What AI assistants actually recommend when buyers ask about ai coding assistants — measured weekly across 5 engines, published as open data.
Updated 2026-08-02 · 72 sampled answers · rolling 4-week window · methodology
Rankings are measured from sampled AI answers — never editorial, never paid. Orbator builds AI-visibility tooling; when Orbator itself appears in any category, it is measured by the same rules as everyone else.
Sample: 72 AI answers · Window: Jul 5, 2026 – Aug 2, 2026 (4-week rolling) · trend vs prior 4 weeks (76 answers)
Across 72 sampled AI answers from 5 engines, GitHub Copilot is recommended most often — appearing in 81.9% of recommendations, followed by VS Code (79.2%) and Cursor (79.2%).
This is a measurement of share of voice across 5 AI engines — not an editorial pick. See the full ranking below.
| # | Product | Share | Trend | Engines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GitHub Copilot Best for: AI recommends GitHub Copilot most when buyers ask “best AI coding assistant for software developers” (100% of those answers) | 81.9% 95% CI 71.5–89.1% 59 mentions · avg pos 4.8 first pick 45.8% | — | GROK 62.5%GEMINI 100%CHATGPT 100%CLAUDE 75%PERPLEXITY 66.7% | Claim |
| 2 | VS Code code.visualstudio.com Best for: AI recommends VS Code most when buyers ask “best AI tool for autocomplete and code suggestions in VS Code” (100% of those answers) | 79.2% 95% CI 68.4–86.9% 57 mentions · avg pos 3.5 first pick 29.8% | — | GROK 100%GEMINI 75%CHATGPT 100%CLAUDE 62.5%PERPLEXITY 75% | Claim |
| 3 | Cursor cursor.sh Best for: AI recommends Cursor most when buyers ask “best AI coding assistant for software developers” (100% of those answers) | 79.2% 95% CI 68.4–86.9% 57 mentions · avg pos 4.9 first pick 21.1% | — | GROK 100%GEMINI 70.8%CHATGPT 100%CLAUDE 75%PERPLEXITY 75% | Claim |
| 4 | Copilot | 62.5% 95% CI 51–72.8% 45 mentions · avg pos 5.1 first pick 46.7% | — | GROK 100%GEMINI 66.7%CLAUDE 75%PERPLEXITY 62.5% | Claim |
| 5 | JetBrains Best for: AI recommends JetBrains most when buyers ask “open source alternatives to expensive AI coding assistants” (88.9% of those answers) | 54.2% 95% CI 42.7–65.2% 39 mentions · avg pos 4.6 first pick 23.1% | — | GROK 87.5%GEMINI 62.5%CHATGPT 62.5%CLAUDE 25%PERPLEXITY 41.7% | Claim |
| 6 | Tabnine tabnine.com Best for: AI recommends Tabnine most when buyers ask “lightweight alternatives to the leading AI code completion tools” (100% of those answers) | 54.2% 95% CI 42.7–65.2% 39 mentions · avg pos 7.3 first pick 0% | — | GROK 62.5%GEMINI 79.2%CHATGPT 12.5%CLAUDE 37.5%PERPLEXITY 45.8% | Claim |
| 7 | Codeium codeium.com Best for: AI recommends Codeium most when buyers ask “lightweight alternatives to the leading AI code completion tools” (100% of those answers) | 43.1% 95% CI 32.3–54.6% 31 mentions · avg pos 5.4 first pick 12.9% | — | GROK 50%GEMINI 66.7%CHATGPT 12.5%CLAUDE 37.5%PERPLEXITY 29.2% | Claim |
| 8 | Windsurf Best for: AI recommends Windsurf most when buyers ask “what AI coding tool should I use for Python development” (88.9% of those answers) | 37.5% 95% CI 27.2–49% 27 mentions · avg pos 9.5 first pick 7.4% | — | GROK 50%GEMINI 33.3%CHATGPT 62.5%CLAUDE 75%PERPLEXITY 16.7% | Claim |
| 9 | Claude Code claude.com Best for: AI recommends Claude Code most when buyers ask “best AI coding assistant for software developers” (66.7% of those answers) | 36.1% 95% CI 26–47.6% 26 mentions · avg pos 5.1 first pick 15.4% | — | GROK 62.5%GEMINI 25%CHATGPT 50%CLAUDE 50%PERPLEXITY 29.2% | Claim |
| 10 | Continue Best for: AI recommends Continue most when buyers ask “lightweight alternatives to the leading AI code completion tools” (100% of those answers) | 33.3% 95% CI 23.5–44.8% 24 mentions · avg pos 5.3 first pick 16.7% | — | GROK 37.5%GEMINI 29.2%CHATGPT 37.5%CLAUDE 37.5%PERPLEXITY 33.3% | Claim |
| 11 | Aider aider.chat Best for: AI recommends Aider most when buyers ask “open source alternatives to expensive AI coding assistants” (100% of those answers) | 26.4% 95% CI 17.6–37.6% 19 mentions · avg pos 6.1 first pick 0% | — | GROK 50%GEMINI 25%CHATGPT 12.5%CLAUDE 50%PERPLEXITY 16.7% | Claim |
| 12 | Git git-scm.com Best for: AI recommends Git most when buyers ask “open source alternatives to expensive AI coding assistants” (100% of those answers) | 22.2% 95% CI 14.2–33.1% 16 mentions · avg pos 9.1 first pick 0% | — | GROK 37.5%GEMINI 20.8%CHATGPT 12.5%CLAUDE 37.5%PERPLEXITY 16.7% | Claim |
| 13 | Cody Best for: AI recommends Cody most when buyers ask “which AI coding assistant is best for solo developers vs large teams” (55.6% of those answers) | 22.2% 95% CI 14.2–33.1% 16 mentions · avg pos 10.6 first pick 0% | — | GROK 37.5%GEMINI 41.7%PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 14 | Sourcegraph sourcegraph.com Best for: AI recommends Sourcegraph most when buyers ask “which AI coding assistant is best for solo developers vs large teams” (55.6% of those answers) | 22.2% 95% CI 14.2–33.1% 16 mentions · avg pos 11.1 first pick 0% | — | GROK 37.5%GEMINI 41.7%PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 15 | Amazon Q Developer Best for: AI recommends Amazon Q Developer most when buyers ask “what should I use to generate boilerplate code with AI” (44.4% of those answers) | 22.2% 95% CI 14.2–33.1% 16 mentions · avg pos 12.1 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 54.2%CHATGPT 12.5%CLAUDE 12.5%PERPLEXITY 4.2% | Claim |
| 16 | Cline Best for: AI recommends Cline most when buyers ask “open source alternatives to expensive AI coding assistants” (100% of those answers) | 20.8% 95% CI 13.1–31.6% 15 mentions · avg pos 5.5 first pick 6.7% | — | GROK 37.5%GEMINI 20.8%CHATGPT 25%CLAUDE 25%PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 17 | Visual Studio visualstudio.microsoft.com Best for: AI recommends Visual Studio most when buyers ask “lightweight alternatives to the leading AI code completion tools” (44.4% of those answers) | 20.8% 95% CI 13.1–31.6% 15 mentions · avg pos 6.3 first pick 20% | — | GEMINI 33.3%CHATGPT 50%PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 18 | Gemini Code Assist codeassist.google Best for: AI recommends Gemini Code Assist most when buyers ask “open source alternatives to expensive AI coding assistants” (66.7% of those answers) | 20.8% 95% CI 13.1–31.6% 15 mentions · avg pos 8.6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 45.8%CHATGPT 12.5%CLAUDE 12.5%PERPLEXITY 8.3% | Claim |
| 19 | Tabby Best for: AI recommends Tabby most when buyers ask “open source alternatives to expensive AI coding assistants” (77.8% of those answers) | 19.4% 95% CI 12–30% 14 mentions · avg pos 10.1 first pick 7.1% | — | GROK 25%GEMINI 16.7%CHATGPT 25%CLAUDE 37.5%PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 20 | PyCharm Best for: AI recommends PyCharm most when buyers ask “what AI coding tool should I use for Python development” (100% of those answers) | 16.7% 95% CI 9.8–26.9% 12 mentions · avg pos 5.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%GEMINI 20.8%CHATGPT 12.5%CLAUDE 25%PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 21 | Ollama ollama.com Best for: AI recommends Ollama most when buyers ask “open source alternatives to expensive AI coding assistants” (55.6% of those answers) | 13.9% 95% CI 7.7–23.7% 10 mentions · avg pos 6.8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 25%GEMINI 8.3%CHATGPT 37.5%CLAUDE 12.5%PERPLEXITY 8.3% | Claim |
| 22 | Augment Code augmentcode.com Best for: AI recommends Augment Code most when buyers ask “which AI coding assistant is best for solo developers vs large teams” (77.8% of those answers) | 12.5% 95% CI 6.7–22.1% 9 mentions · avg pos 4.3 first pick 11.1% | — | GROK 12.5%GEMINI 8.3%PERPLEXITY 25% | Claim |
| 23 | OpenCode Best for: AI recommends OpenCode most when buyers ask “open source alternatives to expensive AI coding assistants” (88.9% of those answers) | 12.5% 95% CI 6.7–22.1% 9 mentions · avg pos 5.7 first pick 55.6% | — | GROK 12.5%GEMINI 12.5%CLAUDE 12.5%PERPLEXITY 16.7% | Claim |
| 24 | Refact.ai refact.ai Best for: AI recommends Refact.ai most when buyers ask “lightweight alternatives to the leading AI code completion tools” (66.7% of those answers) | 12.5% 95% CI 6.7–22.1% 9 mentions · avg pos 6.7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 25%PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 25 | Continue.dev continue.dev Best for: AI recommends Continue.dev most when buyers ask “lightweight alternatives to the leading AI code completion tools” (44.4% of those answers) | 11.1% 95% CI 5.7–20.4% 8 mentions · avg pos 3.5 first pick 37.5% | — | GROK 25%GEMINI 12.5%CHATGPT 12.5%CLAUDE 25% | Claim |
| 26 | Django djangoproject.com Best for: AI recommends Django most when buyers ask “what AI coding tool should I use for Python development” (77.8% of those answers) | 11.1% 95% CI 5.7–20.4% 8 mentions · avg pos 4.3 first pick 25% | — | GROK 12.5%GEMINI 8.3%CHATGPT 25%CLAUDE 12.5%PERPLEXITY 8.3% | Claim |
| 27 | Kilo kilo.ai Best for: AI recommends Kilo most when buyers ask “open source alternatives to expensive AI coding assistants” (55.6% of those answers) | 11.1% 95% CI 5.7–20.4% 8 mentions · avg pos 7.1 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%GEMINI 12.5%PERPLEXITY 16.7% | Claim |
| 28 | JetBrains AI Best for: AI recommends JetBrains AI most when buyers ask “best AI coding assistant for software developers” (33.3% of those answers) | 11.1% 95% CI 5.7–20.4% 8 mentions · avg pos 15.7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%GEMINI 25%CLAUDE 12.5% | Claim |
| 29 | AWS aws.amazon.com Best for: AI recommends AWS most when buyers ask “what should I use to generate boilerplate code with AI” (33.3% of those answers) | 9.7% 95% CI 4.8–18.7% 7 mentions · avg pos 6.6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 25%PERPLEXITY 4.2% | Claim |
| 30 | FauxPilot Best for: AI recommends FauxPilot most when buyers ask “open source alternatives to expensive AI coding assistants” (44.4% of those answers) | 9.7% 95% CI 4.8–18.7% 7 mentions · avg pos 10.4 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%GEMINI 25% | Claim |
| 31 | IntelliJ Best for: AI recommends IntelliJ most when buyers ask “which AI coding assistant is best for solo developers vs large teams” (33.3% of those answers) | 9.7% 95% CI 4.8–18.7% 7 mentions · avg pos 10.4 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%GEMINI 16.7%CLAUDE 25% | Claim |
| 32 | IntelliCode Best for: AI recommends IntelliCode most when buyers ask “lightweight alternatives to the leading AI code completion tools” (44.4% of those answers) | 8.3% 95% CI 3.9–17% 6 mentions · avg pos 3.8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 12.5%PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 33 | Ghostwriter | 8.3% 95% CI 3.9–17% 6 mentions · avg pos 7.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 25% | Claim |
| 34 | AskCodi askcodi.com Best for: AI recommends AskCodi most when buyers ask “how do I use AI to help me debug code faster” (33.3% of those answers) | 8.3% 95% CI 3.9–17% 6 mentions · avg pos 8.2 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 25% | Claim |
| 35 | Kilo Code Best for: AI recommends Kilo Code most when buyers ask “lightweight alternatives to the leading AI code completion tools” (33.3% of those answers) | 8.3% 95% CI 3.9–17% 6 mentions · avg pos 10.8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%GEMINI 8.3%PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 36 | Qodo Best for: AI recommends Qodo most when buyers ask “best AI coding assistant for software developers” (44.4% of those answers) | 8.3% 95% CI 3.9–17% 6 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 12.5%CLAUDE 12.5%PERPLEXITY 8.3% | Claim |
| 37 | OpenHands Best for: AI recommends OpenHands most when buyers ask “open source alternatives to expensive AI coding assistants” (66.7% of those answers) | 8.3% 95% CI 3.9–17% 6 mentions · avg pos 13.8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 8.3%CHATGPT 12.5%CLAUDE 12.5%PERPLEXITY 8.3% | Claim |
| 38 | Sourcegraph Cody | 8.3% 95% CI 3.9–17% 6 mentions · avg pos 14.2 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 16.7%PERPLEXITY 8.3% | Claim |
| 39 | CodeGeeX Best for: AI recommends CodeGeeX most when buyers ask “open source alternatives to expensive AI coding assistants” (33.3% of those answers) | 6.9% 95% CI 3–15.2% 5 mentions · avg pos 6.2 first pick 20% | — | GEMINI 16.7%PERPLEXITY 4.2% | Claim |
| 40 | Goose Best for: AI recommends Goose most when buyers ask “open source alternatives to expensive AI coding assistants” (55.6% of those answers) | 6.9% 95% CI 3–15.2% 5 mentions · avg pos 6.7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 8.3%CLAUDE 12.5%PERPLEXITY 8.3% | Claim |
| 41 | LM Studio Best for: AI recommends LM Studio most when buyers ask “lightweight alternatives to the leading AI code completion tools” (33.3% of those answers) | 6.9% 95% CI 3–15.2% 5 mentions · avg pos 7.4 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%GEMINI 8.3%CHATGPT 25% | Claim |
| 42 | Pieces for Developers pieces.app Best for: AI recommends Pieces for Developers most when buyers ask “what AI coding tool should I use for Python development” (44.4% of those answers) | 6.9% 95% CI 3–15.2% 5 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 20% | — | GROK 12.5%GEMINI 4.2%PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 43 | DeepSeek deepseek.com Best for: AI recommends DeepSeek most when buyers ask “open source alternatives to expensive AI coding assistants” (44.4% of those answers) | 6.9% 95% CI 3–15.2% 5 mentions · avg pos 20.2 first pick 0% | — | GROK 25%GEMINI 8.3%CHATGPT 12.5% | Claim |
| 44 | Zapier AI zapier.com Best for: AI recommends Zapier AI most when buyers ask “lightweight alternatives to the leading AI code completion tools” (33.3% of those answers) | 5.6% 95% CI 2.2–13.4% 4 mentions · avg pos 2.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 25%PERPLEXITY 8.3% | Claim |
| 45 | Visual Studio IntelliCode Best for: AI recommends Visual Studio IntelliCode most when buyers ask “lightweight alternatives to the leading AI code completion tools” (33.3% of those answers) | 5.6% 95% CI 2.2–13.4% 4 mentions · avg pos 4.3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.2%PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 46 | Next.js nextjs.org Best for: AI recommends Next.js most when buyers ask “what should I use to generate boilerplate code with AI” (44.4% of those answers) | 5.6% 95% CI 2.2–13.4% 4 mentions · avg pos 4.3 first pick 25% | — | GROK 12.5%GEMINI 4.2%CHATGPT 12.5%CLAUDE 12.5% | Claim |
| 47 | Copilot Chat | 5.6% 95% CI 2.2–13.4% 4 mentions · avg pos 4.8 first pick 25% | — | GROK 25%GEMINI 4.2%CLAUDE 12.5% | Claim |
| 48 | Replit Ghostwriter | 5.6% 95% CI 2.2–13.4% 4 mentions · avg pos 7.8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 16.7% | Claim |
| 49 | Vim | 5.6% 95% CI 2.2–13.4% 4 mentions · avg pos 10.3 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%CHATGPT 25%CLAUDE 12.5% | Claim |
| 50 | Dev.to dev.to Best for: AI recommends Dev.to most when buyers ask “open source alternatives to expensive AI coding assistants” (33.3% of those answers) | 5.6% 95% CI 2.2–13.4% 4 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 51 | Axify axify.io Best for: AI recommends Axify most when buyers ask “lightweight alternatives to the leading AI code completion tools” (44.4% of those answers) | 5.6% 95% CI 2.2–13.4% 4 mentions · avg pos 15 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 52 | Supermaven supermaven.com Best for: AI recommends Supermaven most when buyers ask “lightweight alternatives to the leading AI code completion tools” (33.3% of those answers) | 4.2% 95% CI 1.4–11.5% 3 mentions · avg pos 2.3 first pick 33.3% | — | GEMINI 4.2%CHATGPT 12.5%PERPLEXITY 4.2% | Claim |
| 53 | Playcode AI playcode.io | 4.2% 95% CI 1.4–11.5% 3 mentions · avg pos 5.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%PERPLEXITY 8.3% | Claim |
| 54 | GPT-5 | 4.2% 95% CI 1.4–11.5% 3 mentions · avg pos 6.3 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%GEMINI 4.2%CHATGPT 12.5% | Claim |
| 55 | Replit Agent replit.com Best for: AI recommends Replit Agent most when buyers ask “which AI coding assistant is best for solo developers vs large teams” (33.3% of those answers) | 4.2% 95% CI 1.4–11.5% 3 mentions · avg pos 7.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.2%CLAUDE 12.5%PERPLEXITY 4.2% | Claim |
| 56 | Workik AI workik.com Best for: AI recommends Workik AI most when buyers ask “how do I use AI to help me debug code faster” (33.3% of those answers) | 4.2% 95% CI 1.4–11.5% 3 mentions · avg pos 8.5 first pick 33.3% | — | GEMINI 8.3%PERPLEXITY 4.2% | Claim |
| 57 | Cursor Teams Best for: AI recommends Cursor Teams most when buyers ask “which AI coding assistant is best for solo developers vs large teams” (33.3% of those answers) | 4.2% 95% CI 1.4–11.5% 3 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%CHATGPT 12.5%PERPLEXITY 4.2% | Claim |
| 58 | OpenAI Codex | 4.2% 95% CI 1.4–11.5% 3 mentions · avg pos 11.7 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 37.5% | Claim |
| 59 | DeepSeek Coder | 4.2% 95% CI 1.4–11.5% 3 mentions · avg pos 17.7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 25%GEMINI 4.2% | Claim |
| 60 | Zed | 4.2% 95% CI 1.4–11.5% 3 mentions · avg pos 31.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%CHATGPT 12.5%CLAUDE 12.5% | Claim |
| 61 | Roo | 2.8% 95% CI 0.8–9.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 8.3% | Claim |
| 62 | Roo Code | 2.8% 95% CI 0.8–9.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 8.3% | Claim |
| 63 | Built In builtin.com | 2.8% 95% CI 0.8–9.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 50% | — | CHATGPT 25% | Claim |
| 64 | Snyk snyk.io | 2.8% 95% CI 0.8–9.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 8.3% | Claim |
| 65 | Safurai safurai.com | 2.8% 95% CI 0.8–9.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 6.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 8.3% | Claim |
| 66 | Figma figma.com | 2.8% 95% CI 0.8–9.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.2%PERPLEXITY 4.2% | Claim |
| 67 | Boil | 2.8% 95% CI 0.8–9.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 8.3% | Claim |
| 68 | Vercel vercel.com | 2.8% 95% CI 0.8–9.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%CLAUDE 12.5% | Claim |
| 69 | Bolt.new bolt.new | 2.8% 95% CI 0.8–9.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%CLAUDE 12.5% | Claim |
| 70 | Qwen 2.5 Coder | 2.8% 95% CI 0.8–9.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 13 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%GEMINI 4.2% | Claim |
| 71 | daily.dev Recruiter daily.dev Best for: AI recommends daily.dev Recruiter most when buyers ask “which AI coding assistant is best for solo developers vs large teams” (33.3% of those answers) | 2.8% 95% CI 0.8–9.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 19 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 25% | Claim |
| 72 | Microsoft microsoft.com Best for: AI recommends Microsoft most when buyers ask “how do I use AI to help me debug code faster” (44.4% of those answers) | 2.8% 95% CI 0.8–9.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 27 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%PERPLEXITY 4.2% | Claim |
| 73 | Gemini CLI | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 1 first pick 100% | — | GEMINI 4.2% | Claim |
| 74 | GuruSup gurusup.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 1 first pick 100% | — | GROK 12.5% | Claim |
| 75 | Apigee cloud.google.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.2% | Claim |
| 76 | NxCode nxcode.io | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5% | Claim |
| 77 | Prismic prismic.io | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5% | Claim |
| 78 | Qodo-gen | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 4.2% | Claim |
| 79 | AI README Generator marketplace.visualstudio.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5% | Claim |
| 80 | Codacy codacy.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.2% | Claim |
| 81 | DeepCode deepcode.ai | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.2% | Claim |
| 82 | TabbyML | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.2% | Claim |
| 83 | CodeGPT | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.2% | Claim |
| 84 | Fabi.ai fabi.ai | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.2% | Claim |
| 85 | Manus manus.im | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.2% | Claim |
| 86 | Sai by Simular simular.ai | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5% | Claim |
| 87 | Tabnine Enterprise | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.2% | Claim |
| 88 | StackBlitz stackblitz.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 12.5% | Claim |
| 89 | Angular angular.io | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 10 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 12.5% | Claim |
| 90 | Rails rubyonrails.org | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 10 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 12.5% | Claim |
| 91 | Vite vitejs.dev | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 10 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 12.5% | Claim |
| 92 | DigitalOcean digitalocean.com | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5% | Claim |
| 93 | Sentry sentry.io | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.2% | Claim |
| 94 | Codium | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 15 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.2% | Claim |
| 95 | Mistral mistral.ai | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 19 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5% | Claim |
| 96 | Yeoman yeoman.io | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 19 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5% | Claim |
| 97 | plop | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 19 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5% | Claim |
| 98 | OpenAlternative openalternative.co Best for: AI recommends OpenAlternative most when buyers ask “open source alternatives to expensive AI coding assistants” (33.3% of those answers) | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 25 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5% | Claim |
| 99 | UI Bakery On-Premise uibakery.io | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 28 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 12.5% | Claim |
| 100 | Bito AI bito.ai Best for: AI recommends Bito AI most when buyers ask “what AI coding tool should I use for Python development” (44.4% of those answers) | 1.4% 95% CI 0.2–7.5% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 4.2% | Claim |
Reading the numbers: Share is a point estimate on 72 sampled answers, so each row also shows its 95% CI — the Wilson score interval around that share. When two products' intervals overlap, the gap between them isn't statistically meaningful at this sample size. First pick is the share of a product's recommending answers where it was named first, which separates “always mentioned” from “usually the top recommendation”. Full methodology.
Independence: Orbator customers are badged for disclosure. Customer status does not affect prompts, sampling, extraction, or ranking — see the methodology. Your product on this list? Claim it to see the prompts behind your rank and track it weekly.
What AI recommends in adjacent categories — same method, fresh weekly.
Not in the answer? That's fixable.
Check Your AI Visibility →© 2026 Orbator. All rights reserved.