What AI assistants actually recommend when buyers ask about ai meeting assistants — measured weekly across 5 engines, published as open data.
Updated 2026-08-07 · 59 sampled answers · rolling 4-week window · methodology
Rankings are measured from sampled AI answers — never editorial, never paid. Orbator builds AI-visibility tooling; when Orbator itself appears in any category, it is measured by the same rules as everyone else.
Sample: 59 AI answers · Window: Jul 10, 2026 – Aug 7, 2026 (4-week rolling) · trend vs prior 4 weeks (22 answers)
Across 59 sampled AI answers from 5 engines, Fathom is recommended most often — appearing in 72.9% of recommendations, followed by Otter (72.9%) and Zoom (61%).
This is a measurement of share of voice across 5 AI engines — not an editorial pick. See the full ranking below.
| # | Product | Share | Trend | Engines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fathom usefathom.com Best for: AI recommends Fathom most when buyers ask “best AI meeting assistants for transcription and note-taking” (90.9% of those answers) | 72.9% 95% CI 60.4–82.6% 43 mentions · avg pos 8.3 first pick 16.3% | — | GROK 66.7%GEMINI 81%CHATGPT 100%CLAUDE 71.4%PERPLEXITY 57.1% | Claim |
| 2 | Otter otter.ai Best for: AI recommends Otter most when buyers ask “best AI meeting assistants for transcription and note-taking” (100% of those answers) | 72.9% 95% CI 60.4–82.6% 43 mentions · avg pos 8.3 first pick 7% | — | GROK 66.7%GEMINI 71.4%CHATGPT 71.4%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 85.7% | Claim |
| 3 | Zoom zoom.com Best for: AI recommends Zoom most when buyers ask “how do I capture key decisions from team meetings without someone taking manual notes” (100% of those answers) | 61% 95% CI 48.3–72.4% 36 mentions · avg pos 7.8 first pick 22.2% | — | GROK 66.7%GEMINI 71.4%CHATGPT 71.4%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 57.1% | Claim |
| 4 | Decisions Best for: AI recommends Decisions most when buyers ask “how do I capture key decisions from team meetings without someone taking manual notes” (100% of those answers) | 49.2% 95% CI 36.8–61.6% 29 mentions · avg pos 6.9 first pick 6.9% | — | GROK 33.3%GEMINI 81%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 33.3% | Claim |
| 5 | Salesforce Best for: AI recommends Salesforce most when buyers ask “which AI meeting assistant has the best CRM integration for sales calls” (70% of those answers) | 44.1% 95% CI 32.2–56.7% 26 mentions · avg pos 5.8 first pick 26.9% | — | GEMINI 71.4%CHATGPT 71.4%CLAUDE 57.1%PERPLEXITY 9.5% | Claim |
| 6 | Fellow fellow.app Best for: AI recommends Fellow most when buyers ask “alternatives to the most popular AI meeting note-taking tools” (72.7% of those answers) | 42.4% 95% CI 30.6–55.1% 25 mentions · avg pos 6.9 first pick 20% | — | GROK 66.7%GEMINI 57.1%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 57.1%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 7 | tl;dv tldv.io Best for: AI recommends tl;dv most when buyers ask “alternatives to the most popular AI meeting note-taking tools” (72.7% of those answers) | 42.4% 95% CI 30.6–55.1% 25 mentions · avg pos 8.6 first pick 12% | — | GROK 66.7%GEMINI 42.9%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 38.1% | Claim |
| 8 | Granola granola.ai Best for: AI recommends Granola most when buyers ask “alternatives to the most popular AI meeting note-taking tools” (81.8% of those answers) | 40.7% 95% CI 29.1–53.4% 24 mentions · avg pos 7.3 first pick 20.8% | — | GROK 66.7%GEMINI 38.1%CHATGPT 57.1%CLAUDE 57.1%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 9 | Fireflies fireflies.ai | 40.7% 95% CI 29.1–53.4% 24 mentions · avg pos 9.6 first pick 4.2% | — | GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 100%CLAUDE 71.4%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 10 | Fireflies.ai Best for: AI recommends Fireflies.ai most when buyers ask “best AI meeting assistants for transcription and note-taking” (54.5% of those answers) | 37.3% 95% CI 26.1–50% 22 mentions · avg pos 5.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 66.7%GEMINI 52.4%PERPLEXITY 42.9% | Claim |
| 11 | Notion notion.so Best for: AI recommends Notion most when buyers ask “how do I capture key decisions from team meetings without someone taking manual notes” (70% of those answers) | 37.3% 95% CI 26.1–50% 22 mentions · avg pos 8.8 first pick 9.1% | — | GROK 66.7%GEMINI 42.9%CHATGPT 71.4%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 19% | Claim |
| 12 | Avoma avoma.com Best for: AI recommends Avoma most when buyers ask “which AI meeting assistant has the best CRM integration for sales calls” (90% of those answers) | 37.3% 95% CI 26.1–50% 22 mentions · avg pos 12.9 first pick 4.5% | — | GROK 33.3%GEMINI 38.1%CHATGPT 57.1%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 33.3% | Claim |
| 13 | Jamie meetjamie.ai Best for: AI recommends Jamie most when buyers ask “alternatives to the most popular AI meeting note-taking tools” (63.6% of those answers) | 35.6% 95% CI 24.6–48.3% 21 mentions · avg pos 6.6 first pick 9.5% | — | GROK 66.7%GEMINI 33.3%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 42.9% | Claim |
| 14 | Slack slack.com Best for: AI recommends Slack most when buyers ask “what should I use to automatically take notes and action items from my meetings” (70% of those answers) | 33.9% 95% CI 23.1–46.6% 20 mentions · avg pos 7.6 first pick 5% | — | GROK 66.7%GEMINI 42.9%CHATGPT 71.4%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 9.5% | Claim |
| 15 | Krisp krisp.ai Best for: AI recommends Krisp most when buyers ask “alternatives to the most popular AI meeting note-taking tools” (81.8% of those answers) | 33.9% 95% CI 23.1–46.6% 20 mentions · avg pos 10.4 first pick 5% | — | GROK 33.3%GEMINI 38.1%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 33.3% | Claim |
| 16 | HubSpot CRM hubspot.com Best for: AI recommends HubSpot CRM most when buyers ask “which AI meeting assistant has the best CRM integration for sales calls” (100% of those answers) | 32.2% 95% CI 21.7–44.9% 19 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 33.3%GEMINI 52.4%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 19% | Claim |
| 17 | Zapier AI zapier.com Best for: AI recommends Zapier AI most when buyers ask “which AI meeting assistant has the best CRM integration for sales calls” (60% of those answers) | 30.5% 95% CI 20.3–43.1% 18 mentions · avg pos 10.8 first pick 5.6% | — | GROK 66.7%GEMINI 14.3%PERPLEXITY 61.9% | Claim |
| 18 | Tactiq tactiq.io Best for: AI recommends Tactiq most when buyers ask “alternatives to the most popular AI meeting note-taking tools” (63.6% of those answers) | 27.1% 95% CI 17.4–39.6% 16 mentions · avg pos 9.1 first pick 6.3% | — | GEMINI 38.1%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 33.3% | Claim |
| 19 | Read AI read.ai Best for: AI recommends Read AI most when buyers ask “AI meeting assistants for sales teams vs AI meeting tools for general business use” (40% of those answers) | 27.1% 95% CI 17.4–39.6% 16 mentions · avg pos 13.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 33.3%GEMINI 38.1%CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 20 | Lindy.ai lindy.ai Best for: AI recommends Lindy.ai most when buyers ask “what should I use to automatically take notes and action items from my meetings” (50% of those answers) | 25.4% 95% CI 16.1–37.8% 15 mentions · avg pos 6.7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 28.6%PERPLEXITY 42.9% | Claim |
| 21 | Google Meet meet.google.com Best for: AI recommends Google Meet most when buyers ask “how do I capture key decisions from team meetings without someone taking manual notes” (60% of those answers) | 25.4% 95% CI 16.1–37.8% 15 mentions · avg pos 14.2 first pick 13.3% | — | GROK 66.7%CHATGPT 71.4%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 33.3% | Claim |
| 22 | Sembly sembly.ai Best for: AI recommends Sembly most when buyers ask “alternatives to the most popular AI meeting note-taking tools” (54.5% of those answers) | 23.7% 95% CI 14.7–36% 14 mentions · avg pos 10.8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 33.3%GEMINI 38.1%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 19% | Claim |
| 23 | MeetGeek meetgeek.ai Best for: AI recommends MeetGeek most when buyers ask “alternatives to the most popular AI meeting note-taking tools” (54.5% of those answers) | 23.7% 95% CI 14.7–36% 14 mentions · avg pos 12.7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 33.3%GEMINI 33.3%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 19% | Claim |
| 24 | Gong gong.io Best for: AI recommends Gong most when buyers ask “which AI meeting assistant has the best CRM integration for sales calls” (80% of those answers) | 22% 95% CI 13.4–34.1% 13 mentions · avg pos 5.2 first pick 30.8% | — | GEMINI 23.8%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 19% | Claim |
| 25 | Asana asana.com Best for: AI recommends Asana most when buyers ask “what should I use to automatically take notes and action items from my meetings” (70% of those answers) | 22% 95% CI 13.4–34.1% 13 mentions · avg pos 9.2 first pick 7.7% | — | GEMINI 38.1%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 28.6% | Claim |
| 26 | Notta Best for: AI recommends Notta most when buyers ask “alternatives to the most popular AI meeting note-taking tools” (45.5% of those answers) | 20.3% 95% CI 12–32.3% 12 mentions · avg pos 9.2 first pick 0% | — | GROK 33.3%GEMINI 33.3%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 9.5% | Claim |
| 27 | Jira Best for: AI recommends Jira most when buyers ask “what should I use to automatically take notes and action items from my meetings” (50% of those answers) | 18.6% 95% CI 10.7–30.4% 11 mentions · avg pos 8.2 first pick 9.1% | — | GEMINI 33.3%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 28 | Blue Dot Best for: AI recommends Blue Dot most when buyers ask “alternatives to the most popular AI meeting note-taking tools” (45.5% of those answers) | 15.3% 95% CI 8.2–26.5% 9 mentions · avg pos 6.3 first pick 11.1% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 29 | Mixmax mixmax.com Best for: AI recommends Mixmax most when buyers ask “best tools for automatically summarizing meeting recordings” (54.5% of those answers) | 15.3% 95% CI 8.2–26.5% 9 mentions · avg pos 6.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 33.3%GEMINI 9.5%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 30 | Sembly AI Best for: AI recommends Sembly AI most when buyers ask “alternatives to the most popular AI meeting note-taking tools” (36.4% of those answers) | 15.3% 95% CI 8.2–26.5% 9 mentions · avg pos 11.9 first pick 0% | — | GROK 33.3%GEMINI 23.8%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 9.5% | Claim |
| 31 | Notion AI notion.com Best for: AI recommends Notion AI most when buyers ask “alternatives to the most popular AI meeting note-taking tools” (36.4% of those answers) | 13.6% 95% CI 7–24.5% 8 mentions · avg pos 14.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 33.3%GEMINI 14.3%PERPLEXITY 19% | Claim |
| 32 | ClickUp clickup.com Best for: AI recommends ClickUp most when buyers ask “alternatives to the most popular AI meeting note-taking tools” (36.4% of those answers) | 11.9% 95% CI 5.9–22.5% 7 mentions · avg pos 14.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 19%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 9.5% | Claim |
| 33 | Pipedrive pipedrive.com Best for: AI recommends Pipedrive most when buyers ask “which AI meeting assistant has the best CRM integration for sales calls” (90% of those answers) | 10.2% 95% CI 4.7–20.5% 6 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 9.5%CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 34 | Agentforce salesforce.com Best for: AI recommends Agentforce most when buyers ask “which AI meeting assistant has the best CRM integration for sales calls” (40% of those answers) | 8.5% 95% CI 3.7–18.4% 5 mentions · avg pos 1 first pick 40% | — | GEMINI 4.8%PERPLEXITY 19% | Claim |
| 35 | Coffee coffee.ai Best for: AI recommends Coffee most when buyers ask “which AI meeting assistant has the best CRM integration for sales calls” (50% of those answers) | 8.5% 95% CI 3.7–18.4% 5 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 36 | Sai by Simular simular.ai Best for: AI recommends Sai by Simular most when buyers ask “alternatives to the most popular AI meeting note-taking tools” (36.4% of those answers) | 8.5% 95% CI 3.7–18.4% 5 mentions · avg pos 9.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 33.3%GEMINI 4.8%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 37 | Cirrus Insight cirrusinsight.com Best for: AI recommends Cirrus Insight most when buyers ask “best tools for automatically summarizing meeting recordings” (54.5% of those answers) | 8.5% 95% CI 3.7–18.4% 5 mentions · avg pos 10 first pick 0% | — | GROK 33.3%GEMINI 4.8%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 38 | Supernormal supernormal.com | 8.5% 95% CI 3.7–18.4% 5 mentions · avg pos 10.3 first pick 0% | — | GROK 33.3%GEMINI 9.5%PERPLEXITY 9.5% | Claim |
| 39 | Linear linear.app Best for: AI recommends Linear most when buyers ask “what should I use to automatically take notes and action items from my meetings” (30% of those answers) | 8.5% 95% CI 3.7–18.4% 5 mentions · avg pos 13.6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 40 | Fellow.ai fellow.ai Best for: AI recommends Fellow.ai most when buyers ask “how do I capture key decisions from team meetings without someone taking manual notes” (30% of those answers) | 6.8% 95% CI 2.7–16.2% 4 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 41 | TicNote Cloud | 6.8% 95% CI 2.7–16.2% 4 mentions · avg pos 6.3 first pick 25% | — | GEMINI 19% | Claim |
| 42 | Loom loom.com Best for: AI recommends Loom most when buyers ask “what should I use to automatically take notes and action items from my meetings” (30% of those answers) | 6.8% 95% CI 2.7–16.2% 4 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 43 | Zoho zoho.com Best for: AI recommends Zoho most when buyers ask “which AI meeting assistant has the best CRM integration for sales calls” (50% of those answers) | 6.8% 95% CI 2.7–16.2% 4 mentions · avg pos 7.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8%CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 9.5% | Claim |
| 44 | Copper copper.com Best for: AI recommends Copper most when buyers ask “which AI meeting assistant has the best CRM integration for sales calls” (60% of those answers) | 6.8% 95% CI 2.7–16.2% 4 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 45 | Spinach spinach.ai Best for: AI recommends Spinach most when buyers ask “which AI meeting assistant has the best CRM integration for sales calls” (30% of those answers) | 6.8% 95% CI 2.7–16.2% 4 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 25% | — | GEMINI 19% | Claim |
| 46 | Grain grain.com | 6.8% 95% CI 2.7–16.2% 4 mentions · avg pos 10.3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 9.5%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 47 | Summary AI | 6.8% 95% CI 2.7–16.2% 4 mentions · avg pos 11.8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 19% | Claim |
| 48 | Sonix sonix.ai Best for: AI recommends Sonix most when buyers ask “alternatives to the most popular AI meeting note-taking tools” (36.4% of those answers) | 6.8% 95% CI 2.7–16.2% 4 mentions · avg pos 14.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 49 | Chorus chorus.ai Best for: AI recommends Chorus most when buyers ask “AI meeting assistants for sales teams vs AI meeting tools for general business use” (30% of those answers) | 5.1% 95% CI 1.7–13.9% 3 mentions · avg pos 1.7 first pick 66.7% | — | GEMINI 9.5%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 50 | Microsoft microsoft.com | 5.1% 95% CI 1.7–13.9% 3 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 33.3% | — | GROK 33.3%GEMINI 4.8%CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 51 | Close close.com Best for: AI recommends Close most when buyers ask “which AI meeting assistant has the best CRM integration for sales calls” (30% of those answers) | 5.1% 95% CI 1.7–13.9% 3 mentions · avg pos 5.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 9.5%PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 52 | Notta Scheduler notta.ai | 5.1% 95% CI 1.7–13.9% 3 mentions · avg pos 6.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8%PERPLEXITY 9.5% | Claim |
| 53 | Fathom Video fathom.video | 5.1% 95% CI 1.7–13.9% 3 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | GROK 33.3%GEMINI 9.5% | Claim |
| 54 | Nimitai nimitai.com | 5.1% 95% CI 1.7–13.9% 3 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8%PERPLEXITY 9.5% | Claim |
| 55 | VoiceToNotes.ai voicetonotes.ai Best for: AI recommends VoiceToNotes.ai most when buyers ask “alternatives to the most popular AI meeting note-taking tools” (36.4% of those answers) | 5.1% 95% CI 1.7–13.9% 3 mentions · avg pos 14.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 9.5%PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 56 | Laxis laxis.com | 5.1% 95% CI 1.7–13.9% 3 mentions · avg pos 27 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 57 | Monday monday.com Best for: AI recommends Monday most when buyers ask “which AI meeting assistant has the best CRM integration for sales calls” (50% of those answers) | 5.1% 95% CI 1.7–13.9% 3 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 58 | Opsgenie atlassian.com Best for: AI recommends Opsgenie most when buyers ask “what should I use to automatically take notes and action items from my meetings” (30% of those answers) | 5.1% 95% CI 1.7–13.9% 3 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 59 | ZoomInfo pipeline.zoominfo.com Best for: AI recommends ZoomInfo most when buyers ask “AI meeting assistants for sales teams vs AI meeting tools for general business use” (30% of those answers) | 3.4% 95% CI 0.9–11.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 50% | — | GEMINI 4.8%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 60 | Meetily | 3.4% 95% CI 0.9–11.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 2.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 9.5% | Claim |
| 61 | Sai | 3.4% 95% CI 0.9–11.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8%PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 62 | Sybill sybill.ai Best for: AI recommends Sybill most when buyers ask “which AI meeting assistant has the best CRM integration for sales calls” (30% of those answers) | 3.4% 95% CI 0.9–11.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 9.5% | Claim |
| 63 | AssemblyAI assemblyai.com | 3.4% 95% CI 0.9–11.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | GROK 33.3%PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 64 | Bluedot AI Note Taker | 3.4% 95% CI 0.9–11.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 10 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8%PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 65 | Rewatch rewatch.com | 3.4% 95% CI 0.9–11.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 28.6% | Claim |
| 66 | Superpowered | 3.4% 95% CI 0.9–11.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 14 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 9.5% | Claim |
| 67 | Meeting.ai meeting.ai | 3.4% 95% CI 0.9–11.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 16 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8%PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 68 | Notebook LM notebooklm.google.com | 3.4% 95% CI 0.9–11.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 18 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8%PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 69 | Happy Scribe happyscribe.com | 3.4% 95% CI 0.9–11.5% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 9.5% | Claim |
| 70 | Reclaim.ai reclaim.ai | 3.4% 95% CI 0.9–11.5% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 9.5% | Claim |
| 71 | Chorus by ZoomInfo zoominfo.com | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions · avg pos 1 first pick 100% | — | GEMINI 4.8% | Claim |
| 72 | Taskade taskade.com | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 73 | VexaScribe | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8% | Claim |
| 74 | HiNoter | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8% | Claim |
| 75 | Whisper AI | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8% | Claim |
| 76 | Spinach AI spinach.io | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8% | Claim |
| 77 | Motion usemotion.com | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8% | Claim |
| 78 | Nooks nooks.ai | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 79 | Outreach.io outreach.io | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8% | Claim |
| 80 | Trint trint.com | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 81 | Trello trello.com | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8% | Claim |
| 82 | MaxIQ getmaxiq.com | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions · avg pos 13 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8% | Claim |
| 83 | SpeakNotes | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions · avg pos 13 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8% | Claim |
| 84 | Miro miro.com | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions · avg pos 17 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8% | Claim |
| 85 | Zoom for Healthcare zoom.us | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions · avg pos 24 first pick 0% | — | GROK 33.3% | Claim |
| 86 | Temi temi.com | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions · avg pos 27 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8% | Claim |
| 87 | Obsidian obsidian.md | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions · avg pos 34 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 4.8% | Claim |
| 88 | Clari clari.com | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 89 | F6S f6s.com | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 90 | GoConsensus goconsensus.com | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 91 | GuideFlow guideflow.com | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 92 | NotePT.io notegpt.io | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 93 | NovaScribe novascribe.ai | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 94 | PCMag pcmag.com | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 95 | Plaud NotePin plaud.ai | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 96 | Rev rev.com | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
| 97 | TechTarget techtarget.com | 1.7% 95% CI 0.3–9% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 4.8% | Claim |
Reading the numbers: Share is a point estimate on 59 sampled answers, so each row also shows its 95% CI — the Wilson score interval around that share. When two products' intervals overlap, the gap between them isn't statistically meaningful at this sample size. First pick is the share of a product's recommending answers where it was named first, which separates “always mentioned” from “usually the top recommendation”. Full methodology.
Independence: Orbator customers are badged for disclosure. Customer status does not affect prompts, sampling, extraction, or ranking — see the methodology. Your product on this list? Claim it to see the prompts behind your rank and track it weekly.
What AI recommends in adjacent categories — same method, fresh weekly.
Not in the answer? That's fixable.
Check Your AI Visibility →© 2026 Orbator. All rights reserved.