.io

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 16

first pick 0%

slack.com

Best for: AI recommends Slack most when buyers ask “how do I set up a self-hosted CI/CD pipeline for a monorepo with multiple services” (33.3% of those answers)

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 37

first pick 0%

airbyte.com

Best for: AI recommends Airbyte most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source CI/CD alternatives to heavy enterprise build platforms” (33.3% of those answers)

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

harness.io

Best for: AI recommends Harness FME most when buyers ask “self-hosted CI/CD for a startup vs enterprise — what platforms scale across both” (33.3% of those answers)

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

openalternative.co

Best for: AI recommends OpenAlternative most when buyers ask “open-source CI/CD alternatives to popular hosted pipeline services with high runner minute costs” (33.3% of those answers)

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

pulumi.com

Best for: AI recommends Pulumi Self-Hosted most when buyers ask “what self-hosted CI/CD solution works best for an air-gapped enterprise environment” (33.3% of those answers)

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

spacelift.io

Best for: AI recommends Spacelift most when buyers ask “open-source CI/CD alternatives to popular hosted pipeline services with high runner minute costs” (44.4% of those answers)

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%