What AI assistants actually recommend when buyers ask about incident management tools — measured weekly across 5 engines, published as open data.
Updated 2026-08-02 · 84 sampled answers · rolling 4-week window · methodology
Rankings are measured from sampled AI answers — never editorial, never paid. Orbator builds AI-visibility tooling; when Orbator itself appears in any category, it is measured by the same rules as everyone else.
Sample: 84 AI answers · Window: Jul 5, 2026 – Aug 2, 2026 (4-week rolling) · trend vs prior 4 weeks (46 answers)
Across 84 sampled AI answers from 5 engines, Slack is recommended most often — appearing in 84.5% of recommendations, followed by PagerDuty (71.4%) and incident.io (70.2%).
This is a measurement of share of voice across 5 AI engines — not an editorial pick. See the full ranking below.
| # | Product | Share | Trend | Engines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Slack slack.com Best for: AI recommends Slack most when buyers ask “best incident management tools for on-call engineering teams” (100% of those answers) | 84.5% 95% CI 75.3–90.7% 71 mentions · avg pos 4.5 first pick 23.9% | — | GROK 100%GEMINI 82.1%CHATGPT 100%CLAUDE 85.7%PERPLEXITY 78.6% | Claim |
| 2 | PagerDuty pagerduty.com Best for: AI recommends PagerDuty most when buyers ask “best incident management tools for on-call engineering teams” (100% of those answers) | 71.4% 95% CI 61–80% 60 mentions · avg pos 5.7 first pick 38.3% | — | GROK 100%GEMINI 64.3%CHATGPT 85.7%CLAUDE 85.7%PERPLEXITY 60.7% | Claim |
| 3 | incident.io incident.io Best for: AI recommends incident.io most when buyers ask “which incident management tool has the best postmortem and runbook features” (100% of those answers) | 70.2% 95% CI 59.8–79% 59 mentions · avg pos 5.9 first pick 22% | — | GROK 100%GEMINI 60.7%CHATGPT 71.4%CLAUDE 57.1%PERPLEXITY 78.6% | Claim |
| 4 | Rootly rootly.com Best for: AI recommends Rootly most when buyers ask “which incident management tool has the best postmortem and runbook features” (100% of those answers) | 61.9% 95% CI 51.2–71.6% 52 mentions · avg pos 7.6 first pick 5.8% | — | GROK 100%GEMINI 67.9%CHATGPT 71.4%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 60.7% | Claim |
| 5 | Opsgenie atlassian.com Best for: AI recommends Opsgenie most when buyers ask “what should I use to manage on-call schedules and route alerts to the right engineer” (100% of those answers) | 52.4% 95% CI 41.8–62.7% 44 mentions · avg pos 10.1 first pick 2.3% | — | GROK 85.7%GEMINI 53.6%CHATGPT 57.1%CLAUDE 35.7%PERPLEXITY 50% | Claim |
| 6 | Jira Best for: AI recommends Jira most when buyers ask “best platforms for managing on-call rotations and alerting” (64.3% of those answers) | 45.2% 95% CI 35–55.9% 38 mentions · avg pos 8.1 first pick 2.6% | — | GROK 57.1%GEMINI 42.9%CHATGPT 71.4%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 39.3% | Claim |
| 7 | Better Stack betterstack.com Best for: AI recommends Better Stack most when buyers ask “best incident management tools for on-call engineering teams” (64.3% of those answers) | 38.1% 95% CI 28.4–48.8% 32 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 9.4% | — | GROK 71.4%GEMINI 39.3%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 21.4%PERPLEXITY 35.7% | Claim |
| 8 | FireHydrant Best for: AI recommends FireHydrant most when buyers ask “which incident management tool has the best postmortem and runbook features” (100% of those answers) | 35.7% 95% CI 26.3–46.4% 30 mentions · avg pos 8.4 first pick 3.3% | — | GROK 71.4%GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 42.9% | Claim |
| 9 | Atlassian atlassystems.com Best for: AI recommends Atlassian most when buyers ask “best incident management tools for on-call engineering teams” (85.7% of those answers) | 34.5% 95% CI 25.2–45.2% 29 mentions · avg pos 8.4 first pick 3.4% | — | GROK 42.9%GEMINI 32.1%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 35.7% | Claim |
| 10 | Squadcast squadcast.com Best for: AI recommends Squadcast most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to expensive enterprise incident response platforms” (57.1% of those answers) | 33.3% 95% CI 24.2–43.9% 28 mentions · avg pos 8.3 first pick 7.1% | — | GROK 57.1%GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 50%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 11 | Splunk splunk.com Best for: AI recommends Splunk most when buyers ask “best platforms for managing on-call rotations and alerting” (85.7% of those answers) | 31% 95% CI 22.1–41.5% 26 mentions · avg pos 7.6 first pick 0% | — | GROK 57.1%GEMINI 39.3%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 7.1%PERPLEXITY 25% | Claim |
| 12 | OnPage onpage.com Best for: AI recommends OnPage most when buyers ask “best platforms for managing on-call rotations and alerting” (71.4% of those answers) | 27.4% 95% CI 19–37.7% 23 mentions · avg pos 6.6 first pick 0% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 35.7%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 32.1% | Claim |
| 13 | Prometheus prometheus.io Best for: AI recommends Prometheus most when buyers ask “best platforms for managing on-call rotations and alerting” (71.4% of those answers) | 26.2% 95% CI 18–36.5% 22 mentions · avg pos 6.5 first pick 4.5% | — | GROK 42.9%GEMINI 32.1%CHATGPT 57.1%PERPLEXITY 21.4% | Claim |
| 14 | Splunk On-Call Best for: AI recommends Splunk On-Call most when buyers ask “best platforms for managing on-call rotations and alerting” (64.3% of those answers) | 23.8% 95% CI 16–33.9% 20 mentions · avg pos 6.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 42.9%GEMINI 35.7%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 7.1%PERPLEXITY 17.9% | Claim |
| 15 | Zenduty zenduty.com Best for: AI recommends Zenduty most when buyers ask “what should I use to manage on-call schedules and route alerts to the right engineer” (57.1% of those answers) | 23.8% 95% CI 16–33.9% 20 mentions · avg pos 8.3 first pick 5% | — | GROK 57.1%GEMINI 28.6%CLAUDE 21.4%PERPLEXITY 17.9% | Claim |
| 16 | VictorOps Best for: AI recommends VictorOps most when buyers ask “best platforms for managing on-call rotations and alerting” (57.1% of those answers) | 20.2% 95% CI 13–30% 17 mentions · avg pos 6.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 35.7%CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 17 | Xurrent xurrent.com Best for: AI recommends Xurrent most when buyers ask “best platforms for managing on-call rotations and alerting” (57.1% of those answers) | 20.2% 95% CI 13–30% 17 mentions · avg pos 8.5 first pick 5.9% | — | GROK 57.1%GEMINI 10.7%PERPLEXITY 35.7% | Claim |
| 18 | Datadog datadoghq.com Best for: AI recommends Datadog most when buyers ask “best incident management tools for on-call engineering teams” (35.7% of those answers) | 20.2% 95% CI 13–30% 17 mentions · avg pos 9.1 first pick 5.9% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 25%CHATGPT 57.1%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 19 | Jira Service Management Best for: AI recommends Jira Service Management most when buyers ask “best incident management tools for on-call engineering teams” (42.9% of those answers) | 20.2% 95% CI 13–30% 17 mentions · avg pos 9.2 first pick 0% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 17.9%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 7.1%PERPLEXITY 25% | Claim |
| 20 | Hyperping hyperping.com Best for: AI recommends Hyperping most when buyers ask “what should I use to manage on-call schedules and route alerts to the right engineer” (57.1% of those answers) | 17.9% 95% CI 11.1–27.4% 15 mentions · avg pos 7.3 first pick 6.7% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 7.1%PERPLEXITY 39.3% | Claim |
| 21 | xMatters Best for: AI recommends xMatters most when buyers ask “best platforms for managing on-call rotations and alerting” (57.1% of those answers) | 16.7% 95% CI 10.2–26.1% 14 mentions · avg pos 7.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 7.1%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 22 | TheHive Best for: AI recommends TheHive most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to expensive enterprise incident response platforms” (92.9% of those answers) | 13.1% 95% CI 7.5–21.9% 11 mentions · avg pos 3.2 first pick 27.3% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 7.1%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 23 | Spike.sh spike.sh Best for: AI recommends Spike.sh most when buyers ask “on-call scheduling tools vs full incident management platforms for small DevOps teams” (42.9% of those answers) | 13.1% 95% CI 7.5–21.9% 11 mentions · avg pos 6.2 first pick 9.1% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 3.6%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 21.4% | Claim |
| 24 | ServiceNow servicenow.com Best for: AI recommends ServiceNow most when buyers ask “what should I use to manage on-call schedules and route alerts to the right engineer” (42.9% of those answers) | 13.1% 95% CI 7.5–21.9% 11 mentions · avg pos 21.5 first pick 9.1% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 21.4% | Claim |
| 25 | IRIS Best for: AI recommends IRIS most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to expensive enterprise incident response platforms” (71.4% of those answers) | 11.9% 95% CI 6.6–20.5% 10 mentions · avg pos 5.1 first pick 10% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 26 | Runframe runframe.io Best for: AI recommends Runframe most when buyers ask “best incident management tools for on-call engineering teams” (78.6% of those answers) | 9.5% 95% CI 4.9–17.7% 8 mentions · avg pos 7.4 first pick 12.5% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 14.3%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 27 | Autopsy Best for: AI recommends Autopsy most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to expensive enterprise incident response platforms” (57.1% of those answers) | 9.5% 95% CI 4.9–17.7% 8 mentions · avg pos 7.6 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 14.3%PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 28 | Velociraptor Best for: AI recommends Velociraptor most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to expensive enterprise incident response platforms” (50% of those answers) | 8.3% 95% CI 4.1–16.2% 7 mentions · avg pos 5.7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 29 | Wazuh wazuh.com Best for: AI recommends Wazuh most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to expensive enterprise incident response platforms” (50% of those answers) | 8.3% 95% CI 4.1–16.2% 7 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 14.3% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 7.1%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 7.1%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 30 | Connecteam connecteam.com Best for: AI recommends Connecteam most when buyers ask “best platforms for managing on-call rotations and alerting” (35.7% of those answers) | 8.3% 95% CI 4.1–16.2% 7 mentions · avg pos 9.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.1%PERPLEXITY 17.9% | Claim |
| 31 | Cynet cynet.com Best for: AI recommends Cynet most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to expensive enterprise incident response platforms” (50% of those answers) | 8.3% 95% CI 4.1–16.2% 7 mentions · avg pos 14 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 32 | GRR Rapid Response Best for: AI recommends GRR Rapid Response most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to expensive enterprise incident response platforms” (42.9% of those answers) | 7.1% 95% CI 3.3–14.7% 6 mentions · avg pos 5.2 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 10.7%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 33 | GoAlert goalert.me | 7.1% 95% CI 3.3–14.7% 6 mentions · avg pos 5.7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 3.6%CLAUDE 28.6% | Claim |
| 34 | AlertOps alertops.com | 7.1% 95% CI 3.3–14.7% 6 mentions · avg pos 8.3 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 10.7%CLAUDE 7.1%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 35 | SIGNL4 signl4.com Best for: AI recommends SIGNL4 most when buyers ask “on-call scheduling tools vs full incident management platforms for small DevOps teams” (35.7% of those answers) | 7.1% 95% CI 3.3–14.7% 6 mentions · avg pos 21 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 7.1%PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 36 | Spike | 6% 95% CI 2.6–13.2% 5 mentions · avg pos 7.4 first pick 0% | — | GROK 42.9%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 37 | Xurrent IMR | 6% 95% CI 2.6–13.2% 5 mentions · avg pos 11.4 first pick 20% | — | GROK 42.9%GEMINI 7.1% | Claim |
| 38 | SANS sans.org Best for: AI recommends SANS most when buyers ask “affordable alternatives to expensive enterprise incident response platforms” (35.7% of those answers) | 4.8% 95% CI 1.9–11.6% 4 mentions · avg pos 6.8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 10.7% | Claim |
| 39 | DFIR-IRIS | 4.8% 95% CI 1.9–11.6% 4 mentions · avg pos 7.8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 10.7%CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 40 | Hayabusa | 4.8% 95% CI 1.9–11.6% 4 mentions · avg pos 8.8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 10.7% | Claim |
| 41 | Blameless blameless.io | 4.8% 95% CI 1.9–11.6% 4 mentions · avg pos 11.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 42 | Rapid7 Insight rapid7.com | 4.8% 95% CI 1.9–11.6% 4 mentions · avg pos 15.3 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 43 | TaskCall taskcallapp.com | 4.8% 95% CI 1.9–11.6% 4 mentions first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 44 | Augment Code augmentcode.com Best for: AI recommends Augment Code most when buyers ask “best incident management tools for on-call engineering teams” (42.9% of those answers) | 3.6% 95% CI 1.2–10% 3 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 45 | ilert ilert.com | 3.6% 95% CI 1.2–10% 3 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 33.3% | — | GROK 28.6%CLAUDE 7.1% | Claim |
| 46 | Alertmanager | 3.6% 95% CI 1.2–10% 3 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 3.6%CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 47 | Graylog graylog.org | 3.6% 95% CI 1.2–10% 3 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.1%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 48 | OSSEC ossec.net | 3.6% 95% CI 1.2–10% 3 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 10.7% | Claim |
| 49 | KAPE | 3.6% 95% CI 1.2–10% 3 mentions · avg pos 9.7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 50 | OpenVAS openvas.org | 3.6% 95% CI 1.2–10% 3 mentions · avg pos 9.7 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 51 | Microsoft Lists | 3.6% 95% CI 1.2–10% 3 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 33.3% | — | PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 52 | Torq torq.io | 3.6% 95% CI 1.2–10% 3 mentions · avg pos 13 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 7.1% | Claim |
| 53 | Datadog Log Management datadog.com | 3.6% 95% CI 1.2–10% 3 mentions · avg pos 15.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 54 | Rapid7 Insight IDR | 3.6% 95% CI 1.2–10% 3 mentions · avg pos 15.5 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 10.7% | Claim |
| 55 | Cortex cortex.io | 3.6% 95% CI 1.2–10% 3 mentions · avg pos 28.7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 56 | Cortex XSOAR paloaltonetworks.com | 3.6% 95% CI 1.2–10% 3 mentions · avg pos 28.7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 57 | IRIS (DFIR-IRIS) dfir-iris.org | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.3% 2 mentions · avg pos 1 first pick 50% | — | GROK 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 58 | OneUptime oneuptime.com | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.3% 2 mentions · avg pos 5.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%CLAUDE 7.1% | Claim |
| 59 | Timesketch | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.3% 2 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 60 | SANS Investigative Forensics Toolkit (SIFT) Workstation | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.3% 2 mentions · avg pos 6.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.1% | Claim |
| 61 | PagerTree | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.3% 2 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 7.1%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 62 | Elasticsearch elastic.co | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.3% 2 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 63 | KnowBe4 PhishER knowbe4.com | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.3% 2 mentions · avg pos 10 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 64 | SigNoz signoz.io | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.3% 2 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3%PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 65 | Better Uptime betteruptime.com | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.3% 2 mentions · avg pos 13 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 7.1% | Claim |
| 66 | Microsoft Teams | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.3% 2 mentions · avg pos 14.5 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 7.1% | Claim |
| 67 | Security Onion securityonion.net | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.3% 2 mentions · avg pos 19.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 68 | Shuffle | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.3% 2 mentions · avg pos 19.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6%CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 69 | MISP misp-project.org | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.3% 2 mentions · avg pos 20 first pick 50% | — | GROK 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 70 | Tines | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.3% 2 mentions · avg pos 28.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 71 | CrowdStrike Falcon crowdstrike.com | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.3% 2 mentions · avg pos 47 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 72 | ITOC360 itoc360.com | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.3% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 73 | SolarWinds Observability solarwinds.com | 2.4% 95% CI 0.7–8.3% 2 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 7.1% | Claim |
| 74 | Cutover cutover.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 75 | Openduty | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 76 | Outlook outlook.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 77 | Microsoft microsoft.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 7.1% | Claim |
| 78 | Instatus instatus.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 79 | SIFT Workstation | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 80 | AlienVault OSSIM alienvault.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 81 | Kestra kestra.io | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 7.1% | Claim |
| 82 | Plaso | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 83 | SOAR | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 84 | Dispatch | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 85 | Elastic Stack | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 86 | Sherlocks.ai sherlocks.ai | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 9 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 87 | RTIR | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 10 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 88 | CATALYST omnipress.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 89 | Kaspersky Small Office Security | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 90 | Freshservice freshservice.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 12 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 91 | SIEM | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 16 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 92 | Sumo Logic sumologic.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 17 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 3.6% | Claim |
| 93 | CloudWatch | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 21 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 94 | Linear linear.app | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions · avg pos 52 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 95 | ASGARD Management Center | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 96 | Dev.to dev.to | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 97 | Freshsuccess freshworks.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 7.1% | Claim |
| 98 | GuideFlow guideflow.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 99 | IBM API Connect ibm.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
| 100 | LogicMonitor logicmonitor.com | 1.2% 95% CI 0.2–6.4% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 3.6% | Claim |
Reading the numbers: Share is a point estimate on 84 sampled answers, so each row also shows its 95% CI — the Wilson score interval around that share. When two products' intervals overlap, the gap between them isn't statistically meaningful at this sample size. First pick is the share of a product's recommending answers where it was named first, which separates “always mentioned” from “usually the top recommendation”. Full methodology.
Independence: Orbator customers are badged for disclosure. Customer status does not affect prompts, sampling, extraction, or ranking — see the methodology. Your product on this list? Claim it to see the prompts behind your rank and track it weekly.
What AI recommends in adjacent categories — same method, fresh weekly.
Not in the answer? That's fixable.
Check Your AI Visibility →© 2026 Orbator. All rights reserved.