Best Self-hosted monitoring and observability platforms

prometheus.io

95.9%

95% CI 86.3–98.9%

47 mentions · avg pos 3.6

first pick 38.3%

opentelemetry.io

Best for: AI recommends OpenTelemetry most when buyers ask “best self-hosted observability stack for a DevOps team monitoring microservices” (100% of those answers)

77.6%

95% CI 64.1–87%

38 mentions · avg pos 4.7

first pick 21.1%

openobserve.ai

Best for: AI recommends OpenObserve most when buyers ask “best self-hosted observability stack for a DevOps team monitoring microservices” (88.9% of those answers)

77.6%

95% CI 64.1–87%

38 mentions · avg pos 5.1

first pick 21.1%

Best for: AI recommends Loki most when buyers ask “best self-hosted observability stack for a DevOps team monitoring microservices” (88.9% of those answers)

75.5%

95% CI 61.9–85.4%

37 mentions · avg pos 4.1

first pick 24.3%

Best for: AI recommends Tempo most when buyers ask “best self-hosted observability stack for a DevOps team monitoring microservices” (88.9% of those answers)

67.3%

95% CI 53.4–78.8%

33 mentions · avg pos 5.3

first pick 18.2%

signoz.io

Best for: AI recommends SigNoz most when buyers ask “best self-hosted observability stack for a DevOps team monitoring microservices” (88.9% of those answers)

67.3%

95% CI 53.4–78.8%

33 mentions · avg pos 6.2

first pick 21.2%

jaegertracing.io

Best for: AI recommends Jaeger most when buyers ask “what open-source tool should I use to replace a costly hosted APM platform for a Kubernetes cluster” (100% of those answers)

49%

95% CI 35.6–62.5%

24 mentions · avg pos 8.6

first pick 4.2%

elastic.co

Best for: AI recommends Elasticsearch most when buyers ask “what open-source tool should I use to replace a costly hosted APM platform for a Kubernetes cluster” (88.9% of those answers)

44.9%

95% CI 31.9–58.7%

22 mentions · avg pos 8.9

first pick 13.6%

Best for: AI recommends Mimir most when buyers ask “best self-hosted observability stack for a DevOps team monitoring microservices” (55.6% of those answers)

38.8%

95% CI 26.4–52.8%

19 mentions · avg pos 5.8

first pick 21.1%

clickhouse.com

Best for: AI recommends ClickHouse most when buyers ask “how do I set up a self-hosted monitoring system with metrics, logs, and traces in one place” (88.9% of those answers)

38.8%

95% CI 26.4–52.8%

19 mentions · avg pos 8.9

first pick 10.5%

grafana.com

36.7%

95% CI 24.7–50.7%

18 mentions · avg pos 3.4

first pick 27.8%

Best for: AI recommends Kibana most when buyers ask “open-source observability alternatives to expensive cloud monitoring services” (55.6% of those answers)

34.7%

95% CI 22.9–48.7%

17 mentions · avg pos 10.6

first pick 0%

Best for: AI recommends Grafana Loki most when buyers ask “best self-hosted observability stack for a DevOps team monitoring microservices” (55.6% of those answers)

32.7%

95% CI 21.2–46.6%

16 mentions · avg pos 4.4

first pick 12.5%

Best for: AI recommends ELK most when buyers ask “open-source observability alternatives to expensive cloud monitoring services” (77.8% of those answers)

32.7%

95% CI 21.2–46.6%

16 mentions · avg pos 9.4

first pick 6.3%

helm.sh

Best for: AI recommends Helm most when buyers ask “how do I set up a self-hosted monitoring system with metrics, logs, and traces in one place” (88.9% of those answers)

28.6%

95% CI 17.8–42.4%

14 mentions · avg pos 6.9

first pick 21.4%

netdata.cloud

Best for: AI recommends Netdata most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source monitoring alternatives to large paid observability platforms” (100% of those answers)

28.6%

95% CI 17.8–42.4%

14 mentions · avg pos 7

first pick 21.4%

datadoghq.com

Best for: AI recommends Datadog most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source monitoring alternatives to large paid observability platforms” (88.9% of those answers)

26.5%

95% CI 16.2–40.3%

13 mentions · avg pos 4.6

first pick 7.7%

Best for: AI recommends Zipkin most when buyers ask “open-source observability alternatives to expensive cloud monitoring services” (66.7% of those answers)

26.5%

95% CI 16.2–40.3%

13 mentions · avg pos 10.9

first pick 0%

kubernetes.io

24.5%

95% CI 14.6–38.1%

12 mentions · avg pos 5.8

first pick 8.3%

Best for: AI recommends OpenTelemetry Collector most when buyers ask “how do I set up a self-hosted monitoring system with metrics, logs, and traces in one place” (66.7% of those answers)

24.5%

95% CI 14.6–38.1%

12 mentions · avg pos 10.4

first pick 16.7%

Best for: AI recommends ELK Stack most when buyers ask “open-source observability alternatives to expensive cloud monitoring services” (55.6% of those answers)

24.5%

95% CI 14.6–38.1%

12 mentions · avg pos 12

first pick 8.3%

newrelic.com

Best for: AI recommends New Relic most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source monitoring alternatives to large paid observability platforms” (77.8% of those answers)

20.4%

95% CI 11.5–33.6%

10 mentions · avg pos 4.4

first pick 10%

zabbix.com

Best for: AI recommends Zabbix most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source monitoring alternatives to large paid observability platforms” (88.9% of those answers)

20.4%

95% CI 11.5–33.6%

10 mentions · avg pos 7.1

first pick 0%

Best for: AI recommends Coroot most when buyers ask “what open-source tool should I use to replace a costly hosted APM platform for a Kubernetes cluster” (55.6% of those answers)

20.4%

95% CI 11.5–33.6%

10 mentions · avg pos 10.1

first pick 0%

opensearch.org

Best for: AI recommends OpenSearch most when buyers ask “open-source observability alternatives to expensive cloud monitoring services” (55.6% of those answers)

20.4%

95% CI 11.5–33.6%

10 mentions · avg pos 11.1

first pick 0%

skywalking.apache.org

Best for: AI recommends Apache SkyWalking most when buyers ask “best open-source monitoring platform for tracking application performance and infrastructure metrics” (33.3% of those answers)

18.4%

95% CI 10–31.4%

9 mentions · avg pos 9.6

first pick 0%

docker.com

Best for: AI recommends Docker most when buyers ask “how do I set up a self-hosted monitoring system with metrics, logs, and traces in one place” (66.7% of those answers)

14.3%

95% CI 7.1–26.7%

7 mentions · avg pos 4.6

first pick 28.6%

victoriametrics.com

Best for: AI recommends VictoriaMetrics most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source monitoring alternatives to large paid observability platforms” (44.4% of those answers)

14.3%

95% CI 7.1–26.7%

7 mentions · avg pos 6.9

first pick 0%

Best for: AI recommends Grafana Labs most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source monitoring alternatives to large paid observability platforms” (44.4% of those answers)

14.3%

95% CI 7.1–26.7%

7 mentions · avg pos 7

first pick 14.3%

Best for: AI recommends Alertmanager most when buyers ask “best open-source monitoring platform for tracking application performance and infrastructure metrics” (33.3% of those answers)

14.3%

95% CI 7.1–26.7%

7 mentions · avg pos 7.3

first pick 14.3%

14.3%

95% CI 7.1–26.7%

7 mentions · avg pos 11.7

first pick 0%

parseable.com

Best for: AI recommends Parseable most when buyers ask “self-hosted observability platform for a fintech company with strict data residency requirements” (66.7% of those answers)

12.2%

95% CI 5.7–24.2%

6 mentions · avg pos 6.6

first pick 0%

Best for: AI recommends Elastic Stack most when buyers ask “what open-source tool should I use to replace a costly hosted APM platform for a Kubernetes cluster” (44.4% of those answers)

12.2%

95% CI 5.7–24.2%

6 mentions · avg pos 7.3

first pick 0%

librenms.org

Best for: AI recommends LibreNMS most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source monitoring alternatives to large paid observability platforms” (66.7% of those answers)

12.2%

95% CI 5.7–24.2%

6 mentions · avg pos 11.2

first pick 0%

Best for: AI recommends ClickStack most when buyers ask “open-source observability alternatives to expensive cloud monitoring services” (33.3% of those answers)

10.2%

95% CI 4.4–21.8%

5 mentions · avg pos 4.5

first pick 0%

solarwinds.com

Best for: AI recommends SolarWinds Observability most when buyers ask “self-hosted observability platform for a fintech company with strict data residency requirements” (44.4% of those answers)

10.2%

95% CI 4.4–21.8%

5 mentions · avg pos 5.3

first pick 20%

Best for: AI recommends Grafana LGTM Stack most when buyers ask “best self-hosted observability stack for a DevOps team monitoring microservices” (33.3% of those answers)

10.2%

95% CI 4.4–21.8%

5 mentions · avg pos 5.5

first pick 0%

Best for: AI recommends Uptrace most when buyers ask “how do I set up a self-hosted monitoring system with metrics, logs, and traces in one place” (33.3% of those answers)

10.2%

95% CI 4.4–21.8%

5 mentions · avg pos 7.4

first pick 0%

fluentd.org

10.2%

95% CI 4.4–21.8%

5 mentions · avg pos 7.6

first pick 0%

fluentbit.io

10.2%

95% CI 4.4–21.8%

5 mentions · avg pos 10

first pick 0%

graylog.org

Best for: AI recommends Graylog most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source monitoring alternatives to large paid observability platforms” (33.3% of those answers)

10.2%

95% CI 4.4–21.8%

5 mentions · avg pos 10

first pick 0%

cubeapm.com

Best for: AI recommends CubeAPM most when buyers ask “self-hosted observability platform for a fintech company with strict data residency requirements” (44.4% of those answers)

10.2%

95% CI 4.4–21.8%

5 mentions · avg pos 13

first pick 0%

nagios.org

Best for: AI recommends Nagios most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source monitoring alternatives to large paid observability platforms” (44.4% of those answers)

10.2%

95% CI 4.4–21.8%

5 mentions · avg pos 13.3

first pick 0%

Best for: AI recommends Elastic APM most when buyers ask “best open-source monitoring platform for tracking application performance and infrastructure metrics” (44.4% of those answers)

10.2%

95% CI 4.4–21.8%

5 mentions · avg pos 15.8

first pick 0%

Best for: AI recommends HyperDX most when buyers ask “open-source observability alternatives to expensive cloud monitoring services” (33.3% of those answers)

8.2%

95% CI 3.2–19.2%

4 mentions · avg pos 5

first pick 0%

monitorix.org

Best for: AI recommends Monitorix most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source monitoring alternatives to large paid observability platforms” (44.4% of those answers)

8.2%

95% CI 3.2–19.2%

4 mentions · avg pos 5.8

first pick 25%

uptime.kuma.pet

Best for: AI recommends Uptime Kuma most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source monitoring alternatives to large paid observability platforms” (66.7% of those answers)

8.2%

95% CI 3.2–19.2%

4 mentions · avg pos 8.8

first pick 0%

8.2%

95% CI 3.2–19.2%

4 mentions · avg pos 14

first pick 0%

8.2%

95% CI 3.2–19.2%

4 mentions · avg pos 21.5

first pick 0%

metoro.io

Best for: AI recommends Metoro most when buyers ask “best self-hosted observability stack for a DevOps team monitoring microservices” (55.6% of those answers)

6.1%

95% CI 2.1–16.5%

3 mentions · avg pos 6

first pick 0%

cortex.io

Best for: AI recommends Cortex most when buyers ask “open-source observability alternatives to expensive cloud monitoring services” (33.3% of those answers)

6.1%

95% CI 2.1–16.5%

3 mentions · avg pos 6.3

first pick 33.3%

checkmk.com

Best for: AI recommends Checkmk most when buyers ask “lightweight open-source monitoring alternatives to large paid observability platforms” (44.4% of those answers)

6.1%

95% CI 2.1–16.5%

3 mentions · avg pos 12

first pick 0%

dev.to

6.1%

95% CI 2.1–16.5%

3 mentions

first pick 0%

middleware.io

4.1%

95% CI 1.1–13.7%

2 mentions · avg pos 3.5

first pick 0%

oneuptime.com

4.1%

95% CI 1.1–13.7%

2 mentions · avg pos 4.5

first pick 0%

coralogix.com

Best for: AI recommends Coralogix most when buyers ask “self-hosted observability platform for a fintech company with strict data residency requirements” (44.4% of those answers)

4.1%

95% CI 1.1–13.7%

2 mentions · avg pos 6

first pick 0%

splunk.com

4.1%

95% CI 1.1–13.7%

2 mentions · avg pos 7

first pick 0%

aws.amazon.com

4.1%

95% CI 1.1–13.7%

2 mentions · avg pos 7.5

first pick 0%

f6s.com

Best for: AI recommends F6S most when buyers ask “self-hosted observability platform for a fintech company with strict data residency requirements” (33.3% of those answers)

4.1%

95% CI 1.1–13.7%

2 mentions

first pick 0%

groundcover.com

Best for: AI recommends Groundcover most when buyers ask “open-source observability alternatives to expensive cloud monitoring services” (44.4% of those answers)

4.1%

95% CI 1.1–13.7%

2 mentions

first pick 0%

sourceforge.net

Best for: AI recommends SourceForge most when buyers ask “open-source observability alternatives to expensive cloud monitoring services” (33.3% of those answers)

4.1%

95% CI 1.1–13.7%

2 mentions

first pick 0%

cncf.io

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 1

first pick 100%

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 1

first pick 100%

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 3

first pick 0%

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 6

first pick 0%

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 7

first pick 0%

vector.co

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 22

first pick 0%

pagerduty.com

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions · avg pos 37

first pick 0%

braintrust.dev

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

countly.com

Best for: AI recommends Countly most when buyers ask “self-hosted observability platform for a fintech company with strict data residency requirements” (55.6% of those answers)

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

integrate.io

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

konghq.com

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

logicmonitor.com

Best for: AI recommends LogicMonitor most when buyers ask “what open-source tool should I use to replace a costly hosted APM platform for a Kubernetes cluster” (44.4% of those answers)

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

posthog.com

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

rollbar.com

Best for: AI recommends Rollbar most when buyers ask “what open-source tool should I use to replace a costly hosted APM platform for a Kubernetes cluster” (44.4% of those answers)

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

suse.com

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

sematext.com

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%

spacelift.io

2%

95% CI 0.4–10.7%

1 mentions

first pick 0%