What AI assistants actually recommend when buyers ask about self-hosted incident management tools — measured on a rolling 4-week window across 5 engines, published as open data.
Updated 2026-09-18 · 35 sampled answers · rolling 4-week window · methodology
Rankings are measured from sampled AI answers — never editorial, never paid. Orbator builds AI-visibility tooling; when Orbator itself appears in any category, it is measured by the same rules as everyone else.
Measured by Orbatormethodology owner Henrik Tellewindow ends Sep 18, 2026
Sample: 35 AI answers · Window: Aug 21, 2026 – Sep 18, 2026 (4-week rolling) · trend vs prior 4 weeks (54 answers)
Samples by engine: GROK 7 (last run Aug 25, 2026) · GEMINI 7 (last run Aug 25, 2026) · CHATGPT 7 (last run Aug 25, 2026) · CLAUDE 7 (last run Aug 26, 2026) · PERPLEXITY 7 (last run Aug 25, 2026 — stalest)
How these numbers are made: sampling design · prompt provenance · what counts as a mention · what we cannot see
On the record: This ranking is frozen as a dated snapshot every day. View this category's history to see what entered and left the ranking and when, or read what the engines actually said on a given day.
Across 35 sampled AI answers from 5 engines, OneUptime is recommended most often — appearing in 71.4% of recommendations, followed by Slack (51.4%) and Grafana (51.4%).
This is a measurement of share of voice across 5 AI engines — not an editorial pick. See the full ranking below.
Orbator asked Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity buyer questions about self-hosted incident management tools and sampled 35 answers between Aug 21, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026. Recommendation share counts the answers that recommended or listed a product, so a passing mention or a warning adds nothing to it. A category publishes once it holds at least 20 independently sampled answers in the window. Read the full methodology or download this ranking as CSV.
| # | Product | Share | Trend | Engines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | oneuptime.com | 71.4% 95% CI 54.9–83.7% 25 mentions · avg pos 3.2 first pick 40% | — | GROK 71.4%GEMINI 100%CHATGPT 85.7%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 57.1% | Claim |
| 2 | slack.com | 51.4% 95% CI 35.6–67% 18 mentions · avg pos 3.1 first pick 27.8% | — | GROK 100%GEMINI 71.4%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 3 | grafana.com | 51.4% 95% CI 35.6–67% 18 mentions · avg pos 3.8 first pick 27.8% | — | GROK 85.7%GEMINI 42.9%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 57.1% | Claim |
| 4 | goalert.me | 51.4% 95% CI 35.6–67% 18 mentions · avg pos 4.1 first pick 44.4% | — | GROK 71.4%GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 42.9%CLAUDE 57.1%PERPLEXITY 57.1% | Claim |
| 5 | pagerduty.com | 48.6% 95% CI 33–64.4% 17 mentions · avg pos 4.3 first pick 23.5% | — | GROK 85.7%GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 85.7%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 6 | OnCall | 48.6% 95% CI 33–64.4% 17 mentions · avg pos 5.3 first pick 17.6% | — | GROK 85.7%GEMINI 57.1%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 42.9%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 7 | Incidents | 48.6% 95% CI 33–64.4% 17 mentions · avg pos 5.6 first pick 17.6% | — | GROK 71.4%GEMINI 85.7%CHATGPT 57.1%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 8 | prometheus.io | 42.9% 95% CI 28–59.1% 15 mentions · avg pos 5.9 first pick 13.3% | — | GROK 100%GEMINI 42.9%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 9 | kubernetes.io | 40% 95% CI 25.6–56.4% 14 mentions · avg pos 3.9 first pick 21.4% | — | GROK 85.7%GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 57.1% | Claim |
| 10 | Alertmanager | 37.1% 95% CI 23.2–53.7% 13 mentions · avg pos 4.2 first pick 7.7% | — | GROK 71.4%GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 57.1%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 11 | docker.com | 31.4% 95% CI 18.6–48% 11 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 18.2% | — | GROK 57.1%GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 12 | incidentrelay.io | 31.4% 95% CI 18.6–48% 11 mentions · avg pos 5.3 first pick 36.4% | — | GROK 71.4%GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 28.6%PERPLEXITY 42.9% | Claim |
| 13 | dfir-iris.org | 31.4% 95% CI 18.6–48% 11 mentions · avg pos 6.2 first pick 9.1% | — | GROK 42.9%GEMINI 57.1%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 42.9% | Claim |
| 14 | incident.io | 25.7% 95% CI 14.2–42.1% 9 mentions · avg pos 2.6 first pick 22.2% | — | GROK 57.1%CHATGPT 57.1%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 15 | helm.sh | 25.7% 95% CI 14.2–42.1% 9 mentions · avg pos 3.9 first pick 0% | — | GROK 57.1%GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 16 | twilio.com | 25.7% 95% CI 14.2–42.1% 9 mentions · avg pos 6.1 first pick 22.2% | — | GROK 71.4%GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 28.6% | Claim |
| 17 | keephq.dev | 25.7% 95% CI 14.2–42.1% 9 mentions · avg pos 6.2 first pick 0% | — | GROK 57.1%GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 18 | opsknight.com | 22.9% 95% CI 12.1–39% 8 mentions · avg pos 4.4 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 42.9%CHATGPT 57.1% | Claim |
| 19 | thehive-project.org | 20% 95% CI 10–35.9% 7 mentions · avg pos 3.7 first pick 14.3% | — | GEMINI 42.9%PERPLEXITY 57.1% | Claim |
| 20 | atlassian.com | 17.1% 95% CI 8.1–32.7% 6 mentions · avg pos 2.5 first pick 16.7% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 42.9% | Claim |
| 21 | zabbix.com | 17.1% 95% CI 8.1–32.7% 6 mentions · avg pos 6.3 first pick 16.7% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 22 | Grafana Loki | 17.1% 95% CI 8.1–32.7% 6 mentions first pick 0% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 23 | datadoghq.com | 14.3% 95% CI 6.3–29.4% 5 mentions · avg pos 7.2 first pick 20% | — | GROK 28.6%GEMINI 28.6%CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 24 | postgresql.org | 14.3% 95% CI 6.3–29.4% 5 mentions · avg pos 9.2 first pick 0% | — | GROK 57.1%GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 25 | Grafana OnCall OSS | 11.4% 95% CI 4.5–26% 4 mentions · avg pos 3.3 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%CHATGPT 28.6%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 26 | omnipress.com | 11.4% 95% CI 4.5–26% 4 mentions · avg pos 4.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 14.3%PERPLEXITY 28.6% | Claim |
| 27 | Cabot | 11.4% 95% CI 4.5–26% 4 mentions · avg pos 4.8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 28 | aws.amazon.com | 11.4% 95% CI 4.5–26% 4 mentions · avg pos 14.8 first pick 0% | — | GROK 42.9%GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 29 | microsoft.com | 8.6% 95% CI 3–22.4% 3 mentions · avg pos 2.7 first pick 33.3% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 28.6% | Claim |
| 30 | Dispatch | 8.6% 95% CI 3–22.4% 3 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 28.6%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 31 | Openduty | 8.6% 95% CI 3–22.4% 3 mentions · avg pos 5.3 first pick 33.3% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 32 | sentry.io | 8.6% 95% CI 3–22.4% 3 mentions · avg pos 7 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 14.3%PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 33 | openalternative.co | 8.6% 95% CI 3–22.4% 3 mentions · avg pos 10 first pick 33.3% | — | GROK 42.9% | Claim |
| 34 | redis.io | 8.6% 95% CI 3–22.4% 3 mentions · avg pos 20 first pick 0% | — | GROK 42.9% | Claim |
| 35 | LinkedIn OnCall | 5.7% 95% CI 1.6–18.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 36 | openstatus.dev | 5.7% 95% CI 1.6–18.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 3.5 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 28.6% | Claim |
| 37 | nginx.org | 5.7% 95% CI 1.6–18.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 7.5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3%CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 38 | telegram.org | 5.7% 95% CI 1.6–18.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 8.5 first pick 50% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 39 | mattermost.com | 5.7% 95% CI 1.6–18.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 11 first pick 0% | — | GROK 28.6% | Claim |
| 40 | pagefire.dev | 5.7% 95% CI 1.6–18.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 14.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 41 | sqlite.org | 5.7% 95% CI 1.6–18.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 16 first pick 0% | — | GROK 28.6% | Claim |
| 42 | mysql.com | 5.7% 95% CI 1.6–18.6% 2 mentions · avg pos 17.5 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3%GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 43 | cortex.io | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 1 first pick 100% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 44 | fluidify.ai | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 2 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 45 | DFIR-IRIS | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 46 | nagios.org | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 47 | pingdom.com | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 48 | Server Density | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 49 | Velociraptor | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 3 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 50 | misp-project.org | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 51 | rocket.chat | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 52 | uptime.kuma.pet | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 53 | Versus | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 4 first pick 0% | — | PERPLEXITY 14.3% | Claim |
| 54 | cachethq.io | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 55 | RTIR | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 56 | Request Tracker for Incident Response | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 5 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 57 | ntfy.sh | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 58 | rabbitmq.com | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 59 | servicenow.com | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | CHATGPT 14.3% | Claim |
| 60 | TheHive Project | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 6 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 61 | centos.org | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 62 | ubuntu.com | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 8 first pick 0% | — | GEMINI 14.3% | Claim |
| 63 | glpi-project.org | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 26 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 64 | iTop | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions · avg pos 26 first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 65 | betterstack.com | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
| 66 | rootly.com | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | CLAUDE 14.3% | Claim |
| 67 | wiz.io | 2.9% 95% CI 0.5–14.5% 1 mentions first pick 0% | — | GROK 14.3% | Claim |
Reading the numbers: Share is a point estimate on 35 sampled answers, so each row also shows its 95% CI — the Wilson score interval around that share. When two products' intervals overlap, the gap between them isn't statistically meaningful at this sample size. First pick is the share of a product's recommending answers where it was named first, which separates “always mentioned” from “usually the top recommendation”. Full methodology.
Independence: Orbator customers are badged for disclosure. Customer status does not affect prompts, sampling, extraction, or ranking — see the methodology. Your product on this list? Claim it to see the prompts behind your rank and track it weekly.
Watch this category
These rankings move. Get one email a week on who AI recommends in Self-hosted incident management tools. No account needed.
Head-to-head pages for products ranked in Self-hosted incident management tools. Each one sets out sourced facts side by side, plus which product AI assistants recommend more, engine by engine.
Every number on this page is measured from sampled answers, and those answers are kept. The archive holds dated excerpts of what each engine answered, never full answers. Read the answer archive for self-hosted incident management tools to see the excerpts by date and engine, or view the ranking history to see what entered and left this ranking and when.
Across 35 sampled AI answers from 5 engines (Aug 21, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026), OneUptime is recommended most often for self-hosted incident management tools, appearing in 71.4% of recommendations, followed by Slack (51.4%). This is a measurement of what AI assistants recommend, not an editorial verdict.
ChatGPT recommends OneUptime most often for self-hosted incident management tools. It appears as a recommendation in 85.7% of ChatGPT's sampled answers in this window (Aug 21, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026). Other engines answer differently. The per-engine breakdown in the ranking shows each one.
Orbator samples AI answers to buyer questions across 5 engines and counts how often each product is recommended. No product pays for placement. The self-hosted incident management tools ranking is based on 35 answers in the current 4-week window (Aug 21, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026). Full methodology is published at https://www.orbator.io/ai-index/methodology.
Verified facts for the most-recommended products — each sourced and dated. No editorial scoring, just the data side by side.
| Kuberneteskubernetes.io | Dockerdocker.com | PostgreSQLpostgresql.org | AWSaws.amazon.com | Microsoftmicrosoft.com | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | — | Pro: $11 a month, $9 a year (free tier available) ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | — | — | — |
| Features | Automated rollouts and rollbacks ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | Docker AI Governance ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | reliability ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | over 240 comprehensive services ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | cloud storage ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 |
| Platforms | — | Linux ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 | — | — | XBOX console ↗ sourceverified Sep 5, 2026 |
What AI recommends in adjacent categories — same method, fresh weekly.
Not in the answer? That's fixable.
Check Your AI Visibility →© 2026 Orbator. All rights reserved.