What AI assistants actually recommend when buyers ask about project management for software engineering teams — measured on a rolling 4-week window across 5 engines, published as open data.
Updated 2026-09-28 · 40 sampled answers · rolling 4-week window · methodology
Rankings are measured from sampled AI answers — never editorial, never paid. Orbator builds AI-visibility tooling; when Orbator itself appears in any category, it is measured by the same rules as everyone else.
Measured by Orbatormethodology owner Henrik Tellewindow ends Sep 28, 2026
Sample: 40 AI answers · Window: Aug 31, 2026 – Sep 28, 2026 (4-week rolling) · trend vs prior 4 weeks (31 answers)
Samples by engine: GROK 8 (last run Sep 2, 2026) · GEMINI 8 (last run Sep 1, 2026) · CHATGPT 8 (last run Sep 1, 2026) · CLAUDE 8 (last run Sep 2, 2026) · PERPLEXITY 8 (last run Sep 1, 2026 — stalest)
How these numbers are made: sampling design · prompt provenance · what counts as a mention · what we cannot see
On the record: This ranking is frozen as a dated snapshot every day. View this category's history to see what entered and left the ranking and when, or read what the engines actually said on a given day.
Across 40 sampled AI answers from 5 engines, Jira is recommended most often — appearing in 77.5% of recommendations, followed by Linear (75%) and ClickUp (47.5%).
This is a measurement of share of voice across 5 AI engines — not an editorial pick. See the full ranking below.
Orbator asked Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity buyer questions about project management for software engineering teams and sampled 40 answers between Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 28, 2026. Recommendation share counts the answers that recommended or listed a product, so a passing mention or a warning adds nothing to it. A category publishes once it holds at least 20 independently sampled answers in the window. Read the full methodology or download this ranking as CSV.
| # | Product | Share | Trend | Engines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jira | 77.5% 95% CI 62.5–87.7% 31 mentions · avg pos 4.1 first pick 35.5% | — | GROK 75%GEMINI 87.5%CHATGPT 87.5%CLAUDE 62.5%PERPLEXITY 75% | Claim |
| 2 | linear.app | 75% 95% CI 59.8–85.8% 30 mentions · avg pos 3.5 first pick 40% | — | GROK 100%GEMINI 50%CHATGPT 87.5%CLAUDE 75%PERPLEXITY 62.5% | Claim |
| 3 | clickup.com | 47.5% 95% CI 32.9–62.5% 19 mentions · avg pos 4.8 first pick 15.8% | — | GROK 62.5%GEMINI 50%CHATGPT 37.5%CLAUDE 50%PERPLEXITY 37.5% | Claim |
| 4 | backlog.com | 40% 95% CI 26.3–55.4% 16 mentions · avg pos 2.5 first pick 31.3% | — | GROK 37.5%GEMINI 75%CHATGPT 12.5%CLAUDE 25%PERPLEXITY 50% | Claim |
| 5 | gitlab.com | 40% 95% CI 26.3–55.4% 16 mentions · avg pos 3.5 first pick 37.5% | — | GROK 75%GEMINI 37.5%CHATGPT 37.5%CLAUDE 25%PERPLEXITY 25% | Claim |
| 6 | monday.com | 35% 95% CI 22.1–50.5% 14 mentions · avg pos 9.8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 62.5%GEMINI 50%CHATGPT 37.5%PERPLEXITY 25% | Claim |
| 7 | trello.com | 32.5% 95% CI 20.1–48% 13 mentions · avg pos 5.7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 25%GEMINI 50%CHATGPT 12.5%CLAUDE 37.5%PERPLEXITY 37.5% | Claim |
| 8 | asana.com | 32.5% 95% CI 20.1–48% 13 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 37.5%GEMINI 62.5%CHATGPT 25%CLAUDE 12.5%PERPLEXITY 25% | Claim |
| 9 | shortcut.com | 30% 95% CI 18.1–45.4% 12 mentions · avg pos 8.8 first pick 8.3% | — | GROK 50%GEMINI 37.5%CHATGPT 37.5%PERPLEXITY 25% | Claim |
| 10 | plane.so | 27.5% 95% CI 16.1–42.8% 11 mentions · avg pos 5.7 first pick 9.1% | — | GROK 62.5%GEMINI 12.5%CHATGPT 25%CLAUDE 12.5%PERPLEXITY 25% | Claim |
| 11 | azure.microsoft.com | 25% 95% CI 14.2–40.2% 10 mentions · avg pos 6.3 first pick 0% | — | GROK 25%GEMINI 50%CHATGPT 12.5%PERPLEXITY 37.5% | Claim |
| 12 | slack.com | 25% 95% CI 14.2–40.2% 10 mentions · avg pos 8.2 first pick 0% | — | GROK 50%GEMINI 37.5%CHATGPT 12.5%CLAUDE 25% | Claim |
| 13 | microsoft.com | 20% 95% CI 10.5–34.8% 8 mentions · avg pos 9.3 first pick 0% | — | GROK 37.5%GEMINI 25%CHATGPT 12.5%PERPLEXITY 25% | Claim |
| 14 | YouTrack | 17.5% 95% CI 8.7–32% 7 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 14.3% | — | GROK 12.5%CHATGPT 50%PERPLEXITY 25% | Claim |
| 15 | notion.so | 17.5% 95% CI 8.7–32% 7 mentions · avg pos 5.4 first pick 0% | — | GROK 25%CHATGPT 37.5%CLAUDE 12.5%PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 16 | atlassian.com | 12.5% 95% CI 5.5–26.1% 5 mentions · avg pos 2.6 first pick 40% | — | GROK 12.5%CHATGPT 50% | Claim |
| 17 | MantisBT | 12.5% 95% CI 5.5–26.1% 5 mentions · avg pos 5.8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%GEMINI 12.5%CHATGPT 12.5%CLAUDE 12.5%PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 18 | zenhub.com | 12.5% 95% CI 5.5–26.1% 5 mentions · avg pos 22 first pick 0% | — | GROK 37.5%GEMINI 12.5%CLAUDE 12.5% | Claim |
| 19 | jetbrains.com | 10% 95% CI 4–23.1% 4 mentions · avg pos 3.8 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 50% | Claim |
| 20 | zoho.com | 10% 95% CI 4–23.1% 4 mentions · avg pos 4.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 25%CLAUDE 25% | Claim |
| 21 | Zoho Sprints | 10% 95% CI 4–23.1% 4 mentions · avg pos 4.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 25%CLAUDE 25% | Claim |
| 22 | trac.edgewall.org | 10% 95% CI 4–23.1% 4 mentions · avg pos 6.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%GEMINI 12.5%CLAUDE 12.5%PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 23 | ones.com | 7.5% 95% CI 2.6–19.9% 3 mentions · avg pos 5.7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%GEMINI 25% | Claim |
| 24 | redmine.org | 7.5% 95% CI 2.6–19.9% 3 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%GEMINI 25% | Claim |
| 25 | Azure DevOps Boards | 5% 95% CI 1.4–16.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 12.5%PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 26 | Bugzilla | 5% 95% CI 1.4–16.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 5.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%CHATGPT 12.5% | Claim |
| 27 | vikunja.io | 5% 95% CI 1.4–16.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 12.5%CLAUDE 12.5% | Claim |
| 28 | wrike.com | 5% 95% CI 1.4–16.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 25% | Claim |
| 29 | codepulsehq.com | 5% 95% CI 1.4–16.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 6.5 first pick 50% | — | GROK 25% | Claim |
| 30 | basecamp.com | 5% 95% CI 1.4–16.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 7.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 12.5%PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 31 | augmentcode.com | 5% 95% CI 1.4–16.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 15.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 25% | Claim |
| 32 | taiga.io | 5% 95% CI 1.4–16.5% 2 mentions · avg pos 25 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5%GEMINI 12.5% | Claim |
| 33 | agiled.app | 5% 95% CI 1.4–16.5% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | GROK 25% | Claim |
| 34 | dev.azure.com | 2.5% 95% CI 0.4–12.9% 1 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 12.5% | Claim |
| 35 | smartsheet.com | 2.5% 95% CI 0.4–12.9% 1 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 12.5% | Claim |
| 36 | todoist.com | 2.5% 95% CI 0.4–12.9% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 37 | zendesk.com | 2.5% 95% CI 0.4–12.9% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 12.5% | Claim |
| 38 | doboard.com | 2.5% 95% CI 0.4–12.9% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5% | Claim |
| 39 | openalternative.co | 2.5% 95% CI 0.4–12.9% 1 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5% | Claim |
| 40 | glitchtip.com | 2.5% 95% CI 0.4–12.9% 1 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 12.5% | Claim |
| 41 | dev.to | 2.5% 95% CI 0.4–12.9% 1 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5% | Claim |
| 42 | VersionOne | 2.5% 95% CI 0.4–12.9% 1 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 12.5% | Claim |
| 43 | Zoho Projects | 2.5% 95% CI 0.4–12.9% 1 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 12.5% | Claim |
| 44 | usemotion.com | 2.5% 95% CI 0.4–12.9% 1 mentions · avg pos 10 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 12.5% | Claim |
| 45 | ntask.com | 2.5% 95% CI 0.4–12.9% 1 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 12.5% | Claim |
| 46 | nuclino.com | 2.5% 95% CI 0.4–12.9% 1 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 12.5% | Claim |
| 47 | adminlte.io | 2.5% 95% CI 0.4–12.9% 1 mentions · avg pos 41 first pick 0% | — | GROK 12.5% | Claim |
Reading the numbers: Share is a point estimate on 40 sampled answers, so each row also shows its 95% CI — the Wilson score interval around that share. When two products' intervals overlap, the gap between them isn't statistically meaningful at this sample size. First pick is the share of a product's recommending answers where it was named first, which separates “always mentioned” from “usually the top recommendation”. Full methodology.
Independence: Orbator customers are badged for disclosure. Customer status does not affect prompts, sampling, extraction, or ranking — see the methodology. Your product on this list? Claim it to see the prompts behind your rank and track it weekly.
Watch this category
These rankings move. Get one email a week on who AI recommends in Project management for software engineering teams. No account needed.
Head-to-head pages for products ranked in Project management for software engineering teams. Each one sets out sourced facts side by side, plus which product AI assistants recommend more, engine by engine.
Every number on this page is measured from sampled answers, and those answers are kept. The archive holds dated excerpts of what each engine answered, never full answers. Read the answer archive for project management for software engineering teams to see the excerpts by date and engine, or view the ranking history to see what entered and left this ranking and when.
Across 40 sampled AI answers from 5 engines (Aug 31, 2026 to Sep 28, 2026), Jira is recommended most often for project management for software engineering teams, appearing in 77.5% of recommendations, followed by Linear (75%). This is a measurement of what AI assistants recommend, not an editorial verdict.
ChatGPT recommends Jira most often for project management for software engineering teams. It appears as a recommendation in 87.5% of ChatGPT's sampled answers in this window (Aug 31, 2026 to Sep 28, 2026). Other engines answer differently. The per-engine breakdown in the ranking shows each one.
Orbator samples AI answers to buyer questions across 5 engines and counts how often each product is recommended. No product pays for placement. The project management for software engineering teams ranking is based on 40 answers in the current 4-week window (Aug 31, 2026 to Sep 28, 2026). Full methodology is published at https://www.orbator.io/ai-index/methodology.
Verified facts for the most-recommended products — each sourced and dated. No editorial scoring, just the data side by side.
| Trellotrello.com | Planeplane.so | Microsoftmicrosoft.com | Redmineredmine.org | Vikunjavikunja.io | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Standard: $5 a month (free tier available) ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | — | — | — | Self-Hosted: Free ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 |
| Features | Custom Fields ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | Project management ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | cloud storage ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | Time tracking ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | Time tracking ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 |
| Platforms | Web ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | Windows ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | XBOX console ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | Web ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | Docker ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 |
| Integrations | Salesforce ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | Jira ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | — | LDAP ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | CalDAV ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 |
What AI recommends in adjacent categories — same method, fresh weekly.
Not in the answer? That's fixable.
Check Your AI Visibility →© 2026 Orbator. All rights reserved.